Ultimate anti-spam guide: 11 products tested


Contents
Introduction
BitDefender
Clearswift
CA eTrust
GFI
IronPort
MailGuard
McAfee
MessageLabs
NetIQ
Network Box
Symantec
Specifications
Editor's Choice
About RMIT
How we tested

CA eTrust Secure Content Manager v1.0

Once the installation routine is commenced the operator is given the choice of setting the station type, either Master or Slave, and then selecting the type of scanning required by the application, either HTTP/FTP, or SMTP, or both.

Naturally, while this application has the added feature of being able to act as a content filter as well as a SMTP filter we chose SMTP as this is a anti-spam review not a content filter review.

Once a few more quick wizards are gone through the application is installed and ready to go. Overall the installation and base configuration is very straightforward.

Interestingly, this application is designed to run in a distributed environment and can report back to a central machine which would gather information from a number of installed nodes on the network, making it a boon for those with plenty of remote offices.

Likewise the quarantine manager can be centralised on a separate system making the mail administrators role easier too.

Overall a neat application definitely suited to remote/distributed environments. Again CA have used a familiar interface and adopted a very straight forward approach.

Click to enlarge
Product eTrust Secure Content Manager 1.1
Price US$55 per node (for full suite)
Vendor Computer Associates
Phone 1800 999 985
Web www.ca.com/etrust
 
Interoperability
Works with any mail server, designed to work easily over several mail servers.
Futureproofing ½
A good range of features and good reporting is provided.
ROI ½
Average.
Service
Very good -- 12 months warranty included.
Rating

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Where can I buy Symantec Brigh ...Anonymous -- 23/04/05

    Where can I buy Symantec Brightmail Anti-Spam v6.01? please

    We trialled both Mailguard &am ...Anonymous -- 01/06/05

    We trialled both Mailguard & MessageLabs.

    MessageLabs is seemingly run out of the UK. To make a simple change required talking to someone in the UK, faxing a form to the UK, and waiting for them to be available.

    Not ideal.

    RE: MailGuard propaganda posts Anonymous -- 21/02/08 (in reply to #120117717)

    Geez, i wonder which of the two firms the anonymous poster is aligned to?? MessageLabs have a sydney office, have far a greater number of and far larger australian client base than MailGuard, and have never experienced the service outages that plague MailGuards poorly conceived and architected systems. Ever heard of availability & capacity management?? How bout mis-leading and deceptive conduct, alla "100% uptime" as is claimed in your marketing. Sub 25 seats, where you dont rely that heavily on your email, use MailGuard as they are cheap. > 50 seats, use MessageLabs, or Postini or Microsoft (whom acquired Frontbridge in 2006). You get what you pay for afterall.

    Messagelabs propaganda post Anonymous -- 02/09/09 (in reply to #320095926)

    Geez, I wonder which company the above anonymous poster is aligned to!

Add your opinion

Back to top

Featured