NAS for the rest of us: 4 storage solutions


Contents
Introduction
Reliability and redundancy
EMC NetWin 110 and Clariion AX100
Snap Server 4500
Sun StorEdge 5210 NAS
Xserve G5 Server and Xserve RAID Array
Specifications
How we tested
Editor's choice

How we tested

The test environment was a small network was setup in the lab comprising the following:
  • NAS under test
  • 3com SuperStack3 10/100/1000 Switch
  • Client - Dell PowerEdge 6600 Quad Xeon server with 3GB of memory, gigabit LAN connectivity, SCSI RAID 5 array and Windows Server 2003.

Windows File Copy Tests
A series of files were copied to and from each NAS from our Windows Server 2003 client to look at common file transfer speeds using a variety of file sizes as shown below:
  • Test 1: A single ZIP file of 1,967,101,917 bytes (copied to NAS)
  • Test 2: A collection of 3401 files in 342 folders totalling 2,246,716,585 bytes (copied to and read from NAS)
  • Test 3: A collection of 13,222 files in 1237 folders totalling 5,995,670,198 bytes (Copied to NAS)
In addition the collection of files in Test 2 were also copied from one folder in the NAS under test to another folder in the same NAS.

Sample scenario

This company needs additional storage to cope with the rapid expansion of its e-mail and other storage needs.

Approximate budget: AU$40,000.

Requires: 1TB of total storage, either in one or two units, with gigabit Ethernet network connectivity and fibre channel for future SAN connectivity.

Concerns: In addition to the performance of the storage unit(s), the ability to manage the unit(s) easily and to integrate with current systems such as directory servers will be very highly regarded.

For maximum uptime, redundancy of disks, power supplies, and network connections will also be a consideration.

Best solution: SnapServer 4500

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Back to top

Featured