XP SP3 makes Vista SP1 a laughing stock

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet Australia
27 November 2007 05:57 PM
Tags: vista, xp, service pack, sp1, sp3, microsoft

New tests have revealed that XP with the beta SP3 has twice the performance of Vista, even with the long awaited SP1.

Vista's first service pack, to be released early next year, is intended to boost the operating system's performance. However, when Vista with the SP1 beta was put through benchmark testing by researchers at Devil Mountain Software the improvement was not overwhelming -- leaving the latest Windows iteration outshined by its predecessor.

Vista, both with and without SP1, performed over two times slower than XP with SP3 in the test, taking over 80 seconds to complete the test, compared to the beta SP3 enhanced XP's 35 seconds.

Vista's performance with the service pack increased less than two percent compared to performance without SP1 -- much lower than XP's SP3 improvement of 10 percent.

The tests, run on a Dell XPS M1710 test bed with 2GHz Core 2 Duo CPU and 1GB of RAM, put Microsoft Office 2007 through a set of productivity tasks, including creating a compound document and supporting workbooks and presentations materials.

Want to know more?

    For all the latest news, analysis and opinion on Windows, click here

In response to the test, a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement that although the company understood the interest in the service packs, they are "still in development" and will continue to evolve before their release. "It has always been our goal to deliver service packs that meet the full spectrum of customer needs," they said.

If SP1 does not evolve sufficiently, it could be another setback for Vista, with many businesses waiting to adopt the operating system until the service pack is released.

A year after its launch, only 13 percent of businesses have adopted Vista, according to a survey of IT professionals.

Microsoft admits that the launch has not run as well as it would have liked. "Frankly, the world wasn't 100 percent ready for Windows Vista," corporate vice president Mike Sievert said in a recent interview at Microsoft's partner conference in Denver.

Microsoft has not done enough to make users aware of the benefits of Vista, NPD analyst Chris Swenson said at the conference. "The problem is that there are a lot of complex new features in Vista, and you need to educate consumers about them ... Much like Apple educating the masses about the possibilities of the iPhone, or focusing on a single feature or benefit of the Mac OS in the Mac versus PC commercials, Microsoft should be educating the masses about the various new features in a heavy rotation of Vista in TV, radio and print ads. But the volume of ads has paled in comparison to the ads run for XP."

XP has proved to be more popular than its younger sibling, with the first six months of US retail sales of box copies of Vista 59.7 percent below those of XP's in the equivalent period after its release.

Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP on new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at 31 January next year. However, the pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that Microsoft has been forced to increase the deadline for another five months until June.

According to Microsoft, sales of Vista have been picking up, with the software giant reporting 88 million units sold.

Ina Fried of CNET News contributed to this article.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    World not ready for Vista? What total BS Anonymous -- 28/11/07

    Users are more than willing to upgrade to something safer and faster, given all the dangers in the online world.

    The fact is that MS has forgotten what made XP popular in the first place, and pushed for a launch when Vista's not ready. Or they thought the new hardware and software upgrades would negate the lack of working drivers and speed.

    "The world wasn't 100 percent ready for Windows Vista" says the pointy-haired MS corporate vice president - Testimony to their lack of perspective.

    XP SP3 makes Vista SP1 a laughing stock Anonymous -- 28/11/07

    my organisation (and i suspect a lot of others) would have to upgrade at least 70% of our PC fleet in order to run vista efficiently.. either RAM upgrades or completely new PC's.
    perhaps if Microsoft didnt continue to develop such "bloatware" there would be more excitement about upgrading to the new technology...

    What else is new? Ian Bennett -- 29/11/07

    Isnt every major release of Windows slower than its predecessor?

    Try running XP on the Pentium 2 that Windows 95 happily ran on. Try running 95 on the 386 that 3.1 ran on.

    It's what you get for all the new bells and whistles but the hardware capacity increases along with it.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured