Flat-panel festival


Contents
Introduction
Acer AL1922
AG Neovo E-19A
BenQ FP91G
HP 1955
LG L1980Q
Mitsubishi DV197SB
NEC 1970NX
NewQ LVNR190
Philips 190B6
Sony SDM-HS95B
ViewSonic VX924
Specifications
How we tested
Editor's choice
About RMIT

How we tested
We used Display Mate for Windows video edition to adjust each model according to instructions and patterns stipulated by the application. We looked at subjective image samples, movie clips and patterns to get a feel for the image quality and clarity. We also ran 3DMark to see how they looked in a fast paced graphically intensive environment.

Our test rig remained the same for all units -- an Acer Veriton 7800 with an Intel 830 (3.0Ghz) CPU, 160GB SATA HDD unit, 2GB RAM, and a NVIDIA 6800 video card with dual DVI outputs. In all the tests we used the DVI input on the monitors.

We also looked at the monitors for viewable screen size, base design, and level of adjustment (up/down, forward/backwards tilt, and left/right swivel) as well as whether or not they supported landscape/portrait rotation.

Ports are considered and internal speakers, USB, Kensington security lock ports, along with VESA mounting points are noted. Whether or not external "brick" type AC adaptors are used or whether IEC power sockets are available to power the monitors directly was also looked at.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Benq FP91G Marc Jones -- 19/01/06 (in reply to #120127529)

    Great monitor, clear graphics display.

    Im running 2 computers in my room one running DVI and the other D-SUB, and i love the feature to be able to switch between the 2 displays!

    Life is not good with LG R Moore -- 05/04/06

    My experience with LG monitors is not a positive one. The 19" monitor I bought lasted 2 weeks and turned up its toes and it has been with the service agent for 3 weeks with no end in sight. LGE Australia have been of no assistance whatsoever with getting me a solution. Most of the time they will not respond to queries posted on their website and do not seem to care about any inconvenience I might have to suffer. I would not recommend their products to anyone. They may be OK if they do not break down but if they do, you are most certainly on your own.

    HP 1955 Anonymous -- 14/12/06

    Horrible monitor. Corporate setting. All cubicles have these monitors. At least 10 burned out this year.

    Don't Buy them.

    Hp 1955 Eric -- 17/03/08

    yeah, same with mine at home, just burned out one evening, useless product.

    HP 1955 Anonymous -- 28/03/08

    I bought my HP 1955 with the xw4300 workstation back in 2005 and it hasn't given me a bit of trouble. Truly reliable, no dead pixels, works flawlessly.

    Contrast that with -- In '07 I bought a Polaroid FLM-1911 Monitor/TV so I could watch football (American style!) while working but also use the monitor as an extension for presentation in my office. It's already dead. TV (via cable) stopped working, DVD output only works on HDTV now, and VGA flickers with a pinkish hue.

    I'll take HP quality over Polaroid any day.

Add your opinion

Back to top

Featured