|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
Apple Time Capsule (1TB) Network Storage By Rich Brown, CNET.com March 12, 2008 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/hardware/networking/soa/Apple-Time-Capsule-1TB-Network-Storage/0,2000065582,339286717,00.htm
Apple's new Time Capsule incorporates both a wireless router and a hard drive into the same product. In its niche, the Time Capsule is the most advanced product on the market -- its price is also fair compared with a separate router and network-attached hard drive. It is available in either a 500GB (for AU$429) or 1TB (for AU$699) model. Mac owners and the space or design conscious should consider the Time Capsule if they're in need of a router upgrade, but Windows PC owners should look elsewhere for more advanced storage capabilities, as should anyone that demands fast wireless performance. Setup and ease of use The design of the Time Capsule is clean and visually appealing, and almost identical to the Airport Extreme Base Station. You still get one indicator light up front and a row of ports on the back. That's it. Many routers offer an array of blinking status LEDs, but the Time Capsule gives you only a static green light to let you know that it's working. The backside provides you with a single gigabit Ethernet port for a connection to your broadband internet or LAN, three Gigabit ports for hard-wired network devices and a single USB 2.0 input. There's no power button, but you do get a reset button to restore the factory default settings. The power cable plugs directly into the back. We should note that while the Time Capsule is basically silent, the top gets hot, especially when the hard drive is moving a lot of data. Be sure to store it in a well-ventilated area. Apple made the claim that setting up the Time Capsule to manage your network is easy, and if you're comfortable with basic networking concepts, it is. If you don't know whether you have a static IP address or you're unfamiliar with abbreviations like PPP and DHCP, you can still probably navigate Time Capsule's handful of setup screens, thanks to mostly clear English descriptions that accompany each option. You initiate the installation by inserting the Time Capsule CD, and from there (on a Mac) it will update your AirPort Utility, and then prompt you to select various options. Windows drivers are also included on the disc. With your network established, Windows users should be able to see the hard drive in their network folder, and read and write files to it as with any networked storage device. You can set up a password to connect to the drive, although you get no user management interface like that of the HP MediaSmart Server. You can also access the Time Capsule's drive remotely through a .Mac account, which you have to pay for. The HP Server provides you remote access for free, although it's not a router. Mac users can use the Time Capsule's hard drive for basic storage as well, but they also get more benefit from Time Capsule than the Windows crowd, due to its interface with Leopard's Time Machine feature. Time Machine lets you set automated backups from the Macs on your network directly to the Time Capsule. It took about two hours to back up a relatively sparse 21GB of data on a Macbook laptop over a wired gigabit connection to the Time Capsule. Apple has also preset Time Capsule to perform several backups a day for the first week you set it up, several backups a week after the first day, and then throughout each month, until you run out of drive space. Each backup only saves the information that's changed, so you don't have to do the complete multi-gigabyte data transfer every time. You can also tell Time Machine to back up manually whenever you want. Performance Storage write test (via Gigabit Ethernet, in MBps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Iomega N150d StorCenter Pro NAS Server 1TB
6
Buffalo HS-DH250GL LinkStation Live NAS 250GB
5.2
Netgear ReadyNAS NV+
4.6
Apple Time Capsule
4.6
Lacie Ethernet Disk Mini-NAS 500GB
4.58
Western Digital MyBook World Edition NAS 500GB
2.7
Storage read test (via Gigabit Ethernet, in MBps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Netgear ReadyNAS NV+
6.06
5.47
Apple Time Capsule
5.11
Lacie Ethernet Disk Mini-NAS 500GB
4.17
Buffalo HS-DH250GL LinkStation Live NAS 250GB
3.14
Western Digital MyBook World Edition NAS 500GB
2.78
As for its performance, we're happy enough with the Time Capsule's capability as a storage device. Results will vary depending on what kind of connection you use (see the wireless performance below, for example) but when you connect a system to the Time Capsule via a Gigabit Ethernet cable, you should feel comfortable knowing that its data transfer speeds lie within the range of what we expect from other network attached hard drives. Turn over the page to see how the Apple Time Capsule performs as a router, and our views on service and support.
Ixia IxChariot maximum throughput tests with mixed 802.11b/g and draft N clients (at 15 feet, in Mbps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Edimax BR-6504N nMax
68
Netgear RangeMax Next WNR854T
67.5
Asus WL-500W 802.11n
55.1
SMC SMCWGBR14-N Barricade N
52.4
Apple Time Capsule
51.51
D-Link DGL-4500 Xtreme Gaming Router
50.9
LevelOne N-One WBR-6000
23.9
Ixia IxChariot long-range tests (Throughput measured indoors at 200 feet, in Mbps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Asus WL-500W 802.11n
29.7
D-Link DGL-4500 Xtreme Gaming Router
27
Netgear RangeMax Next WNR854T
26.9
SMC SMCWGBR14-N Barricade N
24.3
Apple Time Capsule
21.36
Edimax BR-6504N nMax
11.4
LevelOne N-One WBR-6000
5.3
Although we're satisfied with its storage performance, as a wide-bandwidth 802.11n wireless router, the Time Capsule is decidedly mediocre. On the 2.4GHz performance indicated in our charts, the Time Capsule fell behind by a full 20 Mbps on our max throughput test compared with a NetGear RangeMax router. It's also on the lower end of the spectrum when compared on our long range and mixed throughput tests. We don't show 5.0GHz frequency scores for brevity, but our results on those tests scaled in a similar fashion. Anecdotally, backing up and moving data back and forth between the drive and various systems felt reasonably fast, but if you need your network to be especially speedy, our charts show that you have several faster options out there.
Service and support
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |