Can #HP bounce back?: HP's move to cut 27,000 jobs, reinvest in research and development (R&D) and generally get... http://t.co/dlgAhwxb
Can HP bounce back? http://t.co/qLlHB5FV
It's nice to see Tas finally get some decent internet connectivity, for too long Tas has been stooged on decent internet connectivity but...
Cloud inefficiency - Bad habits are hard to break: Cloud can save you a lot of money - if you use it effectively... http://t.co/oVoNx2na
by http://t.co/vmlLt4bh: Can HP bounce back?: HP's move to cut 27,000 jobs, reinvest in research and development ... http://t.co/EjWWU9O1
Can HP bounce back?: HP's move to cut 27,000 jobs, reinvest in research and development (R&D) and generally get ... http://t.co/KDGewBVH
Can HP bounce back?: HP's move to cut 27,000 jobs, reinvest in research and development (R&D) and generally get ... http://t.co/y2ajlh9V
Three tips for businesses to support connected customers: While the connected home offers benefits to the consum... http://t.co/psgHJelD
#Agedcare 30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation: Most IT teams spend 90 per cent of today making sure that... http://t.co/HmVXHRQ7
[plug] #NBN cost-benefit analyses are so 2011 http://t.co/2mRUKI8G @TurnbullMalcolm has forgotten his CBA; sh/would he still do one? #zdnet
Can HP bounce back? http://t.co/LlAUcyYP
Who is Luke Hartsuyker? He must be the Apprentice FUDster.
As PaulPC has already said regional consumers want, deserve and are entitled...
Three tips for businesses to support connected customers http://t.co/W7Sr3RpD
by http://t.co/vmlLt4bh: Did RIM shelve plans to license BBM?: Research In Motion (RIM) had considered licensing ... http://t.co/z6VlO472
Did RIM shelve plans to license BBM? - ZDNet Australia http://t.co/j042NNOM
Did RIM shelve plans to license BBM? - ZDNet Australia http://t.co/qMNEifi1
Its good to see the NBN keeping up with the latest equipement & letting the people benefit from it.
After all thats why it was a trial, ...
#Google TV will revolutionize television once viewers understand it http://t.co/Pmie5zEC http://t.co/2GN4qz9j http://t.co/j3wf6jEF
RT @zdnetaustralia: NBN Co will spend $1.3 million upgrading some 700 network terminating units in Tasmania. http://t.co/6GWYMcZQ
Did RIM shelve plans to license BBM?: Research In Motion (RIM) had considered licensing BlackBerry Messenger (BB... http://t.co/G13GBXl4
Did RIM shelve plans to license BBM? http://t.co/KKPZVPOr
Did RIM shelve plans to license BBM? http://t.co/1AutUH8l
Are college students dependent on technology? http://t.co/4p3v9PZ9 via @ZDNet
30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation http://t.co/dOR009Te
Govt urges telcos to team up against NBN Co http://t.co/Sn7pMhew
NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million http://t.co/iDlBr20I
Govt urges telcos to team up against NBN Co: The Department of Broadband, Communications and the Di... http://t.co/YVVOyRWA #suretelecom
by http://t.co/vmlLt4bh: NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million: NBN Co will spend $1.3 million on replacing o... http://t.co/FwL9gNKF
NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million: NBN Co will spend $1.3 million on replacing outdated network technolo... http://t.co/sIP3aI5l
RT @zdnetaustralia: Google found itself embroiled in a vicious tax debate this week. Serves it right? http://t.co/Ga14Yg6x ^ST
NBN's Tassie upgrade to cost $1.3 million: NBN Co will spend $1.3 million on replacing outdated network technolo... http://t.co/JYdFJbxj
NBN Co will spend $1.3 million upgrading some 700 network terminating units in Tasmania. http://t.co/6GWYMcZQ
30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation: Most IT teams spend 90 per cent of today making sure that tomorrow ... http://t.co/XUeMXUbH
30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation - ZDNet Australia http://t.co/PH4wzSvv
BUPA Aged Care CIO redoes virtualisation, achieves 30 servers to 7 http://t.co/apg5lb81 ^ST
30 servers to 7: BUPA redoes virtualisation: Most IT teams spend 90 per cent of today making sure that tomorrow ... http://t.co/a8M45uUs
Government urges telcos to team up with Telstra in negotiations with NBN Co http://t.co/TRCxJBxq ^jt
RT @zdnetaustralia: Government urges telcos to team up with Telstra in negotiations with NBN Co http://t.co/TRCxJBxq ^jt
Shadow Minister for Regional Communications Luke Hartsuyker has got it wrong. Regional consumers want improved mobile services AND the NB...
Just remember that Google haven't broken any laws here, they're just doing what all their other multinational competitiors do; minimise t...
ルイヴィトン バッグ : http://www.lovebagjp.com/
Louis Vuitton bags, Louis Vuitton pretension nose about,Louis Vuitton daydre...
シャネル バッグ : http://www.bagssalejp.org/
Chanel trap,chanel shekels,gucci bags,direct purse,poor recent Louis Vuitton keep...
I guess but in both cases, dead body!
I think it's for the very reasons you mention in your first paragraph that there is no CBA. With the ideological differences and vested ...
Good points; but how do you establish consensus about the terms of reference of a cost-benefit analysis? What is to be included? How far ...
I live in a small country town & have done since 2002. When I got to this town it had no mobile phone & no broadband.
The only reason w...
Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I...
Like most things in life, the devil is in the details. If a cost benefit analysis included a societal element, I'm certain nobody on eit...
The coalition has done nothing else but keep changing their view over the last 2 years.
-first it was "there is nothing wrong with the ...
Use the force Luke... FFS
Hey butterflyeffecs and lex,
Sorry you're not fans of this piece. But you're dead right in that it is the thoughts and experience of a se...
We have fashional replica bags designer .Replica luxury bags sale here are perfect compromise of quality and price. The replica handbags ...
It's not a question of whether anyone at HSU would know how to do this, but whether they would have connections with people who could. T...
This story has been voted 12000 times in the last 24 hours!
20 hours ago, Is Bill Gates a great leader?
This story has been voted 10 times in the last 24 hours!
2 days ago, CeBIT 2012 opens: photos
This story has been voted 15 times in the last 24 hours!
2 days ago, Lenovo ThinkPad 3G tablet (32GB)
Outlook
Given the breadth of products you studied, it's a pity you didn't include Microsoft Outlook itself as a reference point. That would help people answer the most interesting question of all - are the alternatives better?
Outlook/Exchange
Agreed. Outlook and Exchange are still number 1 here, and it's because (despite their problems), they're still the best.
I think the Notes client is worse than the GroupWise client (although GroupWise has had problems on the server end).
As has been mentioned earlier, Lotus Notes sucks big time (big usuability problems, the single-threaded UI of the Notes client, the larger number of help desk calls, higher staff requirements, maintenance issues, etc.), and saying it's good enough for IBM is just pathetic - it's their product! (I'd like to see the numbers when you remove sites where IBM is the outsourcer. I wouldn't use Microsoft as a reason to recommend Exchange/Outlook, nor Novell with GroupWise).
Groupwise server problems
What server problems are you talking about I have been in groupwise shops with 20,000 users and they only had two administrators for the whole system- Groupwise and Novell. When you talk about server problems what about the fact that you have to take the whole information store down to to any king of maintance on the server. Not with Groupwise you and check individual or entire postoffice without taking anyone off of the system. What about microsoft offline defrag which requires you to have 150% free storage space to run. That is very expensive for storage cost. There is no such requirment for groupwise. You and also run groupwise servers on linux, netware, and windows. What about the high number of viruses that attack outlook. Do some checking and compare the number to exchange/outlook.
Groupwise Server Probelms??
I would have to agree with Doug on this one, we just recently made the decision to explore Exchange but more and more you find Total cost of ownership are so much higher than Groupwise over all. We have about 500 users and run great some mailboxes we have are 25gb and run, how many exchange admins have a client like that in their active mailbox. I just dont get it. They are #1 because of marketing and advertising, its simple advertise enough of something people will think its standard because that is all you hear. Just google how many companies are available to maintain and patch your exchange server, that's a sign people, do the same search for groupwise and see what difference, ITs becasue it just works. On a typical year I might experience 4-6 hours of down time and that is to apply the 3-5 new patches a year that is released, and reboot. with exchange, new patches every week to apply, security vulnerabilities, A big bulls eye for the hacker community, so even if it was running perfectly all year and you only spent a half hour applying patches that is still 26 hours of down time. What am I missing here. Now I understand that everyone coming out of school knows microsoft, thats why a student can buy office for $30 and then a business has to pay $400 for that person to continue using it. Thats why microsof is #1 they are the best marketing company that is and will ever exist. My findings overall Micro$oft is about 60% higher than comparable solutions in Novell is this worth the additional pain, I dont know.
"its simple advertise enough of something people will think its standard because that is all you hear. Just google..."
Ahh, the irony...
Groupwise Server Probelms??
I would have to agree with Doug on this one, we just recently made the decision to explore Exchange but more and more you find Total cost of ownership are so much higher than Groupwise over all. We have about 500 users and run great some mailboxes we have are 25gb and run, how many exchange admins have a client like that in their active mailbox. I just dont get it. They are #1 because of marketing and advertising, its simple advertise enough of something people will think its standard because that is all you hear. Just google how many companies are available to maintain and patch your exchange server, that's a sign people, do the same search for groupwise and see what difference, ITs becasue it just works. On a typical year I might experience 4-6 hours of down time and that is to apply the 3-5 new patches a year that is released, and reboot. with exchange, new patches every week to apply, security vulnerabilities, A big bulls eye for the hacker community, so even if it was running perfectly all year and you only spent a half hour applying patches that is still 26 hours of down time. What am I missing here. Now I understand that everyone coming out of school knows microsoft, thats why a student can buy office for $30 and then a business has to pay $400 for that person to continue using it. Thats why microsof is #1 they are the best marketing company that is and will ever exist. My findings overall Micro$oft is about 60% higher than comparable solutions in Novell is this worth the additional pain, I dont know.
Groupwise server problems
What server problems are you talking about I have been in groupwise shops with 20,000 users and they only had two administrators for the whole system- Groupwise and Novell. When you talk about server problems what about the fact that you have to take the whole information store down to to any king of maintance on the server. Not with Groupwise you and check individual or entire postoffice without taking anyone off of the system. What about microsoft offline defrag which requires you to have 150% free storage space to run. That is very expensive for storage cost. There is no such requirment for groupwise. You and also run groupwise servers on linux, netware, and windows. What about the high number of viruses that attack outlook. Do some checking and compare the number to exchange/outlook.
Groupwise Server Probelms??
I would have to agree with Doug on this one, we just recently made the decision to explore Exchange but more and more you find Total cost of ownership are so much higher than Groupwise over all. We have about 500 users and run great some mailboxes we have are 25gb and run, how many exchange admins have a client like that in their active mailbox. I just dont get it. They are #1 because of marketing and advertising, its simple advertise enough of something people will think its standard because that is all you hear. Just google how many companies are available to maintain and patch your exchange server, that's a sign people, do the same search for groupwise and see what difference, ITs becasue it just works. On a typical year I might experience 4-6 hours of down time and that is to apply the 3-5 new patches a year that is released, and reboot. with exchange, new patches every week to apply, security vulnerabilities, A big bulls eye for the hacker community, so even if it was running perfectly all year and you only spent a half hour applying patches that is still 26 hours of down time. What am I missing here. Now I understand that everyone coming out of school knows microsoft, thats why a student can buy office for $30 and then a business has to pay $400 for that person to continue using it. Thats why microsof is #1 they are the best marketing company that is and will ever exist. My findings overall Micro$oft is about 60% higher than comparable solutions in Novell is this worth the additional pain, I dont know.