Microsoft suspends XP's death sentence

Bowing to pressure from customers and computer makers, Microsoft plans to keep Windows XP around a little longer.

Large PC manufacturers were slated to have to stop selling XP after 31 January. However, they have successfully lobbied Microsoft to allow them to continue selling PCs with all flavours of Windows XP preloaded until 30 June, a further five months.

Microsoft also plans to keep XP on retail shelves longer and will allow computer makers in emerging markets to build machines with Windows XP Starter Edition until June 2010.

The move indicates the continued demand for the older operating system, some nine months after Windows Vista hit store shelves.

In recent weeks, several PC makers launched programs that allow new PC buyers to more easily "downgrade" their Vista Business and Vista Ultimate machines to Windows XP. Fujitsu, which was among those lobbying for the change, has started including an XP restore disc in the box with all of its laptops running Vista Business.

"This allows the installed base of Windows XP users more time to manage the transition to Vista, which is important for some smaller companies with limited resources," Paul Moore, senior director of mobile product marketing for Fujitsu, said in a statement.

Dell also said it support's Microsoft's decision.

"We believe the additional time will help some customers to prepare for the transition from XP to Vista," the company said in a statement.

Microsoft, for its part, sought to downplay the impact of the move, disagreeing with the notion that there is still strong demand for XP.

"We wouldn't term it strong," said Kevin Kutz, a director in Microsoft's Windows Client unit. "We would describe this as accommodating a certain element who needs more time."

Kutz said Microsoft had seen similar demand patterns with past releases and noted that in the past, old operating systems remained available for around 18 months after the release of a new operating system.

"While Windows Vista sales are still going strong ... we recognize there are some customers that need more time," Kutz said.

Ina Fried reported from San Francisco for CNET News.com.

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    More Time?Ian Bond -- 01/10/07

    Who needs more time to adjust to using Vista? I DON'T WANT Vista and it's reportedly memory hungry software.

    Is this a negative campaign by Micro$oft to make XP users appear to be dim-wits? I could argue it's the SMART ones who dont want to change. To me Vista is a little bit like ME or Win 2000 - a mere stopgap in the development of the next OS, and a way for M$ to milk some more money out of suckers.

    OK - M$ fanboys, dispute all I've said ... but I ain't changing to Vista!

    Interesting pointSean -- 02/10/07 (in reply to #320087036)

    It's interesting that you make reference to "reportedly memory hungry software"... Does this mean that you've never actually USED the operating system?? I too loved to hate vista because it seemed like the thing to do with all the negative press around, after actually USING it I was able to make an INFORMED decision that what most people had been complaining about didn't apply to my situation and for me vista has been far superior to XP. It really isn't anywhere as bad as what everyone makes it out to be. I've never once had any resource problems with vista, whereas that was a daily occurrence with my former XP machine - it got worse the longer I kept it too..

    Vista SchmistaAnonymous -- 01/10/07

    I bought a new laptop a few months ago, just after Vista came out, specifically because it had XP on it.

    Too many stories at the time in the PC press about how many things didn't work (software and hardware).

    When all you want to do is work with programs you know work on XP, why try them on an unknown platform that basically the experts says looks pretty (and consumes lots of resources).

    Sorry but 5 years (do the MS guys use the same project management software they sell?) and there really is so little to be excited over. A pretty theme does not a pleasant operating environment make.

    The whole thing has made me finally jump ship. I'm now looking at buying into an Apple setup so I can run my old XP stuff until I get used to their ways. When I walked into the store and said what I was planning the salesman just smiled and said "we get a lot of you guys coming in".

    No wonder Bill wants to retire :)

    Ascentive ActiveSpeedFred Daddio -- 02/10/07

    THIS IS A DISHONEST RIP-OFF!

    Shame on ZDNet for advertising this cheat!

    They reported only about 1000 kbps when I am really running from 3800 to over 6000 kbps! They did this repeatedly. They said I should use their product to speed up my connection. For details, read on.

    I just clicked on their add on at ZDNet's Australian page about speedtests. [www.zdnet.com.au/broadband/speedtest.htm] I ran the Ascentive speed test out of curiousity. It reports a slow speed no matter what the actual speed really is.

    I have a cable connection from Time Warner/RoadRunner. The installer used Speakeasy.net to test the speed. I check it now and then so I know it generally runs between 4500 and 5000 unless the net is congested. Today it actually ran a 6164 kbps at Speakeasy. On the ZDNet speed test it ran various speeds from 3800 to over 6000 kbps - with an Australian website. I am located in the USA. I tested my speeds before and after trying the so-called "speed test" at Ascentive.

    As a further check I used my Netgear software to monitor actual data traffic between my computer and the internet as it passed through my Netgear WG111T wireless router. During the Ascentive "speedtests" the actual number of received packets per second varied, never exceeding 45, mostly running in the 20's, sometimes in the teens. In comparison, during the other two real speedtests the number of received packets per second ranged between 380 and 550, mostly in the high 400's to low 500's.

    So, the network was delivering data fast enough, my browser was receiving data fast enough, but during Ascentive's phony "speedtest" they just were not sending data fast enough.

    They are cheating! Stay away from Ascentive and ActiveSpeed!

    What has this got to do with Vista?Anonymous -- 02/10/07 (in reply to #320087056)

    Perhaps you should read about the above article and comment on that eh? Pay attention Fred!

    Anyhow, as Vista starts to mature and as you start to get used to it, it does have more appeal than XP and it does try hard to keep your system up to date but it still seems to lack a certain something for the years of development.
    One is certainly tempted to dabble with Linux, just to see what is missing or great in one camp or another.

    yeahAnonymous -- 05/10/07

    I don't care 'case I dont and have no plans to use fista or any microshaft software.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • David Braue Will Rudd's bush backhaul bonanza deliver?
    Rural areas will be welcoming the government's decision to put its money where its politicising is, funnelling $250m into a regional fibre upgrade to six rural centres. Remedying over a decade of near-neglect at the hands of telecoms privatisation, the investment could be the firmest step yet for Labor's NBN dream — but with inevitable political questions and a looming election, Rudd and Conroy need to deliver, and quickly, to preserve the NBN's credibility.
  • Array Doing for AV what VoIP did for telephony
    Sydney-based start-up Audinate is making traditional analog cabling obsolete in favour of TCP/IP-based networking technology. And it's doing a pretty good job so far, with its technology used by World Youth Day and the Sydney Opera House.
  • Array WiMax in Australia: Part two
    WiMax could be the standard that drives the next phase of mobile broadband, it provides an opportunity for players wanting to establish a pure IP network to carry voice and data effectively — but is this what operators want?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured