Flat-panel festival


Contents
Introduction
Acer AL1922
AG Neovo E-19A
BenQ FP91G
HP 1955
LG L1980Q
Mitsubishi DV197SB
NEC 1970NX
NewQ LVNR190
Philips 190B6
Sony SDM-HS95B
ViewSonic VX924
Specifications
How we tested
Editor's choice
About RMIT

Viewsonic VX924
This has a black bezel and rear framed with silver, while the base is a silver hollow rectangle. The rear of the unit has a Kensington key lock, VESA mounting points, an IEC power socket, DVI, and D-SUB inputs.

The base, which is removable, is very sturdy. The only problem is it offers little in the way of movement/adjustment -- only slight forward and backward tilting. The back of the base is removable which allows neat routing of the cables.

Once the monitor is powered up, the menu system is easy to navigate. We could achieve very good graduation between blacks, greys, and whites.

Colour graduation was also very good with only the brighter blues tending to bleed into themselves. Both text and graphics showed up with very sharp images and the yellow colour reproduced very nicely. Video playback is very smooth, and the contrast is excellent.

3DMark showed the real performance of this monitor with very little tearing apparent. Viewsonic claim four milliseconds (ms) response time with this monitor -- if this is the case then it is very difficult to detect the differences between 8ms and 4ms, most likely depending on the media, PC, and video card more than the monitor itself.

At AU$899 it seems Viewsonic are cashing in on its 4ms response claim. Granted the video reproduction is very good, however, so too were the BenQ, HP, and Philips and each of those came in either considerably cheaper or with more features.

Product VX924
RRP AU$899
Vendor ViewSonic
Phone 02 9906 6277
Web www.viewsonic.com.au
 
Warranty 36 months limited warranty on LCD, parts and labour.
Dead/bright pixel policy 3 months zero bright dot warranty
Interoperability
Limited features and ergonomics.
Futureproofing ½
DVI and Analogue ports, 4ms response time.
ROI
Quite costly considering the only claim to fame is the 4ms response time. Would have preferred to see better ergonomics and even perhaps landscape/portrait swivel at this price.
Service ½
36 months is very good and appears to be standard with most of the panels in this review.
Rating ½

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Benq FP91G Marc Jones -- 19/01/06 (in reply to #120127529)

    Great monitor, clear graphics display.

    Im running 2 computers in my room one running DVI and the other D-SUB, and i love the feature to be able to switch between the 2 displays!

    Life is not good with LG R Moore -- 05/04/06

    My experience with LG monitors is not a positive one. The 19" monitor I bought lasted 2 weeks and turned up its toes and it has been with the service agent for 3 weeks with no end in sight. LGE Australia have been of no assistance whatsoever with getting me a solution. Most of the time they will not respond to queries posted on their website and do not seem to care about any inconvenience I might have to suffer. I would not recommend their products to anyone. They may be OK if they do not break down but if they do, you are most certainly on your own.

    HP 1955 Anonymous -- 14/12/06

    Horrible monitor. Corporate setting. All cubicles have these monitors. At least 10 burned out this year.

    Don't Buy them.

    Hp 1955 Eric -- 17/03/08

    yeah, same with mine at home, just burned out one evening, useless product.

    HP 1955 Anonymous -- 28/03/08

    I bought my HP 1955 with the xw4300 workstation back in 2005 and it hasn't given me a bit of trouble. Truly reliable, no dead pixels, works flawlessly.

    Contrast that with -- In '07 I bought a Polaroid FLM-1911 Monitor/TV so I could watch football (American style!) while working but also use the monitor as an extension for presentation in my office. It's already dead. TV (via cable) stopped working, DVD output only works on HDTV now, and VGA flickers with a pinkish hue.

    I'll take HP quality over Polaroid any day.

Add your opinion

Back to top

Featured