Titstorm 'irresponsible', says Conroy

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has called attacks on government websites meant as a protest against his planned filtering scheme "totally irresponsible".

Conroy at AusCERT

Stephen Conroy at AusCERT
(Credit: Liam Tung & Ed Tran/ZDNet.com.au)

"Denial-of-service [DOS] attacks on government websites are totally irresponsible and potentially deny services to the Australian public," a spokesperson for Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said in a statement to ZDNet.com.au.

"The government welcomes public debate on the merits of ISP [internet service provider] filtering, but denial-of-service attacks are not a legitimate form of political statement."

The attacks, claimed to have been led by a group called Anonymous and dubbed "Operation Titstorm", hit the Australian Parliament House and Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy websites this morning.

At 2:00pm the Department of Broadband's website was live again while parliament's remained down. At 2:20pm the Department of Immigration's website was not responsive. Despite this, the Department of Immigration responded to queries by stating that it was functioning "without issue".

Anonymous appeared to be using Internet Relay Chat (IRC) to coordinate the attack, with chat members saying they planned to further the attacks to other government websites, including the Department of Immigration's and the National Security website.

"KEEP HITTING APH [Australian Parliament House] AND IMMI [Immigration], hit nationalsecurity.gov.au if you have resources," said IRC user Snafu.

"[These] servers are held up by a piece of string and a slab of scotch tape," said a chat user with the handle Lolollol.

Technology experts group SAGE-AU also condemned the attacks.

"While SAGE-AU believes that imminent internet filtering legislation will fail to work, it has condemned DOS attacks as the wrong way to express disagreement with the proposed law."

Talkback

DOS and the Feds

Bit of a worry that this could be achieved at Fed level. Doesn't inspire confidence. And these are the 'informed' people who want us to give us an internet filter?

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

These aren't mission-critical systems

These attacks have been on public websites, which are resourced with only a moderate amount of server capacity and bandwidth. It seems to be standard operating procedure to not provide additional resources when the load goes up during a DDoS attack but simply let them be taken offline, or take them offline.

Parliament House website, for example, merely provides parliamentary schedules and Hansard and other non-critical data to the public. It's not that big a deal if it's not available for an hour or three.

Any systems which are actually used to run the country are handled very differently.

StilgherrianStilgherrian February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

APH

APH is pretty mission critical for me as a reporter.

I had to email APH for senate estimate transcripts :(. So old school

Ben GrubbBen Grubb February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Online petition againt Internet censorship

If you oppose the government's Internet censorship plan sign the EFA petition at:

www.efa.org.au/epetition

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

giggle

Hilarious that Anonymous' attack on the government websites is stopping people from using them, which is irresponsible, but government stopping people using websites is fine.

thoughts?

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

I agree with you

That the government is happy to inflict denial of service upon any Australian seeking to visit a site the government deems ‘unwanted’ pretty much leads to frustrated Australian internet users responding in kind.
Especially considering the sheer arrogance of Conroy with his mocking, laughing at and just plain ignoring the vast number of orthodox protesters to his plans for censorship lunacy.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Agree

@giggle.
Completely agree. Not to mention its okay to march through the CBD and stop services/traffic etc to the public but digital versions are not ok?

Another example of this goverments Luddite like views.

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Huh?

"Denial-of-service [DOS] attacks on government websites are totally irresponsible and potentially deny services to the Australian public," a spokesperson for Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said

THATS WHAT THE FILTER IS DOING.... why does this guy still have a job?

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

condemned the attacks..

well it seems that they are not listening to the voices of the people

so what do we have left? DOD attack on the their sites proves people wont take this rubbish laying down

Still a DOD attack is working on these sites?
great IT department the government must have.....

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Irony

I think its ironic that Minister Conroy calls these attacks irresponsible as they may potentially deny services to the public. Isn't that the entire point of the protest? To show that no one should deny information to the public. It's a bit like bus drivers during the Civil Rights movement complaining that African Americans were denying people seats in the front of the bus

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Why?

Why is it okay for them to censor what they see as inappropriate and when Anonymous does it, it's "irresponsible"?

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Because Goebells Conroy believe he's on a mission for the Furher

Conroy is demonstrating his mistaken belief that he knows better than the general public and thus the removal of human rights via censorship is perfectly justified.

If you don't like what you find on the internet, stop searching for it or ignore it.

As for the 'what about the little kiddies' rants how about taking responsibility for what you let children look at.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

I hate this plan

"The government welcomes public debate on the merits of ISP filtering" What about public debate on the stupidity, or damage that it will do to our IT industry.
What investor will take an IT startup here seriously when during the presentation they can't get to their own site or another specific one that has been innadvertently blocked.
I hate this plan with every fibre of my being. I am not about to join the DOS but I have protested peacfully and will continue to do so, my vote has changed and I don't know what I will do if it goes through, probably subvert it and teach anyone who wants to know how to.

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

geneus

i see these attacks as a good thing!
if the goverment wants to stop people from using there basic rights of freedom of speech over the internet, people should stand against it.
by commiting to these attacks i think that these people are showing the goverment wat these laws will do to people involved in porn (most are honist people making a living) by censoring the goverments sites
i hope these attacks contunue

AnonymousAnonymous February 10th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Is it open for debate?

"The government welcomes public debate on the merits of ISP [internet service provider] filtering". Oh yeah? Seriously? Thats a two faced lie. I haven't found anyone who regularly uses the internet who agrees with the filter, and everyone from ISP's, users, to myself have already stated why the filters are useless (many times, in detail). Any sensible political party should have listened by now and agreed. They would only be effective if they arrested people from anonymising themselves on the internet (they already tried that in SA though, and that would spark riots VERY quickly).

Everyone on the internet knows that there are already ways to protect kids, and we also all know, that Tor is a 2 click free way to override the censorship anyway (making it a waste of money). This filter is aimed at parents who have never used a computer in their life, will never believe that their children do anything wrong (and even when they do, they will blame others), and finally, are too lazy to watch their kids. THE FILTER WONT WORK. And Conroy is a damned liar, it isn't up for debate. If it had been up for public debate on TV (and the blacklist was shown on TV and revealed how many legal sites were on it), the debate would be quickly lost. I'll believe you Conroy when its a public debate. Get a proper computer degree before you start making clueless computing laws.

Honestly, I think its good that anonymous is silencing the government websites, and I hope they silence the government even more during elections. After all, they aren't listening to us, and I think that living the "rich" lifestyle for so long has made them forget who voted for them

In fact, it seriously makes me consider if I want to do a proper politics/law course, so at least someone in government is qualified enough to discuss IT matters.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

SUPPORT ANONYMOUS

Full support to Anonymous on this - The Government is not listening and is decieving the people on this issue - sadly sometimes drastic actions are needed to bring the issue to light .
This is from a Labour voter for 28 years but they wont get my vote if this goes through

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Political BS

@giggle = spot on

why don't people see the BS Conroy and Co are spinning?

... but then again the majority still believe in Santa's big brother God.

Still, anything that draws attention to the real issue is a good thing. The more the merrier.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Open letter concerning Australian Internet Censorship.

To whom it may concern, and for the unaware public.

Do not be confused about the intentions behind our attacks on various Australian government websites. Various media have falsely reported that our efforts are in defence of pornography. This is not about pornography. This is about freedom. The fact remains that under this proposed Internet censorship scheme over time the freedoms of Australians will continue to be eroded, all in the name of saving us from a threat that exists only in the minds of a vocal and very uninformed minority who wish to impose their morals and values on the public at large. We are in no way encouraging child pornography; however other courses of action should be encouraged, for Australia's "Cyber Safety Plan" creates problems in itself.

The fact is that "banned" content can be posted on ANY website, at any time; introducing these tools is only a way to silence the selected few. Once the tools are put into place, they can and will be abused, as it has happened throughout history. Costs to taxpayers are estimated to be $44.2 million. This money could be put to far better use. Furthermore, the creation of such an announced filter is in direct violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Charter of 1948, Article 19; which states: "Everyone has the right of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

No democratic government should ever favour one community's views over others, be it religious, political or otherwise; it is discriminatory toward minority groups. This censorship has been nothing more than a modern day prohibition and attack against freedoms that the Australian populace previously enjoyed.

We will not back down until this illicit censorship has been removed; the freedoms and rights of the Australian public must be restored. Further attacks will continue on a much larger scale in a wide variety of forms. Attempts to stop us will only bring more negative publicity to this internet censorship campaign and make the Australian government look disgraceful in the eyes of the international public.

We are Anonymous. We do not forgive. We do not forget. We are Legion. Expect us.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Irresponsible!?

All heroic acts involve some irresponsibility!! It involves risks and courage!! Glad to see supporting comments to these heroes!!

Down to censorship and tyranny!!

Long life to Anons united at Ebauns!!

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Conroy and Co caused this mess.

No sympathy from me here Conroy and Co. You have created this monster with your pathetic censorship scheme. And in the Hungry Beast interview you know next to nothing about how RC material is handled!.

Conrudd and Co its your fault for this and serves you right!

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Denying services?

And here all this time I thought disabling the PM and Labor Party sites would be considered a _service_ to Australia... fancy that.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Conroy doesn't want debate so he gets this instead

Basically Conroy says he wants debate and then at every opportunity he shuts it down, derails it or accuses those who question him as being supporters of filth. If he won't allow debate and won't listen to reason then this is what he gets... and you know what his filter will do NOTHING to stop this sort of thing continuing. Enjoy your pariah-dom Senator.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Everyone has the right of opinion and expression

I am in total agreement with what Anonymous are doing.
They are only denying public access to non-essential services. I don't see any difference to an online protest like this and marching in the streets denying access to buildings, etc.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Will Not Help The Cause!

At first I thought this was funny what Anonymous were doing and I even was saying "good on them " but after much thought I realised it was nothing more than Cyber terrorism - yes this is what it is - and that it will not help achieve what we want, you need faces and names to change politicians. Rallys and petitions are more of the way to go but even then the chances of stopping the filtering are hard and long road (look back in histor)

For those that think it's funny or ironic that they the government is compaining about the shuting down of government sites, you can't compare sites that provide information and assistance for people that really need it to those that Anonymous are trying to prevent from being filter, ie porn sites. I'm all for the porn infact my favourite fetish is cartoon porn of women (not children) with small breasts ejaculating on one another, but it will not help the cause to attack resources which are providing assistance to other people.

Make noise other ways.. Sign petitions, make mass phone calls to the department, write emails/letters complaining, hold a rally or join in other ways and make sure to let your friends, colleagues, and everyone you can know and to help out.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Career fool

Conroy is a technically illiterate hack.
His bungles are mounting, one after the other.

NBN?
Lets see, First round cancelled, Second round overly ambitious, delayed, expensive, and already has evidence of jobs for the boys.
Not one shovel has been lifted yet.
Like a council worker, he's standing there, leaning on his shovel and waiting for the bobcat guy to rock up.

I wish we could vote to cancel the pensions of useless fools like him.
Sadly no. Like that previous crazy leader of labour, he will get a pension for life.
How do these idiots deserve that?
Most of them have all the business acumen and experience of a pope.
Career politicians. Talk the talk, never had to learn to crawl.

The only up side I can see, is that eventually his utter arrogant incompetence will become so apparent that his allies will abandon him.

The bitter irony of it all is, these catchphrase 'cyber criminals' have more competence in their fingers than the government whom are trying to restrict us.

Why are our government sourced from politics and law?
The minister for health should be a role limited to nominees who were/are the best hospital directors.
The minister for Treasury should come from the vast pool of successful businesses.
The minister for transport should have some experience in freight, and especially policing.

Why are we letting these book smart, ignorant idealists waste our freedoms, taxes and lives?

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Irresponsibility ?

First off i'd like to categorically state that this is no longer an issue isolated to Australia. Policy that effects the internet effects the world. the internet is a global info exchange system and the fact that the Australian government fails to recognize this displays a stunning degree of incompetence. Secondly civil disobedience is not irresponsible, neither is it terrorism. The difference is that terrorism is directed at a mostly unsuspecting population base inorder to force a government to action. These attacks have been directed exclusively at the Aus government.

Does anyone else see the humor in a group who is working to remove access to content accussing their detractors of doing the same thing?

Also word to the wise. The Church of Scientology didn't take Anonymous seriously at first. that was before the whole world acknowledged them for the loonies they are. The Australian government is being irresponsible in ignoring what they don't ultimately understand.

kingmobkingmob February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

I have to agree

DDoS attacks on a government site do not workably fit the definition of "terrorism". Did the reporter (Ben Grubb) honestly feel that his life, or his livelihood, were genuinely in danger? I don't think so.

I am not "Anonymous", but I do have an interest in monitoring their activities. CONroy is well warned: once Anonymous have you in their sights THEY WON'T STOP. They are like a plague--for every ONE that you knock down 100 will rise in their place.

To keep party-political in line, each party has a "whip"--if an "anon" gets out of line he faces much more than a dressing-down by someone carrying the "title" of whip!

Anonymous WAS a small bunch of u.s. teenagers out for a bit of a lark--it is now a world-wide meme. Ignore it at your own peril.

MicMic February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

aph.gov.au still down

aph.gov.au is still inaccessible as of 11:38am, Thursday the 11th of February. How long has it been, now?

Also having trouble getting the Department of Broadband site to load, though it doesn't seem to be down entirely.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

aph.gov.au still down

2pm and still inaccesible. Also some other sites such as the cyber security bunch are offline.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

It's the 12th now

And aph.gov.au is still down.

AnonymousAnonymous February 12th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

People should not be afraid of their governments.

Governments should be afraid of their people.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Operation Titstorm

This is most definitely a win, just for making reporters use the word Titstorm. Thanks for the lulz anonymous.

AnonymousAnonymous February 11th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

What is so bad about self-defense?

Finally, some heroic Patriots decided to fight for the freedom of the Internet. I condemn the Fascists in Australia and their fascist legislation and I applaud the works of Anonymous. Anonymous should shut the Australian government down permanently until they learn that freedom of speech is sacred and absolute.

AnonymousAnonymous February 12th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

Woohoo

I'm glad these people did what they did, it makes sense when it requires millions of dollars to lobby for changes what this means is the law is unaccessible to the general public, it's only accessible to those with deep pockets. Therefore it is logical they would respond in this way especially when petitions are being ignored. Stephen Conroy and his Cooney Kevin Rudd need to taken out of the government and have their **** handed to them, especially for making accusations that anyone that isn't for the filter is a child porn supporter. That is the most ridiculous and absurd statement and basically labels anyone whos against the filter a childporn supporter which is nothing short of libel. But you know since government officials get immunity from that, well why shouldn't i have immunity??? eqaulity before the law is paramount if there is no equality then some are higher than others and thus get treated differently.

xx February 12th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)

ironic

isnt it abit ironic that Conroy thinks its irresponsible because it potentially denies the public services.

Thats what his filter will do, is it only irresponsible when others do it, i guess he thinks he gets a free pass.

I only hope that the liberals get into power with the upcoming election and conroy finds himself in a position to be kicked repeatedly in the balls.

AnonymousAnonymous February 13th, 2010
Report offensive content Reply (0) (0)
Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

ZDNet Australia Live

A user from Melbourne measured 509kbps @ Broadband Speedtest.

3 minutes ago, Click here to find out how fast your internet speed is.

RT @seesmic: Seesmic listed by @ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

@Justin_Bartak Thanks for all the RTs! Taking a look at the guts inside Apple's new Magic Trackpad - http://bit.ly/a4OBFm #Minneapolis #Mac

RT @seesmic: Seesmic listed by @ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitr... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu #mobile #apps

Sigh. RT @TechZader: Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://bit.ly/cxedPj

For the iPad that has everything http://bit.ly/9EJLFz

유용한 안드로이드 어플 추천 RT@ZDNet - Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best http://ping.fm/goi9K

RT @ZDNet Microsoft: We are focusing on eight core businesses http://zd.net/ajzANC

David, you've completely missed the point. This has nothing to do with consumer value. You mentioned that "Telstra is supposed...

9 minutes ago by M.N.M on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

not sure about marketing.. "I'm a phone too": by @maryjofoley: http://bit.ly/ayVAmg

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit - ZDNet (blog) http://bit.ly/b4FjzF

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when... http://bit.ly/cDwY4t

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit: Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when... http://bit.ly/9yAlXu

When online communities go to work http://bit.ly/bAaip0

Top 25 Android apps: The best of the best | ZDNet http://m.zdnet.com/blog/btl/top-25-android-apps-the-best-of-the-best/37363

Why Facebook is better than Quora...or is it? - ZDNet (blog) http://bit.ly/csQ2Gq

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit http://bit.ly/bZUp31

For the iPad that has everything http://bit.ly/9EJLFz

Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one': One of the most pressing questions on investors' and s... http://bit.ly/cyqr98

Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 slates are 'job number one': One of the most pressing questions on investors' and s... http://bit.ly/cyqr98

Yup! They're pretty and look real nice but, as one who qualified in 1963 - on a Diesel Boat - and retired in 1982 - after 6 more die...

12 minutes ago by willyjon on Get wet with submarine tech photos

Microsoft: We are focusing on eight core businesses (Mary Jo Foley/All about Microsoft Blog) http://bit.ly/bPYRff

BlackBerry encryption 'too secure': National security vs. consumer privacy | ZDNet http://ow.ly/1qMcw3 #privacy #p2#tlot #aynrand #tlot

Ken Turner (footballer) : Steve Ballmer: Microsoft has been focusing on cloud for 15 years - ZDNet (blog) http://bit.ly/b21h6z

Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 marketing pitch: 'I'm a phone too' http://bit.ly/cxedPj

Dell's Alienware makes a big splash in Bangalore with gaming cafe http://bit.ly/aGUEXE

MasterChefs launch iPhone 4 in Sydney - http://dld.bz/prSR I really want 1, would you get 1? http://dld.bz/prSS

"Not greatly dissimilar to the public jubilation felt at the end of the second World War, Sydney-siders ..." http://bit.ly/cTvyuB #reallysad

Hilarious coverage of the iPhone 4 launch from the CNET guys. http://bit.ly/cTvyuB

What a sad way to live if the only joy in your life is to queue for a piece of defective technology sold by a vendor who accused his loya...

2 hours ago by fred9999 on iPhone 4 Australian launch: pictures

@Jetttje: outlook-alternatieven: http://www.zdnet.com.au/top-alternatives-to-microsoft-outlook-339295046.htm

RT @NASAWatch: NASA photos mooned in abandoned Maccas (LOIRP) http://bit.ly/arFI4Y

http://bit.ly/9y8rsU Multimedia Toolbar Icons - Free Software Downloads - ZDNet Australia

I am happy to know I was right about predicting Symantec's stock price and the furture trend. As I have pointed out a few times, I th...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

Just weirdly found out Michael Yell - Country and Regional Director for OEM, XSP and Services Business at Symantec Asia Pacific and Japan...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

As I have reported to Symantec Ethics about David Freer’s (VP, Symantec – Norton, APJ) misconducts (fraud, having dissented sex with ...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

David Freer (VP, Symantec Consumer Business Units - Norton, APJ) is a BIG LIAR! He lied to me for more than two and half years for my tru...

7 hours ago by strelaoz on iPhone midnight launches across Australia

My speed is 33 807 I'm with bigpond cable

9 hours ago by francoo on Broadband Speedtest

That is a beautiful boat,but, I'd still rather go to sea on a first flight 688 boat.Preferably the 689 if Clinton hadn't decommis...

9 hours ago by rogue689 on Get wet with submarine tech photos

For many other reasons, than just the net filter, the current has to go. Still, I wouldn't trust Abbot either. There are however chec...

10 hours ago by ian_from_oz on Conroy's filter masterstroke

RT: @zdnetaustralia: http://bit.ly/cJU6Mf We've added Virgin to our iPhone 4 pricing table comparison.. See which telco has the best deal.

The pick: five business iPad apps http://fb.me/DOid8NXt

Apple to look at iPhone 3G iOS 4 problems - Software - News http://bit.ly/cmaTAJ _ that's nice of them

Stop trying to dodge the filter issue, Conboy; it'll bite you in the **** whether you like it or not.

13 hours ago by Hyperion on Conroy pledges NBN map, same policies

@merejames http://bit.ly/9YJ6e7

Facebook va lansa un serviciu de răspunsuri la întrebările utilizatorilor http://bit.ly/aS4kLC

Survey proves #AUS e-health demand http://j.mp/ah9Iwf /via @ZDNetAustralia

A "profound cultural change" is required for a truly open government http://bit.ly/bTht86 /via @zdnetaustralia #gov2au

As one who has been as critical as any of the Sol era Telstra...as long as Telstra are leaving feasible room for profit margins for their...

15 hours ago by RS on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

David, while the popular opinion, at least in the eyes of Telstra opponents, is to use every devious argument to stifle the operations of...

15 hours ago by sydneyla on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Question two: What is stopping.... "AUSTRALIANS could save up to $1.9 billion a year in travel costs, petrol and time if they spent h...

15 hours ago by Vasso Massonic on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

Survey proves e-health demand: NEHTA http://itrau.com/bt9f8w via @ZDNetAustralia

David, please elaborate on Telstra's response, stating competitors could gain network access for "as Little as $2.50 a month...

15 hours ago by Vasso Massonic on Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog?

RT @zdnetaustralia: Survey by NEHTA proves there is a demand for e-health http://bit.ly/bXuT1K

RT @zdnetaustralia: Telstra cops $18.55 million fine for exchange capping http://bit.ly/9cL91V

RT @zdnetaustralia: Survey by NEHTA proves there is a demand for e-health http://bit.ly/bXuT1K #yam

A good read..RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

RT @zdnetaustralia: eBay and the Trading Post online help the Australian Taxation Office catch tax cheats http://bit.ly/dBDXRz

RT @zdnetaustralia Tesltra tweaks its data plans for all smartphones (not just the iPhone 4) http://bit.ly/bxO0G2

RT @zdnetaustralia: Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

Is Telstra the scorpion or the frog? http://bit.ly/cSgC31

@mibus http://www.zdnet.com.au/commbank-dives-into-580m-banking-it-revamp-339288467.htm

The tech keeping Plastiki afloat: photos: ZDNet Australia brings you the tech below deck on the epic Plastiki voyage. http://bit.ly/aTj1QU

http://bit.ly/cJU6Mf We've added virgin to our iPhone 4 pricing table comparison.. See which telco has the best deal.

This story has been liked 5 times in the last 24 hours!