IM invasion: 4 chat apps compared

By Robert Vamosi, CNET.com
03 September 2004 05:31 PM
Tags: instant, aim, icq, messenger, msn, yahoo, chat, aol
IM invasion: top chat apps compared Like e-mail, instant messaging has become a part of our lives, at work, at home, at school, on the go -- even on our mobile phones. We take a look at four top chat apps, all of them free, and weigh the relative merits of each.

Multitasking: these days, it's a necessary part of any job and of daily life. So the ability to have a phone conversation while sending several instant messages simultaneously can sometimes make or break a business deal -- or your date for Friday night. Instant messaging is fast, convenient, and -- dare we say -- entertaining, whether you use it at work, at home, at school, on the go, or even on your mobile phone.

We looked at four leading instant messenger (IM) apps: AOL AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger, and Yahoo Messenger, our Editors' Choice. All are free, although AOL and MSN offer additional features for a price. All are primarily geared toward casual Internet use (AOL AIM offers several business-related features as add-ons) but work acceptably in an office environment as well. In our reviews, we examined these apps' strengths and weaknesses with regard to setup and interface, feature set, and customer service.

Unfortunately, none of these chat apps allows you to talk to friends registered with other services. In other words, your AIM account can't talk to you best friend's Yahoo account -- that is, unless you use another piece of software, such as Trillian. Trillian breaks the chat app monopolies by supporting all four major IMs: AIM, ICQ, MSN, and Yahoo, aggregating your accounts on each into one interface.

If you're concerned about security risks with instant messaging, specifically about buffer-overflow attacks (a common means of penetrating PC defenses) and spim (IM spam), you could try IMsecure, a security product from the people who make the ZoneAlarm firewall. It's the only product of its kind, and it works with AIM, ICQ, MSN, and Yahoo chat apps.

Use our handy chart to compare the features and setup requirements of the Big Four chat apps.

AOL AIM 5.5 Yahoo Messenger 6.0 MSN Messenger 6.2 ICQ 4.1
Editors' rating 7.6 8.0 7.3 8.0
Registration information Asks somewhat intrusive questions Asks less-intrusive questions Asks extremely intrusive questions Asks personal information that is optional
What you can customise Backgrounds Backgrounds, skins Backgrounds Skins, backgrounds, keyboard shortcuts
Business features Lightbridge Web-based conference calling ($); WebEx Web-based video- conferencing ($) Video and voice Video, voice, and whiteboard ($) Voice and video
Works with mobile phone Yes, 2-way Yes, 2-way Yes, 2-way Yes, 2-way
Technical support E-mail (24-hour response), FAQ FAQs only Forum, e-mail, FAQ E-mail (24-hour response), FAQ

Note: $ denotes services that require additional fees.

AOL AIM 5.5 AOL AI M 5.5 
Despite several business-oriented add-ons, AIM 5.5 is a free and versatile instant messenger that's best suited for AOL home users. That said, we like Yahoo and ICQ even better.
Full review
ICQ 4.1 ICQ 4.1 
The free, legendary chat client just keeps getting better; ICQ is the best pick, along with Yahoo Messenger, for features and versatility.
Full review
MSN Messenger 6.2 MSN Messenger 6.2 
Relentless offers for premium (fee-based) services turn MSN Messenger into a big advertisement rather than a useful communication tool. For the most free features, use Yahoo or ICQ instead.
Full review
Yahoo Messenger 6.0 Yahoo Messenger 6.0 
The most versatile and best free IM client we reviewed, if you can do without e-mail tech support.
Full review
Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    It's a pity Jabber (www.jabber ...Anonymous -- 06/09/04

    It's a pity Jabber (www.jabber.org) didn't get a mention. It has several benefits like Trillian (combining protocols etc), with most of the security features of IMSecure (like SSL, encrypting messages between users etc). I've implemented many Jabber servers for companies wanting to take control of their in-house and external instant messaging - in essence creating an IM gateway for their corporate users; rather than arbitrarily blocking IM, embracing and controlling it.

    Yes, why no mention of Jabber? ...Anonymous -- 22/09/04

    Yes, why no mention of Jabber?

    I was looking for more info on Jabber which would have been interesting in a comparative review, but all I found is another reader with whom to share my disappointment...

    For anyone looking for informa ...Anonymous -- 14/01/05

    For anyone looking for information on Jabber or a server to use in Australia, take a look at:
    http://www.jabber.org.au/

    We provide a public server, chatrooms and web discussion forums for help with using Jabber.

    I am looking at another compan ...Anonymous -- 28/04/05

    I am looking at another company in the UK called Marmot Technologies. They seem to be the first ones there who have developed a mobile to mobile chatting application and platform like the big boys. Not too shabby.

    Moid Tungekar Anonymous -- 11/05/06 (in reply to #120116265)

    I don't know if you are the right Moid Tungekar. It's James from WPI. What is your email? Send me an email to jamesrgibson@gmail.com if it's you.

    DVD shop: arthouse-films Anonymous -- 28/02/06

    Hi! How at you with weather? At us absolutely of gloom = (

Add your opinion

Back to top

Featured