AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

It's as fast as we imagined, but we wish AMD's new dual-core chip played better with other computer parts out of the gate.

Hot on the heels of Intel's second-generation dual-core Extreme Edition 955 chip comes AMD's Athlon 64 FX-60. More than just a speed bump to AMD's ultra-high-end FX line, the Athlon 64 FX-60 features two processing cores, bringing the FX series into the modern multicore era.

Upside
Now that AMD's highest-end processor is dual core, we can paint a more straightforward desktop CPU picture. It was previously hard to explain that the Athlon 64 FX-57 was only a single-core CPU yet cost more than AMD's top-of-the-line dual-core Athlon 64 X2 4800+. Now gamers and enthusiasts that invest in an ultra-high-end FX-60 chip can take advantage of all the forthcoming games and applications due to incorporate multicore optimisations. But the FX-60 is not merely an insurance policy for the future; our early tests show the FX-60 is lightning-fast on today's apps, as well.

Application performance
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
BAPCo SysMark 2004 rating  
BAPCo SysMark 2004 Internet-content-creation rating  
BAPCo SysMark 2004 office-productivity rating  
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 (2.6GHz)
281 
353 
224 
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955 (3.46GHz)
262 
320 
214 
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (2.4GHz)
256 
308 
213 
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4GHz)
252 
303 
210 
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 840 (3.2GHz)
243 
295 
200 
Intel Pentium D 840 (3.2GHz)
238 
280 
202 

CPU-limited custom Half-Life 2 demo (in fps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Half-Life 2 1,024x768, no AA no AF  
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (2.4GHz)
140.6 
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 (2.6GHz)
138.2 
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4GHz)
130.4 
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955 (3.46GHz)
125 
Intel Pentium D 840 (3.2GHz)
106.3 
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 840 (3.2GHz)
104.4 

On our current suite of single-core and multithreaded benchmarks, the Athlon 64 FX-60 beats all other desktop chips on almost every test, including Intel's new Pentium Processor Extreme Edition 955 introduced at the end of December (the lone exception is a statistical tie with the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ on Half-Life 2).

Of particular note are our DivX 6.1 tests. The recent update to that application saw the introduction of multithreaded code. While Intel's Extreme Edition 955 chip did well on the straight video encoding, it couldn't compete with the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ on multitasking. The Athlon 64 FX-60 not only beat Intel's chip by a larger margin on the multitasking, it also trumped the Extreme Edition 955 on the encode portion.

We're curious to see how both of the new chips will perform on upcoming multithreaded games designed to take advantage of dual-core CPUs processing threads, but the early results favour AMD as strongly now as they did a few months back in our dual-core CPU prizefight.

Advertisement

Talkback 0 comments

Reviews by category

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured