The best mobile processor is...

The best mobile processor is...

Best overall performance
This score is an amalgamation of tests including, PCMark05 (build 1.2.0), 3DMark06 (build 1.1.0), Pinnacle Studio Plus Version 11 for video file conversion, Windows Vista Ultimate Movie Maker, Apple iTunes Version 7.1.1, Adobe Photoshop Elements Version 5.0, Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint in various stand-alone and multitasking processes. Scores were standardised, averaged and then transformed into a percentage score.

Processor Manufacturer Overall grade as a percentage
Celeron 530 Intel 45% Pass conceded
Celeron 540 Intel 47% Pass conceded
Celeron 550 Intel 55% Pass
Pentium T2060 Intel 59% Pass
Pentium T2080 Intel 62% Pass
Pentium T2130 Intel 65% Credit
Pentium T2310 Intel 66% Credit
Pentium T2330 Intel 69% Credit
Core 2 Duo T5250 Intel 70% Credit
Core 2 Duo T5300 Intel 78% Distinction
Core 2 Duo T5450 Intel 76% Distinction
Core 2 Duo T5500 Intel 74% Credit
Core 2 Duo T5600 Intel 79% Distinction
Core 2 Duo T7250 Intel 87% High Distinction
AMD Turion 64 ML-34 AMD 46% Pass Conceded
AMD Turion 64 ML-37 AMD 52% Pass
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56 AMD 59% Pass
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 AMD 62% Pass
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 AMD 66% Pass

Verdict
Even using disparate notebook hardware it is clear that the Intel Core 2 architecture is a superior performer to the previous generation processors. The Intel's Core 2 Duo T7250 comes out a clear winner across the board.

The older Celeron and Pentium derived processors still hold their own quite well, and in many of the benchmarks the single core Celerons outperform the single core AMD Turion processors. The Pentium derived dual-core processors are at least a match for the Turion dual cores, but both are soundly outperformed by the Core 2 Duo processors.

The winners:

  • First place: Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
  • Second place: Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
  • Third place: Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

The losers:

Third last: Intel Celeron 540
Second last: AMD Turion 64 ML-34
Last: Intel Celeron 530

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    Bang for Buck? Anonymous -- 04/06/08

    What I'd really like to know is what's the best value processor to buy. Any chance you could add another page of results with the scores weighted by price?

    What a laugh Lord Watchdog -- 04/06/08

    These benchmarks are never indicative of real-world performance. It doesn't surprise me to see the AMD powerhouses at the top when it comes to 3D graphics but the results in mainstream applications like MS Office are obviously flawed for some reason.

    I have always found AMD processors, particularly Athlons and Turions to knock Intel's finest for six in MS Office and also Photoshop.

    Power users should aways give AMD the nod when buying a computer - they don't get asthmatic when the going gets tough. Intel tends to keep one waiting, a bit like our railways.

Add your opinion

Back to top

Featured