Norton Internet Security 2006

There's good and bad news in Symantec Norton Internet Security 2006. The good news is that the best-selling Norton suite does a fine job thwarting Internet-bred assaults, including viruses, worms, hacker intrusions, and the like. The new Security Inspector tool uncovers unsafe browser settings and Windows passwords, and Norton now prevents hijackers from changing your browser's home page.

The bad news is that, like its top competitor, McAfee Internet Security Suite 2006, the AU$129.95 (AU$118.14 download) Norton takes a toll on PC performance, particularly during system scans. It also offers mediocre technical support. However, it remains a solid upgrade for longtime users, who will benefit from Norton's improved spam and phishing e-mail filters. Everyone else should shop around for a better deal. ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 6 offers similar performance with significantly less impact on system resources.

Set up and interface
Norton Internet Security 2006 is easy to install: a few clicks, and the program does the rest. But easy and fast are two different animals. Norton's setup may take hours if you decide to run the optional postinstallation scan. In our tests, basic setup, which includes software installation, rebooting, downloading updated files, and configuring security settings, took about 30 minutes -- roughly the same as McAfee Internet Security Suite 2006. But Norton's optional postsetup antivirus scan added another 1 hour, 45 minutes to the process. While this was 30 minutes less than McAfee Internet Security Suite 2006 took, Norton rendered our PC virtually unusable for other tasks while it worked. Technically, we could use our test machine with Norton AntiVirus actively scanning in the background, but whenever Microsoft Word takes more than two minutes to launch, you're better off reading a book.

Norton Internet Security 2006 keeps the intuitive interface design from previous versions. The home screen, known as the Norton Protection Center, provides links to major security components, including virus and worm protection, a firewall, and e-mail and instant-messenger scanning. Many users won't ever tinker with individual component settings and may choose to rely on the Norton Protection Center console instead. Unfortunately, we found some of the console's protection information inaccurate or misleading.


The Norton Protection Center displays a snapshot of your PC's security status, but some of its information is misleading.

On our test PC, for instance, the Protection Center listed "No Coverage" under the Data Recovery heading, meaning our PC had no protection against disk crashes, missing files, or installation disasters -- this, even though we had a copy of Uniblue WinBackup installed. A link marked "Learn how to fully protect this category" led to a Symantec Web page touting Norton SystemWorks 2006. Frankly, we'd like to see the Protection Center recognise installed non-Symantec applications -- and keep advertising clearly marked as such.


This omnipresent Norton Internet Security 2006 icon gives you an at-a-glance colour-coded view of your system's overall security.

On the Windows desktop, Norton inserts a colour-coded status icon within the Taskbar. A green check mark means you're fully protected; a red X spells trouble. Pop-up messages warn you when Norton detects danger -- for example, whenever a new virus hits your system -- and offers a suggestion to repair the problem. In general, the frequency and the number of pop-ups were not overwhelming.

Features
Norton Internet Security 2006 has improved over the last year, thanks to a handful of worthy, if unspectacular, enhancements. For instance, a new feature called Security Inspector finds, and in some cases patches, potential security holes, including weak browser settings and Windows passwords. In our tests, Norton Security Inspector accurately detected and changed (after asking permission) several insecure Internet Explorer settings. It also discovered -- but didn't fix -- problems with our Windows passwords. Specifically, it found that our Windows XP administrator and other users had a "weak or missing password," and it suggested improvements such as using a password of at least eight characters with one or more nonalphanumeric characters. According to Symantec, Norton intentionally doesn't suggest secure passwords or automatically change them for you.

The new Norton Home Page Hijacking Protection feature is another nice addition. As its name implies, it prevents a rogue site from making itself your browser's home page -- an all-too-common problem for inexperienced Web surfers. That said, many free utilities, including HijackThis, already provide this same service. We also like Norton's much-improved firewall, which does a better job of automatically creating firewall rules -- that is, deciding which programs need Net access -- without pestering you for advice.

Unfortunately, Norton's new spyware protection should be even more aggressive. For instance, we were able to download and install WeatherCast, a free program known to contain adware -- before Norton offered to remove it. By contrast, McAfee Internet Security Suite 2006 warned us before we started downloading WeatherCast.


Norton Internet Security 2006 kills spyware but could do a better job of preventing these programs from downloading in the first place.

Speed? Unfortunately, Norton Internet Security 2006 is as slow as a slug. With Norton Internet Security 2006 running, Microsoft Word files took an extra two to three seconds to load; Outlook e-mails took several seconds longer to send. And Norton AntiVirus 2006 scans rendered our test PC useless for other tasks. True, if you run your scans at odd hours, you're fine. But don't try to work while Norton AntiVirus is scanning; Word took more than 2 minutes to load. In a comparison with the McAfee antivirus app, Norton took 1 hour, 45 minutes to scan a 19GB disk partition, while McAfee Internet Security Suite 2006 was even slower, taking an extra 30 minutes to scan the same partition. However, McAfee offers a reasonable trade-off: Microsoft Word loaded in 26 seconds during our McAfee scans -- slow, certainly, but not unbearably so.

Service and support
If you run into problems with Norton Internet Security 2006, you can get help via free online chat or paid telephone support. Symantec offers both 24/7. Symantec's support site, however, needs a redesign; the link to the free online chat was extremely hard to find. After fumbling around, we discovered the free-chat link only after clicking the "Continue to phone support" link. Phone support costs AU$76.95 per incident for a standard consultation or AU$131.95 for a premier consultation.

We'd like to see better-trained tech reps too. Our online chat rep vanished for two to three minutes between each of our questions, during which he said he was "referring to documents." Translation: he didn't know his stuff. In responding to our simplest question -- How do you run Norton Security Inspector? -- he e-mailed instructions five hours later.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Norton NIS 2006- What a troubled little program Anonymous -- 12/12/05 (in reply to #120125004)

    Where do I start, hmm, ok there are problems with this applciation that you need to stear clear of. User sesssion lock ups, Client and security platform locks ups, (ccApp.exe) errors rpeorted by Micrsoft on line crash. NPC (Norton Protection Centre) has a freeze then 10,99 "service data base is locked" error, then it disappears, then does the NIS icon in the tray. and all I can get Symantec Tech Support to do is help me with uninstall and install it. Patch People thats what is needed!!!.. keep the NIS2005 application.

    Also caution on the NRT, ( Norton removal tool) it will take everything norton and I mean remove it..(Password manager too) and then you need to install a windows patch. Way too much trouble Symantec. "Very dissapoiting" is the kindest words I can muster

    Same horrible experience with Norton Internet Security 2006 John Wheeler -- 02/02/06

    I have had the same horrible experience with Norton Internet Security 2006. It blocked my POP email accounts and the ccapp.exe kept crashing.

    Norton support was worthless. I have been using Norton Internet Security for 5 to 6 years now, buying a new version every year. They wanted to charge me for support on the phone after they hung up on my online chat. They were completely inept (of the three agents I spoke with only one spoke English good enough for us to effectively communicate).

    They did not point me to the patch or the removal tool, but simply to uninstall and install, which failed to correct the problem.

    After telling them everything they wanted to know right off the bat, they still hosed me over and made me jump through the hoops and into the wonderful land of "I'm now an irate customer".

    I hope I am NEVER dumb enough to purchase another Norton Security product or influence my business or others to buy it.

    What a complete nightmare. Hours and hours lost and nothing good came from it. Way to go Symantec!

    Norton Internet Security 2006 Anonymous -- 24/07/06

    I have just removed the above, however I am unable to remove the icon on the task bar on desktop, it is disabled. I then tried to re-install this softwae but it won`t re-install while the icon is still there

    help Anonymous -- 12/12/06

    hi guys. i have a problem. im a dad and i forgot my password so i cant go to sites that i need to go to for work. please help me to find if there is a way to try and get my password. cheers .

    Norton Inetrnet security Anonymous -- 19/12/06

    It would be nice if reviewers of this sort of software would:

    1. compare alternative offereings with some sort of rating scale
    2. actually review what the software and the vendors do when things doin't go right.

    i currently use NIS because the previous product PC-Cillin introduced a bug as part of a regular update that crashed the system - could only start in safe mode. It took quite a lot of effort to diagnose that condition and it wasn't an accident - once isolated, very repetaable. If the vendor could make that sort of mistake, i wantyed no part of it . .

    But Norton seems tarred with a similar brush. The back-up cycles I use have gotten a workout over the years and the most common reason for using it (7 out of 8 events) is a corruption or failure of the AV or internet security system software - not an infection, or system crash but simply something corrupts and it's all over rover. . The vendors seem quite capable of detecting an error, but their solution seems to be always - unintsall and then re-install - with the resultant wated time effort and download bandwidth. If you new car did this, there would be a real song-and-dance about it.

    Which is really ****-poor design, and we actually pay for it without realising the defective nature of the product.

    So, why can't the reviewers publish reviews whoich compare the productrs, and particularly, break it and then see how easy the product and vendor responds in fixing it.

Add your opinion

Reviews by category

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Welcome to National Censorship Day
    Conroy's blind adherence to his net filtering plan will abandon Net neutrality ideals and push ISPs down a slippery slope of unprecedented responsibility for a callously politicised Australian Internet.
  • Array That sinking Tcard feeling
    There's something terribly unsettling about realising that the NSW Government is considering hiring a company to build a new electronic ticketing system which has already put it through the legal wringer for the system's predecessor.
  • Array The challenge of government 2.0
    The Government 2.0 Taskforce released its draft report last week, and its recommendations for Open Government almost reads like a manifesto. Stilgherrian's guest on Patch Monday this week is the chair of the Taskforce, Nicholas Gruen.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured