Eight e-mail virus scanners tested

Clearswift MailSweeper 4.3 for SMTP

Clearswift MailSweeper 4.3 for SMTPThe installation is straightforward with two or three basic configuration questions to answer before the package is loaded. The server application can be installed separately from the management console which can be installed on another machine.

The right-hand window of the management console has shortcuts to wizards that allow the system administrator to complete the custom configuration of their new application, including adding licences, and information on adding third-party antivirus scanners.

The beauty of this application is that it has the ability to purchase and incorporate third-party developed antivirus support from F-Secure, Command, H+BEDV, and Sophos. Depending on what level of antivirus security you need, the package can scale without having to buy separate new applications.

Administration is via the same management console as the configuation. There is a very comprehensive reporting toolset provided under the main MailSweeper menu as well as excellent support for setting up policies and administrative alerts.

Overall a very neat and simple package with all the necessary custom configuration and administration tools well placed within the one interface.

 Antivirus scanners

 Mail server antivirus packages:
 Clearswift MailSweeper
 Computer Associates eTrust
 F-Secure Antivirus
 GFI MailSecurity
 Netbox Micro
 NetIQ MailMarshal
 Sophos MailMonitor
 Trend Micro ScanMail

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT
Product MAILsweeper for SMTP
Price From AU$2,423 for 50 users (approx $48 per user)
Vendor Clearswift
Phone 02 9424 1200
Web www.clearswift.com.au
 
Interoperability
Suports Exchange 2000 & 2003.
Futureproofing
Four engines supported.
ROI
Average price, but subscription to the engines is extra.
Service
Additional AU$606, or about $12 per user.
Rating ½

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    Unfortunately mailmarshal's re ...Anonymous -- 22/06/04

    Unfortunately mailmarshal's reporting of problems to the sender leaves a lot to be desired. It's reports are amongst the least useful of any mail gateway software on the market, failing to include the headers of the original message, and typically misidentifying or not identifying the sender and recipients.

    As someone who sees a lot of bounces from mailing list traffic, I'm sick of not knowing which addresses are supposed to be removed from the list.

Back to top

Featured