Mozilla 1.0: The final word

By
07 June 2002 12:10 PM
Tags: mozilla 1.0: the final word
Mozilla 1.0

It's probably safe to say that more people are waiting for the long-delayed fifth Harry Potter book than for the final release of Mozilla 1.0. But while Hogwarts fans will have to wait a while longer, patient Mozilla fans have finally gotten their due.

The four-and-a-half-year wait is over--Mozilla 1.0 has gone gold, and from what we've seen, it's been worth the delay. Because Mozilla aimed this browser primarily at Web developers and seasoned Web surfers, it's a little too complicated for the average consumer. Nonetheless, speedy version 1.0 is hard to crash and includes an impressive e-mail program. If you'd like a solid alternative to the Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 hegemony, give Mozilla try while you wait for Netscape 7; you might like what you find.

Speedy and stable
Any browser that intends to compete in today's browser wars must load Web pages quickly. That's why Netscape launched the Mozilla project more than four years ago: to wipe away the slow, buggy Netscape 4.x code and replace it with a modern browser engine. ZDNet Labs ran Mozilla through four speed tests to see how it measures up to Netscape and IE. Mozilla topped Netscape 6.x in our mixed text and graphics tests but ran a fraction slower than Netscape in the other three. And that's a bit odd, considering that Netscape 6.x is based on a much earlier version of the Mozilla software. Even stranger, both Mozilla and Netscape outran IE 6 in three of four tests. However, since the browser's actual speeds often varied by less than a second, it was a very close race.

Mozilla 1.0 is up to par in the stability camp, too. Whereas Netscape 6 would grind to a halt at times when simply attempting to launch Composer, the built-in HTML editor, Mozilla 1.0 has no problems running that program, even on an underpowered laptop (a 233MHz Pentium MMX with 96MB of RAM running Windows 98 SE). Nor did Mozilla 1.0 crash during our tests, even when running complicated Web pages that use both Java and Flash.

Running up a tab
As always, we're big fans of Mozilla's tabbed browser interface, which looks similar to Opera's setup. Tabs let you quickly cruise through multiple Web pages in one browser window, rather than forcing you to open different pages in different windows. The little row of tabs, like those of a manila folder, appears just above the Web page. To turn on the tabs, go to the Edit > Preferences menu, click the Navigator heading to open the subheads, and select Tabbed Browsing. In the dialog box, there are a few options for opening new tabs. Our favorite, the Control+Enter option, lets you type a URL into the address field the way you normally would, then hit Control+Enter to open the URL into a new tab.

Pop-up haters, unite!
If you're like us, you're not a big fan of pop-up and pop-under ads. Hence, you'll adore the handy Mozilla feature that disables many, though not all, of them. Sorry to say, you'll need to decipher some technobabble to activate this feature. From the menu bar, select Edit > Preferences, then double-click the Advanced option to see all of the suboptions. Click Scripts & Windows, and you'll see a list labeled Allow Webpages To. The first check box on the list is Open Unrequested Windows. Uncheck this, and--voilà!--most pop-ups will go away. A word of warning, though; this function doesn't discriminate, so it may disable pop-ups you actually want to see, such as the video pop-ups on the News.com front door.

Skin tight
If you're worried that this techie browser will look bare and unattractive, don't be. Although Mozilla's default skin makes the browser seem pretty old-school, much like Netscape Navigator 4.x's, you can easily download custom skins from sites such as XulPlanet. There's even a skin on XulPlanet that makes Mozilla look very much like IE, if that's your cup of tea. This feature doesn't make your life easier, but it allows you to cater to your aesthetic tastes.

Good but no IE killer
Beyond its skins and pop-up-killing abilities, however, Mozilla 1.0 doesn't do much more for the average Web surfer than Internet Explorer does. For one thing, Mozilla doesn't always render Web pages the same way IE does. Why does that matter? Many Web designers have built sites primarily for IE, and those pages look odd in Mozilla. For example, we struggled with sites that use a technology called positioning to put ads on their pages. In IE, those ads temporarily hide part of the page, then go away. But in our Mozilla tests, the ads sometimes permanently blocked part of the page, and we had to reload the page until we got a different, regular, nonpositioning ad.

Despite these few foibles, Mozilla compares favorably to both Netscape and Internet Explorer. But don't make any decisions yet. Read on to see what we think of Mozilla's chat and e-mail clients.

Chatzilla
Integrated chat clients are nothing new. IE comes with its own proprietary instant messenger (IM), and Netscape ships with a full version of AIM. While most of the popular IMs connect to their own proprietary chat systems--ICQ uses the ICQ protocol, for example--Mozilla's chat client, Chatzilla, connects to the IRC (Internet Relay Chat) network. Unfortunately, IRC client apps aren't very user friendly, and the same goes for Chatzilla. You won't find any pop-up icons or happy little noises telling you somebody wants to chat. In fact, you'll have to know how to type in the various cryptic IRC commands to get to chat rooms and find someone to talk to.

Chatzilla doesn't offer much help, either. We looked everywhere in Mozilla's help browser (Help > Help Contents) and couldn't find a single blessed thing on Chatzilla or IRC. You must dig and poke around on your own to figure it out. If you really want to chat on IRC, use an IM such as Trillian instead.

A better e-mail client
On the bright side, Mozilla's e-mail client, Mail, is far more complete than its chat client. It supports multiple IMAP and POP3 accounts (the two leading e-mail technologies), so you can set up in-boxes for all of your e-mail accounts from within Mozilla's client. Mail also offers a couple of handy new features that make it easier to organize, sort, and categorize your e-mail overflow.

We also like Mail's new search feature: You select a folder containing e-mail messages, and the right-hand window then displays a toolbar with a search box. Type in the word or phrase you want to find and hit Enter. Mozilla quickly filters the list of messages to only those that have your search term(s) in the Subject or Sender fields. If you need to do a more complex search, say, inside the body of your e-mail messages, click the Advanced tab next to the search box. There, you'll be able to build more complex search queries. Unfortunately, there's still no way to search all of your accounts simultaneously. (Microsoft Outlook lets you search all accounts, but it takes forever.) Overall, Mail is quite an improvement over its Netscape 6.x predecessor.

Mozilla 1.0 also makes it easier to color-code your e-mail by using labels. Default labels include green for Personal and red for Important, but you can easily change the meaning associated with each color. (Go to Edit > Preferences, open up the Mail & Newsgroups heading to see the subheadings, and select the one called Label.) And here's the really nifty part: by combining labels with Mozilla's e-mail filters (Message > "Create filter from message"), you can color-code messages based on filters that you create yourself. For example, Mozilla can automatically label e-mail from your boss as Important so that any message from that person shows up in your in-box with a bright red subject line. You can also let Mozilla sort your in-box by its label, which is handy if, for example, you need to hunt down a hot date tip in your Personal e-mail.

Some buggy extras
Keep in mind, however, that Mozilla has aimed its browser primarily at Web developers. Thus, version 1.0 includes a number of extras just for them. In the Tools > Web Development menu, you'll find a JavaScript debugger and a feature for verifying your Web page's HTML structure. Some of these tools behave in unexpected ways. For example, when we ran File > Quit from the JavaScript debugger, instead of closing just the debugger window, it closed all of our Mozilla browser windows, as well--definitely not the behavior we expected or wanted.

Warts and all
Still, on balance, we're pleased with Mozilla's extras. Chatzilla doesn't impress us, and we found a few bugs in Mozilla's developer tools. But Mozilla's e-mail client is first-rate, and the browser itself is speedy and stable. Stay tuned for future reviews to find out whether Netscape 7 will take the lead or if Internet Explorer can regain some of its lost speed. But in the meantime, it won't hurt to check out Mozilla 1.0.

ZDNet Labs tests Mozilla 1.0
To test browser performance, we timed how long each browser took to load certain page types. One set of pages included mixed text and images; another set had nested tables. We also tested to see how fast each browser would load these pages when they were cached. To do this, we loaded each test page, then a second Web page. We then clicked the Back button and timed how long it took for the cached page to load.

We ran all of our tests on an internal Ethernet network so that network traffic would not affect performance. Our test machine was a 1.0GHz Pentium III Notebook with 256MB of RAM running Windows XP Pro.

To test Java performance, we ran Pendragon's CaffeineMark 3.0, which is a series of nine tests that evaluate Java Virtual Machine performance. We ran our tests on a 1.0GHz Pentium III Notebook with 256MB of RAM running Windows XP Pro. CaffeineMark returns an overall score, or a CaffeineMark .

Mozilla 1.0 Windows XP Pro tests
Longer bars indicate better performance, with the fastest browser scoring 100.

Note: Although the gaps among the browser load times seem alarming, the actual time differences vary by a second or less.

Mozilla 1.0
Company: Mozilla Organization
Price: Free Download


Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Reviews by category

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured