|
Contents |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
We evaluated each tool on a P4 2.6GHz machine with 512MB of RAM running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. We had 30 PCs connected to our network across four switches and single router to the outside world. We tested each tool in these areas:
Interoperability: We looked at the network topologies it supports (for example Ethernet 10/100/1000 & Wireless a, b and g networks.
Futureproofing: What upgrade features are available?
ROI: What do you get for your money?
Service: What service and support is available.
Sample scenario
This company wants to measure the performance and application responsiveness of its Exchange and Apache Web Servers from a user's point of view.
Approximate budget: Open, as long as the product pays for itself.
Requires: Network management software.
Concerns: Ease of management, the ability to measure response times and produce detailed reports.
Winner: AppManager
AppManager is the most suitable product here. It can be used to measure SLAs and would be ideal for a company needing to measure the performance of critical applications. It can also monitor a large number of applications running on Windows, Unix, and Linux-based systems.
Having said that, if you are looking for a product to only manage bandwidth, out of the products listed here you would be best off going with Lightspeed Systems -- it focuses on identifying users that use file sharing applications and also allows you to shape your bandwidth by giving priority bandwidth to specific applications.
When making a decision on which network and systems management tool is the most appropriate ask yourself whether you need a tool that just monitors your network, helps you troubleshoot network problems, or keeps an eye on system SLAs.
This article was first published in Technology & Business magazine.
Click here for subscription information.





