Hitting the suite spot: McAfee Vs Norton

By
24 November 2003 10:20 AM
Tags: norton internet security, mcafee, head, 2004, suite, 6.0, thanks
Hitting the suite spot: McAfee Vs Norton We put Norton and McAfee's latest Internet security suites head to head.

The concept of suites of software designed to protect you against all the various nasty things that can happen to your PC while online is a relatively new one, but it's taken very little time for the two heavyweights in consumer antivirus protection, Network Associates and Symantec, to get on board with annually renewing security packages.

As a consumer, however, picking which package will best protect you can be tricky. We've put this year's iterations of McAfee Internet Security and Norton Internet Security head to head to sort out the winners from the also-rans.

McAfee Internet Security 6.0
McAfee Internet Security 6.0
McAfee Internet Security 6.0 is fine, but Norton Internet Security 2004 is a better deal, thanks to superior spam filtering.


 

Norton Internet Security 2004
Norton Internet Security 2004
An excellent all-in-one PC defence: Norton Internet Security 2004 is the best all-in-one security suite, thanks to its fine spam filter.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    No Dice for the home user For ...Anonymous -- 24/02/04

    No Dice for the home user

    For my money neither of these two packages would work. Trend Labs PC-Cillin has a better catch rate
    for all web born nasties. RMIT labs testing proves this.

    When coupled with Zone alarm 4.5 Pro you have excellent security that you dont have to be an Einestein to configure.

    I've always been a longstandin ...Anonymous -- 16/04/04

    I've always been a longstanding opponent of Norton products. Ever since the 1990's when Norton's products were about as effective as a band-aid on a chest wound. Back then, F-prot was king. And, to a large extent, it's still a great anti-virus. However, security suites are more popular are more effective due to integrated features between the firewall and the AV.

    On recent client had Norton installed on his system, and I advocated McAfee's suite instead. Shortly after installation and updates, the anti-virus picked up SIX (6) undesired programs that Norton had totally MISSED. Including a keylogger that I suspect might have had something to do with his credit card number being stolen.

    Norton hasn't been effective in the 90's, and I don't believe the company has improved it's since either.

    McAfee's SpamKiller is also VERY effective at stopping spam dead. It's a fair rival for any spam program Norton puts out.

    All in all, McAfee is better in most aspects, especially the ever crucial Anti-Virus.

    I have used both Norton and Mc ...Anonymous -- 14/05/04

    I have used both Norton and Mcafee anti-virus software. I have found that Mcafee is a lot more flexible than Norton. I have also found that Norton uses a lot more system resources than Mcafee.

    I did notice that Norton jamms up windows OS more than Mcafee does. I have used Mcafee for years and have had far less problems than with Norton.

    We have had Norton for a couple of years at the office because our IT manager thought it was a better product. We no longer have that IT manager because of poor decisions and poor practices. We will soon be loosing Norton Antivirus

    Though I am a Linux geek On PC ...Anonymous -- 05/07/04

    Though I am a Linux geek On PCs and consider Linux immune to Windows viruses but still I have XP on my laptop that came pre-installed when I purchased this laptop. The only reason of using XP at the moment is WiFi. So as soon as Centrino is capble of being used on Linux, I'll say bye bye to XP. Sad but I wont be using Mcafee either.

    Anyway, I have used Nortron in mid 90s and got rid of it as soon I tested Mcafee. I think Mcafee is a geat product, why? It is not using as much as systems resources as Nortron does. The current version of Mcafee is great. I am not using MIS6 instead I have purchased Mcafee 8. I dont need firewall because I am running my own dedicated firewall but I have seen the MIS6 firewall and must say that is not bad at all.

    If one is not able to afford Mcafee then they should consider AVG (Free Antivirus). Though I'd recommend Mcafee.

Add your opinion

Reviews by category

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured