Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz)

By Matthew Elliot, CNET.com on 05 May 2008 04:10 PM

Tags: apple, imac, 24-inch, desktop, 2.8ghz, model, ddr2, duo

ZDNet Australia Editors’ Choice

A slight bump to the specifications for the same price, the option to upgrade the graphics means the 24-inch iMac keeps the Editors' Choice it earned last year.

A bump to the frontside bus and a smidge more L2 cache can safely be classified as a minor update. But even slightly improved specifications, when they come at a lower price than those they replace, are appreciated. Last September, we tested the highest-end 24-inch model, which carried a baseline price of AU$3,339 and featured Intel's 2.8GHz Core 2 Extreme X7900 processor.

We're happy to report that the new AU$2,399 iMac sped past the previous model in CNET Labs, though it features roughly the same specs: a 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB of faster 800MHz RAM, a 320GB hard drive, and a midrange ATI Radeon graphics card. What's changed is that this model uses a Penryn-class processor that serves up 6MB of L2 cache, compared to the 4MB the previous Merom-class chip provided, while operating on a faster 1,066MHz frontside bus — up from 800MHz.

The biggest upgrade comes with the top-of-the-line iMac, the $2,999 model that sees the iMac top the 3GHz mark with 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo chip. That model also features a 512MB Nvidia GeForce 8800 GS graphics card. The 3.06GHz chip is an AU$300 upgrade on the lower-end 24-inch model we reviewed here, while the GeForce card adds AU$220 to the bill.

Contrary to earlier reports, the 3.06GHz chip is not the Core 2 Duo X9100, which is expected out later this summer when Intel launches its Centrino 2 (Montevina) platform. Instead, it's another Apple exclusive from Intel, which operates at the same clockspeed and on the same 1,066MHz bus as the forthcoming X9100 chip, but at a higher wattage. The updates the iMac received aren't game changing by any means, but they certainly do enough to maintain the iMac's Editors' Choice award and a strong recommendation among all-in-one PCs and mainstream desktops in general. In fact, we rate it higher than last year's model because the 24-inch iMac finally includes a graphics upgrade.

The design remains unchanged from last September's iMac models, which marked a change from the white Lucite design to the brushed-aluminium-and-glass chassis. For more on the design, please see our full review of the 20-inch iMac that introduced the new design last August.

We were impressed with the 24-inch iMac's showing last year in the labs, and this latest update showed marked improvement on our multitasking test as well as with CineBench. We weren't surprised to see iTunes performance stay the same, since it's largely dependent on CPU clockspeed. What we didn't expect was a 22-percent increase on our multimedia multitasking benchmark compared with that of last year's model, which was already way ahead of Dells' and Gateway's all-in-one PCs.

On CineBench 10, a 3D rendering test that taxes the CPU and graphics subsystems, the new iMac outpaced the older 24-inch model by eight percent, which is about the margin we'd expect between two systems released seven months apart. This iMac's faster frontside bus, faster memory, and larger L2 cache each plays a role in its improved performance over last year's model, as does the new version of Leopard (10.5.2), we suspect (we've experienced some problems with our Photoshop CS3 script recently, on this and other systems, so unfortunately we have no Photoshop results to report at this time).

Apple iTunes encoding test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2008 model)
138 
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2007 model)
139 
Apple iMac (20-inch, 2.4GHz)
161 
Dell XPS One
174 
HP Pavilion Slimeline s3330f
193 
Apple Mac Mini
194 
Gateway One
207 

Multimedia multitasking test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2008 model)
407 
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2007 model)
522 
Apple iMac (20-inch, 2.4GHz)
597 
Apple Mac Mini
721 
Gateway One
938 
HP Pavilion Slimeline s3330f
957 
Dell XPS One
1070 

CineBench
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Rendering multiple CPUs   
Rendering single CPU   
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2008 model)
6180 
3244 
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2007 model)
5709 
3035 
Apple iMac (20-inch, 2.4GHz)
4624 
2599 
Dell XPS One
4507 
2368 
HP Pavilion Slimeline s3330f
4316 
2247 
Apple Mac Mini
4069 
2168 
Gateway One
3787 
1998 

System configurations:

Apple iMac (20-inch, 2.4GHz)
Apple OS X; 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7700; 2GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 256MB ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro graphics chip; 320GB 7,200rpm hard drive

Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2007 model)
Apple OS X 10.4.10; 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900; 2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 256MB ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro graphics chip; 750GB 7,200rpm hard drive

Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz, 2008 model)
Apple OS X 10.5.2; 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; 2GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 256MB ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro graphics chip; 320GB 7,200rpm hard drive

Apple Mac Mini
Apple OS X; 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; 1GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 64MB (shared) Intel GMA 950 integrated graphics chip; 120GB 5,400rpm Hitachi hard drive

Dell XPS One
Windows Vista Home Premium; 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E6550; 2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 256MB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 graphics chip; 500GB 7,200rpm hard drive

Gateway One
Windows Vista Home Premium; 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7250; 3GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 256MB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT graphics chip; 500GB 7,200rpm hard drive

HP Pavilion Slimline S3330f
Windows Vista Home Premium; 2.8GHz AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+; 2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 256MB (shared) Nvidia GeForce 6150SE integrated graphics chip; 500GB 7,200rpm Samsung hard drive

Advertisement

User comments | 2 comments

Add your comment

  1. Anonymous30/05/2008, 09:52 AM

    rating 10/10

    Looks to me like that part was just taken from the previuos review - perils of Cut and paste
    I guess

  2. Anonymous10/05/2008, 05:21 AM

    rating 10/10

    News Flash ZDnet editor... Leopard has been out for a while... you might want to work on your copy/paste skills ;)

    "Might want to hold off until Leopard is released to save yourself the cost of an OS upgrade"

Overview

» Enlarge

The good:
  • Industry-leading design
  • Big, beautiful display
  • Excellent application performance
The bad:
  • Higher-end model features same midrange graphics card of lower-end models
  • Free phone support ends after 90 days
  • Might want to hold off until Leopard is released to save yourself the cost of an OS upgrade
The bottomline:

With the same elegant design as its 20-inch, 2.4GHz sibling, the 24-inch, 2.8GHz iMac offers 30 percent more screen area and a modest performance boost. The iMac competes with the PC desktop market now better than perhaps any previous Mac to date, but the added cost of the larger, faster model might put off some buyers — especially if you are a gamer or an upgrade enthusiast.

RRP: AU$3339.00

Editors’ rating:

8.1/10

Related topics:

apple, imac, 24-inch, desktop

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Customs | Murray Harrison, CIO

Australian Customs CIO Murray Harrison dislikes SLAs and runs away if a vendor talks to him about innovation. In this interview, he also explains why getting excited about gadgets can be dangerous and talks about how Customs' outsourcing strategy has evolved.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Munir Kotadia iPhone suckers test our patience
    So how many of you have bought a 3G iPhone? Do you feel like a sucker? If you don't, maybe you will once your first bill arrives.
  • Array Westpac bank: AVG's toughest competitor
    The next time you're buying antivirus software, don't go direct to Symantec or McAfee. Don't download free antivirus. And definitely don't see Harvey Norman. Ask your bank — they're quite literally giving the stuff away.
  • Array Will you manage in the exabyte era?
    Mammoth growth in storage volumes is a fact of life, but even so it's helpful to pause occasionally and try and work out whether our information strategies have fallen hopelessly out of step with the pace of technological growth and changes in costs.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured