Advertisement
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
Pocket-sized productivity: 5 PDAs tested


September 30, 2003
URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/coolgear/pdas/soa/Pocket-sized-productivity-5-PDAs-tested/0,139023392,120279110,00.htm




 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

Pocket-sized productivity: 5 PDAs testedPDAs are rapidly gaining in popularity, but with new wireless capabilities being added, how can you possibly do without one?

Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) have been around in one form or another almost since the beginning of personal computing. How many readers out there remember the Timex data watch with the innovative data uplink achieved by holding the watch itself up to your PC screen and letting the program run? Technically it was wireless, albeit with one-way data. In more recent times the PDA market has really livened up with Palm and Compaq leading the way initially with their Pilot and iPAQ range of products respectively. Nowadays it seems that everyone is getting in on the act with the likes of Acer, Toshiba, and even Dell hawking PDAs.

On the other side of the coin, vendors who have traditionally dealt with portable data devices such as GPS tracking/mapping systems and warehouse stock control such as Intermec and Symbol are also finding markets for more rugged and warehouse-friendly handheld computing devices that can be integrated with back-end warehouse or sales systems, for example.

Naturally the more vendors, the more competition for both price and features, so it can only get better for us in the coming months and years.

In this review we looked at PDAs with inbuilt 802.1x wireless LAN capabilities. Yes, you too can now go to work and surf the Internet in the lunchroom or bathroom on your handheld digital assistant.

Seriously though, there are many legitimate and useful jobs a PDA can be used for in most companies, providing the organisation ensures a correct plan is established for their use and the appropriate training is provided for staff.

For example, they can be used to link with the company database server to update stock on hand and prices for sales reps on the road or mobile warehouse staff. Or for mobile sales presentations with a portable data projector when a notebook is too cumbersome or simply not required--the PDA can perform the slideshow presentation just as well. PDAs also have the benefit of size and portability, and enable the operator to very quickly turn the device on and access the information required without having to handle a notebook and wait for it to boot up.

Probably my one piece of important advice for the decision makers reading this is for companies to be aware of the potential Customer Relationship Management (CRM) factor with PDAs. Yes, years ago CRM was the catch cry of every business manager and analyst, and if you didn't have a good CRM strategy, your business was bound to be swallowed by a bigger, more organised fish.

While CRM is definitely a core part of any business' daily operations, it doesn't necessarily need to be altered dramatically just because the technology evangelists are touting a new application or technology. The companies who successfully pulled off the implementation of a CRM application did it with planning, training, and customisation. Instead of trying to mould employees around the limitations of the applications on offer, they designed custom modules, applications, and procedures to allow the CRM applications to work with the staff.

As with anything new, change is sure to create a wave amongst the operators, it is only a natural human reaction after all. However, with planning and a controlled roll-out with plenty of training, the migration to the new technologies can not only be painless at the end of the day, but also it will be sure to keep the bean counters happy.

Keeping in sync
More and more in the near future we will see PDA-to-PDA synchronisation and/or data recognition on a portable level and also more widespread usage in the new Wi-Fi hotspots being set up. It is handy sitting down in a hotspot at a café with a hot chocolate and croissant and surfing the Net on your notebook. However, if you simply want to know when the next train is, or where your next appointment is since your assistant rearranged your schedule this morning, and you happen to be wandering through a hotspot, you are hardly going to have a notebook in your top pocket . The most useful device in this situation is a wireless capable PDA.

The five vendors who supplied products to us for this review fall into two categories: Hewlett-Packard, Palm, and Toshiba submitted standard non-ruggedised PDAs, while Intermec and the Symbol sent us toughened PDAs for heavy-duty environments.

HP iPAQ H5450HP iPAQ H5450

The HP's Secure Digital/Multimedia Card (SD/MMC) flash memory card slot will make many traditional iPAQ users very happy, since previous models needed the bulky "backpack" just to support memory cards for extra storage. This unit has both Bluetooth and 802.11b wireless.

Interestingly on the security side of things, the iPAQ includes a biometric fingerprint scanner located below the central navigation button below the screen.

While the concept of configuring the wireless network adaptor seemed very straightforward with the iPAQ, we seemed to be thwarted at every move; it took a considerable amount of time to achieve a network connection. It may have been a firmware fault with the unit or it may not have likes of our test rig access point. (802.1x is a international networking standard, and all devices carrying the badge should theoretically be able to interoperate with other brands--it doesn't always work out that way, of course.)

Whatever the reason, there was much fiddling, resetting and general difficulties in configuring the internal card.

You should always ensure you test one of these units on your WLAN before committing to the order, just to ensure your technicians do not experience the same problems that we did.

The unit is very neat; the iPAQ engineers in this third or fourth generation have certainly learnt lessons and they have delivered a package that is very difficult to beat.

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

Product: HP iPAQ H5450
Price: AU$1299
Vendor: HP
Phone: 132 393
Web: www.hp.com.au

Interoperability: ½
Windows-based, may have wireless issues (see review).

Futureproofing:
SD slot, WLAN, and Bluetooth integrated, also includes fingerprint scanner.

ROI:
Very good price for the included features.

Service:
12-month warranty.

Rating: ½

Palm Tungsten CPalm Tungsten C

The first things we noticed about the Palm is the smaller screen and the tiny keyboard just below it. Then we realised the larger screen wasn't necessary because on most PDAs, part of the screen is consumed by a virtual keyboard operated with the stylus. The inbuilt keyboard is surprisingly easy to use albeit small.

Obviously this unit runs Palm OS, which we found very easy to use and navigate. This unit can only charge using the cradle, while the HP and Toshiba allows you to connect the plug pack directly to them. Not a huge problem, but it means if you want to charge the Palm at home or on a business trip, you need to take the cradle with you.

Both the rugged units only charge through their cradles, however they are only really intended for use in or around a business.

The wireless networking configuration option was given as part of the initial wizard setup. Although the unit detected our access point, the wizard assumes you have DHCP running in your network infrastructure. If you don't, you need to enter the IP address, gateway, and name servers manually in a separate configuration page.

The Tungsten C is quite a refined device--the built-in keyboard and the use of the Palm OS could sway users towards the unit, particularly those who have used Palm previously. The smaller screen size is not a real disadvantage, particularly considering the inbuilt keyboard and the screen real estate occupied by the virtual keyboards on other PDAs.

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

Product: Palm Tungsten C
Price: AU$979
Vendor: Palm
Phone: 1800 350 535
Web: www.palm.com/au

Interoperability:
Palm OS-based, WLAN easily configured, mini keyboard may assist some users.

Futureproofing:
SD slot and WLAN integrated. Smaller display may hinder some applications.

ROI:
Good price for features, but should have Bluetooth at this price.

Service:
12-month warranty.

Rating: ½

Toshiba e750Toshiba e750

The e750 is a second-generation Toshiba PDA and is surprisingly similar in looks to the first, the e740. As with the e740, there is only an option of either integrated wireless LAN or Bluetooth, not both. The Toshiba includes both CompactFlash and SD/MMC flash card slots.

Also running the Microsoft Pocket PC OS, the Toshiba's tools are not as integrated as those in the iPAQ.

The wireless LAN configuration of the Toshiba, while not as directly accessible as that of the iPAQ, was the easiest of all to set up and configure. We were up and running within a couple of minutes.

While the Toshiba is a very nice unit and has some attractive features and functions, it doesn't really stand up to the iPAQ's refined development. It will be interesting to see where the next couple of generations of the Toshiba PDAs takes it.

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

Product: Toshiba e750 Pocket PC
Price: AU$1299
Vendor: Toshiba
Phone: 133 070
Web: www.isd.toshiba.com.au

Interoperability: ½
Windows-based, WLAN very easily configured.

Futureproofing: ½
SD and CF slots, WLAN integrated.

ROI:
Good price for features, but should have Bluetooth at this price.

Service:
12-month warranty.

Rating: ½

Intermec 700Intermec 700

T&B Editor's choiceThis rugged PDA is certainly not pocket sized, unless you wear overalls and have that big kangaroo pouch in the front. Which is probably exactly where this type of PDA is aimed. It has a sturdy plastic construction with a large numeric keypad.

You can choose between monochrome or colour units (we looked at the mono), which have integrated Wireless LAN and a bar code scanner built in. It's tough enough for a warehouse or freight distribution environment. There are no flash memory card slots available on this unit, but again, in a warehouse environment, you don't want anything that came be fiddled about with or come loose accidentally.

The Intermec 700 runs Microsoft Pocket PC operating system with a few Intermec proprietary apps thrown in to control the custom hardware. The stylus has a neat length of nylon cording attached to it that ensures it can't go wandering.

The wireless LAN configuration was almost as easy as the Toshiba to work out, and the unit was up and running in a little under five minutes.

This unit is certainly the most rugged of the lot tested, but also the biggest. Symbol offers a wide range of options and features. It is probably worth testing both the Symbol and Intermec solutions to see which fits your particular business operation better.

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

Product: Intermec 700 series
Price: AU$3677
Vendor: Intermec
Phone: 1800 333 120
Web: www.intermec.com

Interoperability: ½
Windows-based, WLAN very easily configured.

Futureproofing:
No expansion slots available, but includes bar code scanner. Very rugged.

ROI:
More expensive than the Symbol base unit, but the final price may change depending on your needs.

Service:
12-month warranty.

Rating:

Symbol PPT8800Symbol PPT8800

Following a very similar philosophy to the Intermec, the Symbol PDA is much smaller but still bulky in a pocket.

Like the Intermec, the Symbol unit has built in Wireless LAN and also a laser bar code scanner. Neither units come with protective covers however their design ensures that they would be hard to damage (although the touch screens leave us wondering a little what would happen if one was pressed a little too hard or jabbed with a sharp implement). They both come with handy elastic straps on the rear, so operators can slip them around their wrists to reduce the chance of dropping the unit.

Running Microsoft Windows CE .NET this device has a distinctively different feel to the Microsoft Pocket PC Devices (more like your traditional Microsoft desktop OS environment). The stylus is held in a recessed silo on the rear of the unit. While not attached to the PDA like the Intermec's was, the Symbol stylus is bright yellow.

While the Symbol unit was not difficult to set up on a wireless LAN, we found that it refused to talk with our test rig's access point. (Refer to the troubles that we had with the HP unit.) Nevertheless, this is not the first wireless network card or access point that has refused to interoperate between brands--like all relatively new technologies, it may take a while to settle down and get everything working as it should. The only way to be 100 percent sure is to test before you buy. When we used a different brand of access point, the Symbol unit immediately recognised it and worked as it should.

Quite compact for such a rugged unit, it's definitely worth considering if you need a tough handheld.

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

Product: Symbol PPT8846
Price: AU$3000 (subject to variations)
Vendor: Symbol
Phone: 03 9862 7000
Web: www.symbol.com

Interoperability: ½
Windows-based, may have wireless issues (see review).

Futureproofing:
No expansion slots available, but includes integrated bar code scanner. Very rugged.

ROI:
Cheaper than the Intermec, but would need to be compared with your exact specifications.

Service:
12-month warranty.

Rating:

Specifications

Product
Price (RRP as tested)
1299
3677
979
Vendor
HP
Intermec
Palm
Phone
13 23 93
1800 333 120
1800 350 535
Web
Warranty
12 months
12 months
12 months
Processor type/speed
Intel Xscale PXA250 400MHz
Intel StrongARM SA-1110RISC 206MHz
Intel Xscale PXA255 400MHz
Operating System
Microsoft Pocket PC 2002
Microsoft Pocket PC 2002
Palm OS 5.2.1
Battery Type
Lithium Ion
Lithium-Ion
Lithium Ion
Battery level indicator
Yes
Yes
Yes
Rated battery life
Up to 10 hours in active mode, backlight off
8-10 hours (application dependent)
Application dependent
System RAM (test config)
64MB
64MB
64MB
Expansion Slots
SD/MMC
CompactFlash Type II
SD/MMC, Palm Universial Connector
Integrated Wireless Type(s)
802.11B, Bluetooth
Choice of GPRS, 802.11B, or Bluetooth
802.11B
Display Type
TFT colour display
Mono LCD
TFT colour display
Display Resolution
240 x 320
240 x 320
320 x 320
Display Size (mm diagonal)
97
97
N/A
Display Palette
65K colours
Monocrhome
65K colours
Dimensions (HxWxD mm)
138x84x16mm
184x89x38mm
120x70x16mm
Weight, incl batteries (g)
206
454
179
Desktop O/S supported
Windows 98 or higher
Windows 98 or higher
Windows 98 or higher, Mac OS


Product
Price (RRP as tested)
$3000 (subject to variations)
1299
Vendor
Symbol
Toshiba
Phone
03 9862 7000
133 070
Web
Warranty
12 months
12 months
Processor type/speed
Intel Xscale PXA250 400MHz
Intel Xscale PXA255 400MHz
Operating System
Microsoft Windows CE 4.1
Microsoft Pocket PC 2003
Battery Type
Lithium-Ion
Lithium-Ion
Battery level indicator
Yes
Yes
Rated battery life
Application dependent
Application dependent
System RAM (test config)
32MB
64MB
Expansion Slots
CompactFlash Type II
SD/MMC, CompactFlash Type II
Integrated Wireless Type(s)
802.11B, Bluetooth
Choice of 802.11B or Bluetooth
Display Type
TFT colour display
TFT colour display
Display Resolution
240 x 320
240 x 320
Display Size (mm diagonal)
97
97
Display Palette
65K colours
65K colours
Dimensions (HxWxD mm)
145x80x33mm
125x80x16mm
Weight, incl batteries (g)
300
197
Desktop O/S supported
Windows 98 or higher
Windows 98 or higher

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

How we tested

Interoperability
What platform does the device run on? How easy is it to use the connectivity features such as WLAN?

Futureproofing
What expansion slots are available? Are emerging standards like WLAN and Bluetooth supported?

ROI
Are the features and functionality suitable for the target market?

Service
How long is the warranty and what are the conditions?

Our test aimed to get an estimate of the maximum wireless range available to the PDAs and whether the open distance achieved differed greatly between the models.

We setup our wireless access point outside our building, connected by a RJ45 network cable to the rest of the network, we then browsed to a test Web page on our server form each PDAs, testing at marked 10M intervals. If the PDA included site survey tools we used those also, to get an indication of the current bandwidth and signal strength available at each point.

Our test rig included an Intel P4 1.7GHz network client, an Intel Celeron 1Ghz notebook with Sparklan 802.1b network card, a Linksys 54G network card and a Linksys WAP 54G Wireless Access Point.

As described in the article no testing could be completed on either the HP or the Symbol devices.

The Intermec reached 106 metres from our AP. The Toshiba was an acceptable 50 metres while the Palm was only able to manage 32 metres.

Look out for...

  • Plenty of expandable memory storage, such as CompactFlash and Secure Digital/Multimedia Card slots.
  • Fast processing speed, particularly if you are planning to run processor-intensive applications such as multimedia presentations.
  • Secure docking in the PDA for the stylus.
  • Expansion capabilities, such as VGA output, digital camera, Bluetooth, and so on.

Sample scenarios

  1. Company: BB's Bargain Book Basement. This retail chain wants to roll out wireless handhelds for its sales, shelf-stacking and warehouse staff so they can access catalogues and stock databases wherever they are.

    Approximate budget: $4000 per handheld.

    Requires: 150 robust handheld devices with Wi-Fi built in.

    Concerns: The company insists on handhelds with wireless capability built in. The devices need to be relatively robust and have a Web browser.

    Best solution: The best choice would have to be either the Intermec or Symbol; the ruggedness of these devices perfectly suit this application. It is very difficult to pick a clear winner. The Symbol was definitely the more compact of the two units. Battery life would be optimal on Intermect unit with the monochrome screen. Both docking cradles also feature a space for a spare battery, which could be very handy in these environments.

  2. Company: Squeez-ee Juice Company. This company needs wireless devices for their sales staff who randomly come into the office during the week to access the database, and update their calendars and contact lists while they are there.

    Approximate budget: $1200 per handheld.

    Requires: 80 handheld devices with Wi-Fi built in.

    Concerns: Devices must include a Web browser to access via the WLAN. Should be relatively light and portable for use in the field.

    Best solution: In this case, the best choice is definitely the HP iPAQ 5450; its level of refinement is ahead of both the Toshiba and the Palm. It lacks a CF slot, but has Bluetooth or wireless LAN integrated. The protective casing shows HP's design efforts to provide as much protection as possible without affecting the usability of the device.

T&B Editor's choiceEditors' choice: Intermec 700 Series
Highly commended: Symbol PPT8846, HP iPAQ H5450

The Intermec is ideal for a rough warehouse environment with its rugged casing, monochrome screen, barcode scanner, and excellent battery handling options. We were equally impressed with Symbol's rugged handheld, but wireless issues meant we could not award it an Editors' Choice. Similarly, the HP iPAQ combines the best of HP and Compaq's handheld expertise in the best office product we looked at, but once again the wireless problems we had in testing robbed it of the top gong.

Final words
PDAs are certainly very handy tools providing adequate planning and training is given on their implementation within the business. As with any relatively new technology, there will always be the knockers or slow adopters resistant to change. It is worthwhile listening and evaluating their opinions, as they are the ones who must use these tools and ultimately decide whether they are effective or not. Also, it is worthwhile ensuring you match your tools with needs; as you can see, these devices are designed for very different applications.

Subscribe now to Australian Technology & Business magazine.

 PDAs

 PDA reviews:

 HP iPAQ H5450
 Palm Tungsten C
 Toshiba e750
 Intermec 700
 Symbol PPT8800

 Specifications
 How we tested
 Look out for...
 Sample scenarios
 Editor's choice
 Final words
 About RMIT

About RMIT Test Labs

RMIT Test Labs RMIT IT Test Labs is an independent testing institution based in Melbourne, Victoria, performing IT product testing for clients such as IBM, Coles-Myer, and a wide variety of government bodies. In the Labs' testing for T&B, they are in direct contact with the clients supplying products and the magazine is responsible for the full cost of the testing. The findings are the Labs' own--only the specifications of the products to be tested are provided by the magazine. For more information on RMIT, please contact the Lab Manager, Steven Turvey.

Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved.
ZDNET is a registered service mark of CBS Interactive. ZDNET Logo is a service mark of CBS Interactive.