More security applications: Latest | Best | Top 10

ESET NOD32 3.0 Antivirus System (Windows)

By Robert Vamosi, CNET.com on 26 May 2008 10:32 AM

Tags: eset, nod32, antivirus, windows, test, advanced, seconds, scan

Eset NOD32 3.0 delivers an easy-to-use version of its award-winning antivirus engine. Although our performance testing was mixed, NOD32 continues to rank among the best-rated antivirus products by independent antivirus testing labs.

Setup and interface
NOD32 is among the few antivirus products that still supports Windows 2000 and XP as well as Windows Vista.

With version 3, Eset finally gets the NOD32 interface right. After years of dealing with the cumbersome AMON (monitors the overall file system), DMON (monitors documents), and EMON (monitors e-mail transactions), we get version 3.0 with a completely intuitive and easy-to-use interface. There are two versions of the interface: standard and advanced. The left-hand column features Protection Status, Computer scan, Update, Setup, Tools (in Advanced mode only), and Help. The right window pane is reserved for the active feature in use. In Advanced mode, across the top is a toolbar to access the more advanced configuration options.

At first glance, the interface is easy for anyone new to antivirus protection. But digging deeper we were happy to find all the advance tweaks that anyone could ask for within reach. Symantec has gone in the opposite direction, making all the tools simply enable and disable, but Eset has left a number of intermediate options available to the more advanced users.

Should you need to remove NOD32 from your computer, there is an uninstall option. After a reboot we found almost no evidence of the product on our machine.

Features
Eset continues to improve on its ThreatSense technology, allowing NOD32 to be proactive, yet use few system resources. We like the fact that during a scan you can either manually toggle the scan to the forefront or push it into the background.

The main enhancements to this version are the interface and behind-the-scenes tweaks to the speed of the scan.

Also, according to Eset, NOD32 will automatically remove threats, which could be bad if you need a component for a game (for example); however we found that, if necessary, you can restore any quarantined selection with a right click.

Performance
NOD32 did well in tests performed by CNET Labs' performance tests and very well in third-party, independent antivirus testing using live viruses.

On our iTunes test, NOD32 came in at 271 seconds, 2 seconds above our test system. On our Microsoft Office test, NOD32 was third fastest at 1,360 seconds. For individual file scans, NOD32 came in fourth fastest at an amazing 181 seconds. And in boot speed, NOD32 again came in slow at 35 seconds.

In terms of protecting your PC, we refer readers to two leading independent antivirus testing organizations. In the latest test results from AV-test.org, NOD32 Antivirus 3 scored 97.7 behind Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7 but ahead of Norton Antivirus 2008.

AV-Comparatives.org, in on-demand tests NOD32 found 97.7 percent of the malicious software and earned an Advanced + (highest) rating, and in Retrospective/ProActive tests found 71 percent and also earned an Advanced + (highest) rating. And NOD32 (Smart Security) was one of four products to earn CheckVir.com's Advanced rating.

Support
NOD32 provides extensive, context-sensitive help files. For example, if you are on the Actions tab and you click 'Help', NOD32 takes you to the 'Actions' tab definition page within 'Help'. It's a small touch, but other than in Kaspersky, we haven't seen it offered in any other security software.

Online, Eset provides a fairly thorough 32-page PDF-file manual for download, plus online FAQs for NOD32, links to an active user forum dedicated to the software, and a Web form for contacting Eset customer support. While there is live telephone support offered, the call is not toll free and is available only during business hours, 9 am to 4 pm Sydney time, Monday through to Friday.

Advertisement

User comments | 3 comments

Add your comment

  1. None27/05/2008, 10:37 AM

    rating 4/10

    No mention of the outage of last week where NOD32 caused Windows machines all around the world to become unresponsive?

  2. Agent2401/06/2008, 04:07 PM

    rating 7/10

    I've tried both, and I fully agree that the new interface is a lot better than the old version, It certainly suits Vista's Aero theme well too.

    At the moment I'm using the trial but already it seems very good

  3. Goyta' F. Villela Jr.18/05/2009, 11:05 AM

    rating 5/10

    A year later than this review, I am evaluating NOD32 4.0 (not 3.0) because it is one of the few antivirus programs already compatible with Windows 7 (RC). I just ran my first full scan, and configured it for "no cleaning" because I wanted to see what it found first, in case there were false alarms and I ran into trouble if it deleted valid vital files (which, as I found out, it could have done).

    There were indeed quite a few false alarms (37, to be more precise, even with heuristics set to medium) - for example, a RAR archive containing only MS-Word and PDF documents from 6 years ago that has not been opened in years, but NOD32 marked as containing a "probably unknown NewHeur_PE virus."

    The log also contained *hundreds* of archives and setup programs that it could not open and were not scanned. I was expecting to find some easy right-click option for the log entries to mark the false alarms as trusted, or clean/delete/quarantine the suspicious files, as Kaspersky does (even in the clumsy 2009 edition), but there is none. I found out that I had to manually enter all exclusions one by one in another window, then run another scan (either a full one - which takes 7 hours for my 400 GB of files - or one manually for each of the affected files or folders), this time with the "standard" or "strict" option.

    With all these problems, I am only not giving NOD32 4.0 a "poor" rating because the detection rate is really outstanding - maybe even *too* good. But I don't find it practical for routine use. I'll be trying Avira next, but I'll probably go back to Kaspersky in the end, complemented with occasional on-line scans with other programs.

    The good: Very good detection rate - probably too good. It found one real spyware infection that no other software had (both antivirus or spyware detectors). As of May 2009, it is already compatible with Windows 7 RC.

    The bad: Now the interface is *too* simple and can leave you clueless about how to do what you want - where is the option for it? Too many false alarms. It can't open and scan many kinds of archives and installation files. No easy way (e.g., right-click) to process files according to your judgment after a scan.

Overview

» Enlarge

The good:
  • Eset NOD32 3.0 offers a new interface.
  • faster scanning.
  • thorough technical support.
The bad:
  • Eset NOD32 3.0 doesn't include firewall protection.
The bottomline:

Eset NOD32 3.0 finally gets its interface right and, along with high-rated performance among independent testing labs, deserves consideration on your desktop.

RRP: AU$64.50

Editors’ rating:

7.8/10

Related topics:

eset, nod32, antivirus, windows

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Datacentre disaster lessons
    As a system administrator, the health and status of your datacentre is at the forefront of your mind. But how often do you think about the needs beyond server status and bandwidth?
  • Array E-health too unsexy for COAG
    There will always be something more politically sexy than e-health for state governments, meaning the National E-Health Transition Authority's business case for a national electronic medical record might just sit on the shelf gathering dust forever.
  • Array TelstraUnClear
    Telstra's New Zealand arm TelstraClear is one strange company ...
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured