More operating systems: Latest | Best | Top 10

Microsoft Windows 7 (Professional)

Deserved or not, Microsoft had dug itself a cool, deep, dark hole with Windows Vista. Users demanding that Redmond extend the life of Windows XP wasn't exactly something they could be proud of, either. Bombarded by complaints and negative press even after the first service pack was released, the bar had been set high for Vista's successor: Windows 7. This review is based on an official copy of the Windows 7 RTM that Microsoft provided to CNET on 30 July 2009.

Luckily for Microsoft, Windows 7 is more than just spin. It's stable, smooth and highly polished, introducing new graphical features, a new taskbar that can compete handily with the Mac OS X dock, and device management and security enhancements that make it both easier to use and safer. Importantly, it won't require the hardware upgrades that Vista demanded, partially because the hardware has caught up, and partially because Microsoft has gone to great lengths to make Windows 7 accessible to as many people as possible.

It's important to note that the public testing process for Windows 7 involved one limited-availability beta and one release candidate, and constituted what some have called the largest shareware trial period ever. As buggy and irritating as Vista was, Windows 7 isn't. Instead, it's the successor to Windows XP that Microsoft wishes Vista had been, and finally places it on competitive footing with other major operating systems like OS X and Linux.

Microsoft is offering six versions of Windows 7: Starter, Home Premium, Professional, Ultimate, OEM and Enterprise. The three versions that Redmond will be promoting most heavily are Home Premium, Professional and Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor, although Starter will also be available to consumers.

Windows 7 will support both 32- and 64-bit systems. The bare minimum requirements for the 32-bit include a 1GHz processor, 1GB RAM, 16GB available hard disk space, and a DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver. While 64-bit systems will require at least a 1GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 20GB of free space on your hard drive, and a DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver. A touchscreen monitor is required to take advantage of the native touch features. Do note that some users have claimed to have limited success running the Windows 7 beta with less than 1GB of RAM, but that's not recommended.

Installation

Microsoft is offering several paths to install Windows 7. People can buy a new computer with the operating system already installed, upgrade from Windows XP or Vista, or do a clean install on a computer the user already owns. The clean installation took us about 30 minutes, but that will vary depending on your computer.

The upgrade procedure is different depending on whether you're running Windows XP or Windows Vista. Vista users merely need to back up their data before choosing the Upgrade option from the install disc. Both XP Home and XP Pro users will have to back up their data, then choose Custom from the install disc. Custom will have the same effect as a clean install, although it'll save your old data in a folder called Windows.old. Once you choose Custom, you'll need to select the partition of your hard drive that contains Windows XP, and then follow the instructions to enter your product key and allow the computer to reboot as needed.

If you're not sure if your current computer can run Windows 7, you can download and run the Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor from Microsoft.

Features: Taskbar and Aero Peek

Although the look of Windows 7 may seem to be nothing more than some polish applied liberally to the Vista Aero theme, make no mistake: this is a full replacement operating system and more than just "Vista done right". From driver support to multi-touch groundwork for the future, from better battery management to the most easy-to-use interface Microsoft has ever had, Windows 7 is hardly half-baked.

The first thing that should stand out is the new taskbar. This is one of the best improvements Microsoft has made — third-party program dock makers are going to have to do some serious innovation when Windows 7 goes public. Besides incorporating the translucent style of Aero, the new taskbar is arguably even better than the Mac OS X dock. It features pinned programs using large, easy-to-see icons. Mouse over one and all windows associated with that program appear in preview. Mouse over one of those preview panes to reveal an X to close the window. Hover over the preview to show a full-size preview of the program, or click on the window to bring it to the front. Because of the button size, people with touchscreens should find it especially easy to use.

Jump lists are another new taskbar improvement that make recently opened documents easier to get to. Right-click or left-click and drag on any program icon pinned to the taskbar to see a list of files that you've recently used in that program. In Internet Explorer, this will show recently visited websites, although it doesn't yet seem to work in Firefox.

If you've noticed the missing Show Desktop icon, that's because it's been baked into the taskbar itself. Mouse over to the right corner. Hovering over the Show Desktop box reveals the desktop and then hides it when you mouse away. Click on the box to minimise all your programs.

Aero Peek shows the desktop when you hover over the right edge of the toolbar and is also an option in the program-switching hot key Alt+Tab. (This image was taken from the Windows 7 Release Candidate, but looks and functions the same in the official version of Windows 7.) (Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

Resizing programs has been simplified and improved by the capability to drag a window's title bar. Drag a program window to the top of your monitor to expand it to full screen. If you want to work in two windows simultaneously, drag one to the left edge and one to the right edge of your screen, and they'll automatically resize to half the width of your monitor. Dragging a program away from the top or sides will return it to its original size. This is an entirely new feature in Windows 7, but it should prove easy to adopt because it mimics and expands on the maximise/restore button that people have been resizing windows with since Windows 95.

Theme packages also make it much faster to change the look of Windows 7. From the Control Panel, you can change the theme under Appearance and Personalisation. Microsoft has created several theme packages to give people a taste for what the feature can do. Click on one to download it, and it instantly changes the colour scheme and background — no need to reboot. Users can create their own themes, as well.

Windows Media Player and Device Stage

One of the biggest new features makes Windows Media Player useful again: you can now stream media files from one Windows 7 computer to another, across the internet and out of network. Even better, the set-up procedure is dead simple.

When you open Windows Media Player, there's a new Stream option on the toolbar. Click it, and you're presented with two choices. Both require you to associate your computer with your free Windows Live ID. When you've associated a second Windows 7's WMP with that same ID, you can remotely access the media on the host computer. Windows Media Player's mini mode looks much slicker, emphasising the album art — sometimes at the expense of clearly seeing the controls, but it's a definite improvement.

Microsoft reinvigorates the Windows Media Player by allowing users to stream their media files to themselves. All it takes is two Windows 7 computers, an internet connection and a free Windows Live ID. (This image was taken from the Windows 7 Release Candidate, but looks and functions the same in the official version of Windows 7.) (Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

The new Device Stage makes managing peripherals significantly easier, combining printers, phones and portable media players into one window. A large photo of the peripheral summarises important device stats and makes it easy to identify which devices you're using. Device Stage can also be used to preset common tasks, such as synchronisation. Device Stage support for older devices makes one of Windows 7's best features applicable to peripherals and externals that don't need to be upgraded. One annoying change is that Bluetooth driver support no longer comes baked into the operating system. If you need a Bluetooth driver, you'll either need the installation disc on hand or you'll have to go download it.

Search, touchscreens and XP mode

Windows 7's native search feature has been improved. Files added to the hard drive were indexed so fast that they were searchable less than five seconds later. Search result snippets now include a longer snippet, and highlight the snippet more clearly. This should appeal specifically to people who juggle large numbers of long documents, but it's a useful feature for anybody who wants to find files faster. However, the search field is available by default only in the Start menu and in Windows Explorer, and cannot be easily added to the taskbar.

Search snippets do a better job of highlighting relevant terms in your documents, exposing useful data even if it's not in the file name. (This image was taken from the Windows 7 Release Candidate, but looks and functions the same in the official version of Windows 7.) (Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

Touchscreen features worked surprisingly well. The hardware sometimes misread some of the multi-touch gestures, occasionally confusing rotating an image, for example, with zooming in or out of the image. Overall, though, there were few difficulties in performing the basic series of gestures that Microsoft promotes, and this places Windows 7 in an excellent position for the future, as more and more computers are released with multi-touch abilities.

Experts and people or companies who hope to use Windows 7 for business situations will appreciate the new XP Mode. It doesn't have much of a practical application for the home consumer, but if you need to access programs designed for Windows XP that have not been upgraded to Windows Vista or 7, XP Mode creates a virtual environment within Windows 7 that should assuage any fears of upgrading without backwards compatibility.

Windows 7 supports a feature that won't be useful to most users, but businesses might do a double-take. XP Mode is a free add-on for Windows 7 that creates a virtual XP environment in which you can run older programs. (This image was taken from the Windows 7 Release Candidate, but looks and functions the same in the official version of Windows 7.) (Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

It's not easy to set up once you've downloaded the XP Mode installer. You'll need to double-check that you have the right hardware, and can get the right software. Hardware Virtualisation Technology, also known as AMD-V, Vanderpool or VT-d, must be supported for it to work. Motherboards older than two years probably won't work, and even if you do have a newer one you might have to go into your BIOS and activate Hardware Virtualisation. CPU-identification utilities are available from Microsoft that can tell you if you're in the clear or not. However, if compatibility is the issue, this hassle will be worth it to you. Users will have full access to peripherals connected to their Windows 7 hardware, including printers, and the clipboard can be used to cut and paste between the virtual operating system and the "real" one.

Security

User Account Control, or UAC, is back in Windows 7. Microsoft has tweaked the feature so that it's less intrusive, but it's not clear whether that means you're actually more or less secure than you were in Vista. UAC was one of the biggest changes in Vista. It tightened program access, but did it in such a way as to frustrate many owners of single-user computers. Windows 7 provides more options for user customisation of UAC.

The default setting is to notify users only when programs try to make changes to the computer, one step below the most restrictive setting of Always Notify. Under Always Notify, anytime a program tries to access the internet, or you try to make changes to the computer, Windows 7 will require user confirmation. The second-least restrictive option doesn't dim the desktop when UAC is activated, and will only notify the user when programs try to make changes to the computer. When the desktop dims, Windows 7 is locking it down and preventing access. Never Notify is the most relaxed option, and is only recommended by Microsoft for programs that aren't compatible with UAC.

UAC also displays a blue banner when confronted with a program from a known publisher versus a yellow banner and exclamation point when the program is from an unknown publisher. The number of clicks it should take to use UAC safely has been reduced, however, it's important to note that it's a less-aggressive default posture by UAC.

A less glitzy, but no less important, change to how removable drives are handled also can impact your media. Unlike Windows XP and Windows Vista, Windows 7 will no longer AutoRun external hard drives and USB keys when they're connected. This kills off a risky vector for malware infections that has been the bane of many security experts.

Although Microsoft is working on a revamp of its antivirus and anti-malware program, now called Microsoft Security Essentials, it won't be bundled with Windows 7. Users are still required to download a third-party antivirus and anti-malware program, although the Windows Firewall remains intact. As with many features in Windows 7 that have been carried over from Windows Vista, people will notice there's far more granular settings control than before. Features like filtering outbound traffic, which were available in Vista but not exposed, are easier to access in Windows 7.

Comparing Windows: XP vs. Vista vs. 7

Comparing Windows: XP vs. Vista vs. 7
Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7
Minimum hardware
  • Processor: 300MHz
  • RAM: 128MB
  • Super VGA graphics device
  • HD: 4.2GB (for SP3)
  • Processor: 1GHz
  • RAM: 1GB (32-bit), 2GB (64-bit)
  • Support for DirectX 9 graphics device with 128MB of memory
  • HD: 20GB (32-bit), 40GB (64-bit)
  • Processor: 1GHz
  • RAM: 1GB (32-bit), 2GB (64-bit)
  • Support for DirectX 9 graphics device with 128MB of memory
  • HD: 16GB (32-bit), 20GB (64-bit)
Interface
  • Luna theme
  • Introduces task-based windows options
  • Skinning possible but difficult
  • Desktop Cleanup Wizard automates removing old icons
  • Aero theme
  • Introduces transparent panes, window animations, live thumbnails of running programs
  • New desktop sidebar supports gadgets
  • Supports touchscreens
  • Aero theme
  • Supports slideshow backgrounds, RSS and theme packs
  • Introduces Aero Shake and Aero Snap
  • Desktop gadgets can be placed anywhere
  • Supports multi-touch on touchscreens
Explorer
  • Replaces tree navigation by default with task pane
  • Improves image handling
  • Offers thumbnail previews and group views
  • Supports some metadata
  • Task pane integrated into toolbar
  • New breadcrumb navigation
  • New metadata display
  • Improved icon resolution
  • Some documents can be edited from the preview pane
  • Support for federated searches and libraries
  • Virtual folders aggregate content from local and networked drives
Start menu
  • New layout
  • Devices and some Control Panel options appear in menu
  • Added search box
  • All Programs folder changed to a nested format
  • Configurable power button
  • User profile picture
  • Taskbar jumps appear in the Start menu and replace the right column when viewed
  • Documents, Pictures, Music buttons now link to their libraries
  • Control Panel options have been integrated into search results
Taskbar
  • New look
  • Icons can be hidden in the System Tray
  • Refreshed look
  • Alt-Tab hot key now shows preview thumbnail of program
  • Interactive mouse-over preview panes
  • Replacement of the Quick Launch bar with pinned programs
  • Program-specific jump lists based on pinned programs
  • Aero Peek for mouse-over desktop viewing
  • Revamped System Tray
Devices
  • Introduces Universal Plug-n-Play
  • New driver library allows for downgrading drivers when necessary
  • Debuts portable device API, designed to communicate with mobile phones, PDAs and portable media players
  • Introduces Sync Center for managing data synchronisations
  • New Device Stage provides a centralised, unified window for managing all aspects of printers and portable devices
Misc
  • Introduces context-menu CD and DVD burning from Windows Explorer
  • Supports multiple versions of a single DLL to prevent programs from overwriting each other
  • Introduces Hibernate and Sleep modes
  • Remote Desktop for accessing a computer from another location
  • Fast user account switching
  • Built-in drive partitioning
  • More powerful screen-capturing tool
  • Hybrid Sleep and better configuration options for more nuanced power management
  • User-based file-type associations
  • Previous Version automatically backs up changes to individual files
  • Expands Windows Explorer disc burning to include ISOs
  • Introduces XP Mode
  • Expanded options for disabling components
  • Can search text in scanned TIFF
  • Additional power-saving features for laptops

Performance

Windows 7 feels faster than Windows XP and Vista, but it turns out that's not always the case — sometimes, it's the slowest out of the three operating systems. CNET Labs tested four 32-bit Windows operating systems: Windows 7 RTM build 7600, Windows 7 Release Candidate build 7100, Windows Vista with Service Pack 2 and Windows XP SP3, all on an Insprion Desktop 530 Mini-tower running an Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4500 at 2.20GHz, with a 128MB Nvidia 8300 GS graphics card, 4GB of RAM, and two 320B SATA 7200rpm hard drives.

Microsoft Office performance (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Windows 7 RTM build 7600 (32-bit)
684 
Windows 7 RC build 7100(32-bit)
752 
Windows Vista SP2 (32-bit)
673 
Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
483 

iTunes encoding (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Windows 7 RTM build 7600 (32-bit)
187 
Windows 7 RC build 7100(32-bit)
188 
Windows Vista SP2 (32-bit)
189 
Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
187 

Boot time (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Windows 7 RTM build 7600 (32-bit)
41.25 
Windows 7 RC build 7100(32-bit)
44.81 
Windows Vista SP2 (32-bit)
40.16 
Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
40.03 

Shut down time (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Windows 7 RTM build 7600 (32-bit)
5.1 
Windows 7 RC build 7100(32-bit)
6.2 
Windows Vista SP2 (32-bit)
5.69 
Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
29.9 

Cinebench
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Windows 7 RTM build 7600 (32-bit)
4213 
Windows 7 RC build 7100(32-bit)
4184 
Windows Vista SP2 (32-bit)
4174 
Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
4217 

As you can see in the chart, we found that Windows 7 RTM was the fastest to shut down, and was tied with XP for iTunes encoding. However, it was slower than XP and Vista for both booting up cold by a bit more than one second, and slower than either of its predecessors in its Microsoft Office performance. After having used Windows 7 beta, RC, and now the RTM for more than six months combined, it still feels faster for us when launching programs, opening the control panel, and dragging icons, files and folders around than XP. That's not to denigrate the value of the benchmarks, but keep in mind that the perception and reality might differ based on hardware and usage.

Support

When you try to use a file already in use, Windows 7 goes beyond Vista and XP by telling you not just that it's being used, but where it's being used so you can manage the situation faster. Other than that, Windows 7 offers on-board operating system support nearly identical to Windows Vista. Screen darkening, one-click action hand-holding, and a useful question mark icon on all Explorer windows maintain Vista's improved help features, when compared with Windows XP.

Summary

Windows 7 looks like the operating system that both Microsoft and its consumers have been waiting for. By fixing most of the perceived and real problems in Vista, Microsoft has laid the groundwork for the future of where Windows will go. Windows 7 presents a stable platform that can compete comfortably with OS X, while reassuring the world that Microsoft can still turn out a strong, useful operating system.

Advertisement

Talkback 19 comments

    So many well thought out usabi ...Patanjali -- 13/07/09

    So many well thought out usability features.

    Hard drive running Vista 64 Ultimate died. Decided to run Win 7 on our main computers.

    Finding more to like about it every day.

    I run multiple monitors and a lot of the usability features, while very useful for single monitors, make window management on multiple monitors much easier. And the UAC can be set so it doesn't turn the room dark (dims all the monitors).

    The good: Shutdown in < 10 secs. Starup to all processes running in not much more but then we are using SSDs). Formats SSDs correctly (uses correct partition offsets). UAC can be set so that it doesn't blank all your monitors when it displays the dialog box. End to XPs "multiple configuration points" PITA - now the deep changes are a link on the simple changes' dialog boxes, instead of being on some other menu or whatever. Win-Left Arrow = Expand current program to left half of the current monitor. Win-Right Arrow = same to right side. Extend top of a window to make it expand to the full height of the workspace (of all monitors!) - great for those times looking at long lists or documents.

    The bad: Have to reinstall when the official version comes out. Hopefully, there will be so many already using it for real work that MS will allow the official version to install over it. Overall, I have not found any "that is really dumb" 'features'.

    Overall I am not impressed wit ...Joe Howski -- 15/07/09

    Overall I am not impressed with Windows 7. I carried out extensive beta testing and found many usability problems, as well a bugs particularly when working with files over networks.

    Those upgrading from Vista will fell it is a worthwhile update, simply to improve usability and speed.

    Those upgrading from XP will simply find that has improved security.

    The good: * Vista's service pack

    The bad: * Retail version very expensive when compared to Ubuntu or other Open source distro's * Crippleware when compared to Apples OS or Linux * Poor language support on lower versions, * Slow install * Slow boot when compared to Ubuntu * Long development cycle * Final product being build while Release candidate is being tested * No live boot * No partition editor * Still a heavy reliance on anti virus software. * No central software management. * Many features designed to lock users in to OS to later milk user for $ i.e. Live Mail * Pricing more expensive than Vista * Desktop is not intuitive to a new user that has never used a computer before. * No sandboxing facility for testing applications that may contain viruses. (I loved Sandboxie in XP 32bit) * NTFS file system still requires defrag's now considered out of date. * Licensed is a major problem, particularly with those having frequent hardware changes. * Interoperability between other OS is limited and mostly crippled unless you buy the Ultimate version * The Home edition (Bottom end) is totally crippled.

    yawn Anonymous -- 18/08/09 (in reply to #320204678)

    Clearly a Linux zealot trying to find fault where possible. DT Linux is still crap and just because it was developed by a load of geeks doesn't make it any good. you should do PR for the Linux community. NB. I don't work for Microsoft or any of its partners.

    Big yawwwwwwwwwn Mel Sommersberg -- 18/08/09 (in reply to #320204678)

    You found bugs in a Beta version - how bloody magnificent! Take a gold medal out of your next box of Weetbix, after all that is where you got the instructions on how to use a computer.

    I agree with the yawning Anonymous user - you are just a whinging Linux weenor with no clue on anything.

    Dunno where you get the idea about a slow install either. I installed the RC in 27 minutes on a 4 year old machine.

    wow, they've taken OSX and sla ...Daniel -- 16/07/09

    wow, they've taken OSX and slapped a Windows logo on it.

    Not a review. Just wanted to s ...Russell -- 18/07/09

    Not a review. Just wanted to say thanks to Patanjali for the honest review. Can't take the two below posters seriously, as they're obviously Linux/Apple fanboys.

    9/10? No way! Anonymous -- 18/08/09

    Seriously that review that Zdnet is so biased. There's no way I can rate an OS that's merely just a facelift from WinXP, that costs $449, nine over 10. No way!

    They must be getting free copies of Win 7 from MS.

    Apple Snow Leopard, which doesn't change must from Leopard in Visual appearance, but changes a lot in system performance is costing Mac users only $20 to upgrade.

    And if the benchmarks are to go by, it's actually slower in Office performance, and booting up and shutting down than its predecessors. That's completely unacceptable. Who the hell does MS takes up for? I just cannot afford to fork out $400+ for an OS that will make my system go slower, without adding anything significant.

    I can't see any more excuses for me not to upgrade to Mac OS X. Besides, I've heard so many good things like no viruses, faster booting and shutting down, better battery life management, more user friendly, and it supports Office 2008/10. I already own an iPhone, so it should work even better with the two.

    I'm seriously done with Windows, it's pathetic. Microsoft has always been like that anyway.

    Ummm derrr Mel Sommersberg -- 18/08/09 (in reply to #320226413)

    The idea with such a big upgrade to software is that you buy hardware that can power it correctly. If you prefer blowing your wages on cigarettes and pay TV then you can hardly blame your inability to budget for a new computer on Microsoft.

    Works like a dream on a Netbook Anonymous -- 18/08/09

    I installed a copy on a Dell Netbook (the one Vodafone sells with xp home) and am amazed with results.

    Runs for a dream. two thumbs up Microsoft.

    Nice Try Microsoft Anonymous -- 18/08/09

    I have used Windows 7 RTC and I am very impressed with the layout and how it works. I use Windows XP for most of my needs since linux is a bit too clumsy with hardware support. Havent tried a mac so cant really compare windows with a MAC.

    However, i find windows 7 installs within 40 minutes, and boots up in seconds ready to use from the word go.

    As to date I have not found any incompatibility issues with regards to drivers or games or any program i've installed.

    From a user ready to give up on Microsoft, I must say it is a break through from vista and though it may run slightly slower in overall performance there is still time for them to improve on this.

    I find windows 7 runs a lot smoother than XP when it comes to applications.

    Network side needs a bit of tweaking since downloads seems to be a slightly slower. This may be due to drivers/hardware or all.

    Vista users will definately love this as they will be use to the layout and will enjoy the crisp clean flow.

    Windows XP users may not like the layout as much since they will have to get use to where device settings are and the many other things they were use too. However once you learn how it's all organised, you will learn to love the responsiveness of the system.

    I did have a couple of times where I thought I was going to have to reset the computer due to a lock out, but if you give it a minute it actually does work its way out of it and runs again with no problems. Unlike XP where by if it froze you were probably forced to press that reset button and if it did work its way out, it was still slightly trying to catch up.

    Overall impression is 8/10 but will still need tweaking before final release.

    If you have vista i would definately recommend upgrading to it.

    If you have XP I would still recommend upgrading to it, although some games may say they don't support windows 7 they still play and havent found no problems.

    Linux is good for a server/basic office tasks but I wouldnt go saying linux is good as a common desktop operating system.

    Nice Try Microsoft Miles -- 19/08/09 (in reply to #320226552)

    I agree - Windows 7 is going to be recognized as a pretty darn good desktop OS. Linux has definately lost in this race. Mac OS is way better than Linux KDE and GNOME because of such chaos in the ranks of hackers that create the Linux industry. Yes - Linux makes a great server OS because it runs headless (without KDE or GNOME) and you can limit the amount of ports subject to attack and the modularity of the system makes it less prone to viral attacks and you don't need to use disk compression or defrag programs because Linux does it automaitically...and Mac is in the same boat but half in and half out when it comes to the server issues. But, for now -- Windows 7 is going to be my new OS and I'm loving Windows 2008 which I did beta testing on. I'm by no means a Windows centric lover -- I hate Balmer and his antics - but, facts are facts -- Windows 7 is better than Linux or Mac in my opinion.

    Boot times for win xp George -- 20/08/09

    The shutdown times noted for XP are way out. My 7 year old PC (athlon xp2000) consistently shuts down well within ten seconds, unless an app has hung requiring manual shutdown, otherwise XP performs very well in the benchmarks listed in the article.
    I have to agree with others that the price is simply unaffordable unless it comes installed with a new PC. I do look forward to trying it out when it becomes available.

    Startup time for XP Patanjali -- 21/08/09

    I wonder what they are measuring for startup times.

    To compare the OSs, the time has to:

    - start AFTER the BIOS has done its stuff. The boot loader on a multi-boot system is the obvious point

    - end when all services have finished, NOT when the background appears. On XP, the system is barely usuable when the background appears but only can really be used when all services have done their stuff (when the taskbar is fully completed loading. On Win 7, when the background appears all services have completed startup.

    I think using these times will show how dramatically Win 7 (and Vista to some extent) have improved startup.

    Ubuntu or Windows? Peter Cook -- 21/08/09

    Why not have both? It won't cost you any more money. Ubuntu 9.04 works well for me but I still use Windows to run software made for WIndows.
    I've loaded Win7 on a test PC. The best thing I have found is that by default clicking on the red power button actually turns the computer off, unlike Vista.
    Best thing about this article is I have learnt that Vista has a "Configurable power button" on the start menu. So I guess I can make the Vista power button turn the PC off too.

    Looks like Vista SP3 to me Anonymous -- 24/08/09

    For those out there on Vista SP2, I would suggest that it is not worth the expense of upgrading to Windows 7 unless Microsoft offers an attractive upgrade deal.

    Upgrade from Vista Anonymous -- 24/08/09 (in reply to #320242145)

    What is the story with upgrading to Windows 7 from Vista? Seems to me it should be a free upgrade considering that Vista was such a disaster. In fact they should give us a free upgrade and reimburse any therapists' bills incurred during the time Vista was in use...

    upgrade Anonymous -- 26/08/09 (in reply to #320242170)

    thank you! i could not agree more. if vista was any other commercial product the replacement would be just that - a free replacement for a faulty product. just about threw my otherwise brilliant pc laptop through the window an hour ago (thanks microsoft). i should not have to pay more money to replace something that has never worked properly.

    this is why i love my macbook and my imac. the toshiba lappie is a great computer ruined by a microsoft OS that i have to run for research programs that wont work on any other OS.

    does it grind to a halt after 3 months Anonymous -- 24/08/09

    every windows machine I have ever had just grinds to a halt after 3-6 months despite maintenance and I have to do a clean install to get my performance back. I have not experienced this with the one Macbook (OSX) and the Ubuntu install I have.

    Has anyone reviewed that aspect of Win7? This is a much bigger end user problem than most of the points mentioned in the article

    Compatibility Chris Megson -- 08/09/09

    I have Windows 7 running on my computer, as an MS Partner as a programmer. With Vista, I installed it and then formatted my computer within 10 minutes. Windows 7 will accept your Windows XP Driver (inf) files to install your drivers, which is very good. As for program compatability, there is a little left to be desired for the businesses out there with "legacy" applications. For example, getting Adminpak to work for AD admin is painful. However that said, Windows 7 does actually tell you if it expects there to be some compatability issues, and if a rogram is not compatabile, it actually does not allow you to install it.
    Irriatating things, Windows Live Messenger, does not minimise to the taskbar, you have to change the application file to be Vista or XP Compatible in order for it to do that.

    The taskbar has been vastly improved both in space management and visual appearance, where a thumbnail exists for each app that is open, whether 1 or more instances.

    All in all, comparted to vista, 1000% better. Compared to XP, I think that is a much closer race, not to take anything away from Windows 7, but XP is possibly the best OS that Microsoft have built since DOS 6.22.
    I think until the corporate world catches up, on the server side aswell, which requires alot of businesses to fork out thousands of dollars, XP will still hang on in the corporate side, and therefore with Administrators, as alot of the tools required to service these servers are not compatible with Windows 7.

    For the home user, if you hated the look and feel of Vista, you will not be a big fan of Windows 7, but it may grow on you. The UAC or User Access Control feature has been relaxed a fair bit, but is still overly annoying compared to where it should be, in my opinion anyway.

Add your opinion

Overview

» See more images

The good:
  • Strong design and Microsoft don't always go together, but they do in Windows 7
  • Users might take a while to get used to the new taskbar and Aero Peek, but they're a pleasure to use
The bad:
  • Performance is still hit-or-miss
  • At the ripe age of seven, Windows XP still performs better in some categories
The bottomline:

Windows 7 is more than what Vista should have been &mdash; it's where Microsoft needed to go. How much damage Vista did and whether Windows 7 is enough for people to finally abandon Windows XP are questions that nobody has the answers to right now.

Editors’ rating:

9/10

RRP: AU$449.00

Related topics:

microsoft, operating system, professional, windows 7

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • Array Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured