|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
Fast AlltheWeb: Google killer? August 12, 2002 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/software/internet/soa/Fast-AlltheWeb-Google-killer-/0,139023437,120267292,00.htm
Could a Norwegian owned Web search utility unseat Google's stranglehold on the Web searching market? Norwegian-owned Fast Search & Transfer (Fast) shot the moon when it named its search engine AlltheWeb. But judging by the numbers, this six-year-old tool lives up to its moniker. In June, AlltheWeb surpassed Google, the Lance Armstrong of search engines, in the race to index the Web. At the time of this writing, Fast had indexed 2,112,188,990 documents and counting--about 2,000,000 documents more than its rival. While AlltheWeb hasn't caught on yet--most Netizens still rate Google No. 1--this search engine dark horse is efficient and easy to use, and it deserves a look. So fresh and so clean But the similarities end there. An easy-to-use tabbed interface lets you quickly expand your search to include specific file types, such as video or MP3s, or document types (news stories, for example). Enter a keyword or a search phrase, and in addition to the standard laundry list of results, AlltheWeb tracks down related topics and displays them to the right in an area labeled Fast Topics. While the Fast Topics results occasionally shed light on your subject, especially when you know next to nothing about a search term, they proved erratic at best in our tests. For example, a search for Rudolph Valentino, a silent-film actor, generated useful links to search results of posters and collectibles, but when we typed in Heimlich maneuver, AlltheWeb included a link to old news stories about Dick Vitale, an ESPN sportscaster who choked on a piece of melon in July 2000. Related, yes; useful, no. On a par with Google most of the time Just like Google, Fast uses advanced algorithms to rank pages based on relevancy, and in our tests, AlltheWeb worked just as well as Google. A search for skin cancer, for example, yielded 642,116 results, compared to a mere 401,100 from Google. AlltheWeb's top 10 results were nearly identical to Google's, except that the first result took us to a shoddy page on alternative skin cancer treatment. Unfortunately, AlltheWeb's multimedia search results generally either missed the mark or served up outdated results. When we searched for Rio de Janeiro using the image search, AlltheWeb brought up 119 pics, and the first 9 were dead links. The same search on Google knocked our socks off; it generated 336 results, and most of the images were absolutely stunning. Tweak, and ye shall find Fast AlltheWeb
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |