Palm versus Pocket PC: Which is better?

By Rick Broida, Special to ZDNet
26 February 2004 01:15 PM
Tags: mobile, palmone, pocket, vs, 2003, review, pda, pc
PDA prize fight

Input your info effortlessly

Winner:
Windows Mobile


Tying the score, Windows has the input edge.

Palm OS and Windows Mobile PDAs are very similar when it comes to capturing data on the fly. With nothing more than a plastic pen, you can enter information by tapping or writing on the screen. The tapping aspect is pretty much a wash--an onscreen keyboard lets you "type" letters, numbers, and symbols--though on most Palm OS models, the keyboard consumes half the screen.

With writing, disparities emerge. The Palm OS has long relied on Graffiti, a handwriting-recognition system primarily based on standard block characters. But with the release of Palm OS 5.2 came Graffiti 2.0, based on a more natural character set. For newcomers, it's a breeze to learn, but it's a major hassle for Graffiti veterans because it's so different from the old system.

Windows Mobile offers not one, not two, but three handwriting-recognition options. The first, Block Recognizer, is a letter-perfect clone of the original Graffiti, making for an easy transition from the Palm OS camp. The second, Letter Recognizer, is based on Communication Intelligence's Jot, which also was the basis for Graffiti 2.0. Finally, there's Transcriber, which allows you to write anywhere on the screen (rather than in a designated input area) and in cursive, no less. Transcriber works remarkably well, as long as you write fairly legibly.

The Windows Mobile keyboard, Block Recognizer, and Letter Recognizer are all virtual input areas, meaning they appear and disappear as needed. Most Palm OS PDAs come with a permanent Graffiti area that reduces screen real estate. But recent higher-end models, such as the PalmOne Tungsten T3 and the Sony CLIE PEG-NX80V/G, have virtual input areas, just like Windows Mobile. Nonetheless, you still get only one handwriting option instead of three, so Windows Mobile indisputably wins the round.

  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8
Palm x              
Windows Mobile 2003   x            

 Back to intro 
Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    Try managing many files in a P ...Anonymous -- 27/02/04

    Try managing many files in a Palm - the concept of directory structure or file management doesn't even exist on Palms (it may on the latest OS, but by then I'd moved to Windows)
    How about having your review cover eBooks and readers - almost a raison d'etre for a PDA?
    Put 800 eBooks into a SD memory unit, and see whether Palm or PocketPC copes best. It isn't even a contest.
    That's 2 areas Pocket PC wins in - still sure Palms are better?

    I've been with Palm for the la ...Anonymous -- 02/04/04

    I've been with Palm for the last 5 years and have loved it. However, it was unstable, a bit kludgy when trying to integrate to my PC and a friend introduced me to the Pocket PC. Well, I've just bought an iPAQ 5550 and can't believe I ever loved Palm. PPC is awesome, stable, better synchronisation with outlook and the desktop (no need for middle ware). I can't understand why you rated Palm better. Get with the times guys. PPC is the future and Palm should be worried.

    obviously the two respondents ...Anonymous -- 03/04/04

    obviously the two respondents before me have not used the new palms with OS5+.

    i used to own a handspring, then a toshiba e310, now i own the hp2210 and palm tungsten t2. palms by far are better. this review is accurate. actually i even disagree with the email part, palm should have won that too rather than draw.

    another main palm advantage: battery life!
    Palm last 3x longger than PPCs and thats with heavy use of bluetooth (i use it for sms and hotsync). PPCs cant last the day with me but Palms make it to 3 days without a recharge. That is KEY to owning a PDA why by a PDA if it is not truly portable?!?! i have to lug around a power supply everywhere i take my 2210.

    My only gripes about Palms: Multimedia and GPRS websurfing. MP3 playback volume is way too low for palm and Kinoma is difficult to handle for video playback.

    as with GPRS, Palm has to have the settings for your mobile operator. if they dont list your mobile operator it cant be used. PPC has customizable settings for IR/bluetooth GPRS connection through a cellphone.

    The report does not mention th ...Anonymous -- 13/04/04

    The report does not mention the availability of Decuma, Calligrapher and other third party hand writing applications which can make both PDA's far more usable. Further there are add-ons (freeware)that do allow the use of the whole screen for text entry on Palm PDAs.

    No mention is made that Palm only supports one application at a time (unlike Pocket PC which is multi-threaded) but Palm is much faster in loading apps, and unlike Pocket PC does not have the problem of the memory getting flooded.

    Also not much comments are given about the fact that though Pocket PC offers a large screen estate, its mainly 240x320 as opposed to most palm based PDA's which are 320x320 and are much more crisp and clear when it comes to text.

    But on the whole as mentioned Pocket PC is more suitable for multimedia oriented activities while Palm is more a business organizer (with multimedia in the newer models). Though one wonders if so much multimedia is needed when the main idea of a PDA is for "personal productivity" but that i guess is a "religious" argument.

    I am sure if Microsoft can review their approach on Windows Pocket PC edition and change it from a scaled down Windows UI to something more useable (like Palm has or better!) it would make it a bigger hit as it seems the Pocket PC PDA's offer more features and software straight out of the box compared with Palm based PDA's.

    With a file manager system lik ...Anonymous -- 26/05/04

    With a file manager system like "super utility" from Handmark for your Palm, you can create directories ets & have everything organised easily - just like windows!

    What a corrupt account of whic ...Anonymous -- 17/10/04

    What a corrupt account of which is better, I can't believe the bias you can print and get away with it. I wonder how much ZDNet was paid for this shambles of a comparison. For a start you forgot to mention any of the Exchange Server 2003 features of Windows Mobile, while your account for better Office support relies on a 3rd party program, while you pan WM for not supporting Mac except via a 3rd party program. Hmmm, sounds a bit inconsistent. I personally would put Office documents ahead of Mac synchronization anyway. Then again if you have Exchange Server (which a lot of people do have) then you can sync over the air, very nice, I use it everyday. Yet you say that PC syncing is better on the Palm, even though WM comes bundled with Outlook, or did you forget that. When I have used a Palm with Outlook it came up with a very annoying security message every time, correct me if I'm wrong on that, but I would say that is not flawless.

    As for the user interface in my "informal survey" I found all my respondents liked Windows Mobile much better. As for the PIM software you call it a draw then go onto mention that all WM devices support voice notes, and these sync with Outlook for later replay or you can email them.

    As for saying Palm software is better than Windows mobile is one of the biggest mistakes you could have done. As a software engineer I can say that its definitely about quality not quantity. The tools provided to people such as myself are many times better on the windows front, Mobile or not. Perhaps the biggest thing you didn't mention was the .Net Compact Framework, which enables developers to produce high quality applications very quickly. Palm does not have the Compact Framework, and if your comeback includes the words Java then you are missing the point. My primary language used to be Java but it really doesn't stack up these days against the .Net Framework, not from a language POV but from the support given to developers.

    It is a shame that so many people will read this article and go and purchase a Palm when they are inferior in so many ways. Shame on you ZDNet, I used to think you were for the most part impartial; this is a complete sham of a report.

    I am not a MS supporter, I have no financial ties with any MS product, I just think they have a much better product in my many years experience. Perhaps you should have included a segment on cost, Palm knows they are not as good and charge less (or MS thinks they are better), however I didn't see that mentioned anywhere.

    i dont know pocket pc and pda ...Anonymous -- 20/10/04

    i dont know pocket pc and pda hv difference

    Palm tx Anonymous -- 24/11/08

    All i have to say is that the palm tx far surpasses any pocket pc

Add your opinion

Reviews by category

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue 12 days without ADSL: A local loop eulogy
    When your broadband speeds are limited to 38Kbps it's not hard to join the ranks of people demanding the NBN already. Telstra's copper network is a renovator's delight.
  • Array An abridged history of the Aussie internet
    Journalist Glenda Korporaal has written "20 years of the internet in Australia" to commemorate two decades of AARNET. On this week's Twisted Wire I talk to Glenda and Chris Hancock, the CEO of AARNET.
  • Array G'Day USA: Aussie start-ups head to America
    The G'Day USA: Australia Week campaign today announced the finalists for the Innovation Shoot Out event, which will see eight Australian technology start-ups travel to San Francisco in January 2010 to demonstrate the commercial viability of their products in the US.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured