OpenOffice.org 2.0

OpenOffice.org 2.0

Submit

Overview

OpenOffice.org 2.0, the freeware version of Sun's StarOffice 8, is a great deal for small-business users who don't mind browsing online forums for technical support. But enterprises are better served by StarOffice 8.

OpenOffice.org 2.0 is an undeniable bargain. This robust, free productivity suite offers full-featured word-processing, spreadsheet, database and presentation applications -- and it won't cost you or your business a penny. Too often, freeware carries a you-get-what-you-pay-for caveat, but OpenOffice is the real deal and a solid alternative to Microsoft Office 2003, particularly for small-office or home users who don't mind browsing online forums for technical support. OpenOffice reads and writes Microsoft Office files -- albeit imperfectly -- and it supports multiple operating systems, including Linux, Mac OS X, Sun Solaris and Windows. Although Sun and its allies are far from creating a multiplatform suite to end the market domination of Microsoft Office, they have made OpenOffice an inexpensive alternative that's well worth a look.

OpenOffice.org 2.0 is the open-source version of Sun's StarOffice 8 desktop suite, which costs US$70 to download. In 2000, Sun made the StarOffice source code publicly available and invited the open-source community to join Sun's developers in shaping future upgrades. StarOffice 8 has more extras, including additional presentation backgrounds and clip art, as well as better administration and Microsoft Office-migration tools.

At first glance, OpenOffice.org 2.0 and StarOffice 8 are identical. The core applications in each suite (Base, Calc, Draw, Impress and Writer) have matching interfaces, but you'll find differences as you dig deeper. Take the Impress presentations program, for instance: StarOffice provides more than 70 visual backgrounds in its Presentation Wizard, while OpenOffice has only three. StarOffice also comes with more than 1,800 clip-art graphics, while OpenOffice provides less than half that number (although you can download more at the Open Clip Art Library). More importantly for business users, only StarOffice provides a variety of tools for administration and Microsoft Office migration.

Like StarOffice, OpenOffice lets you save documents as PDF files -- a handy feature for sending read-only files via email, and one not found in Microsoft Office 2003. The Calc spreadsheet in version 2.0 can handle spreadsheets as large as 65,536 rows (the same as Excel), which is great for importing huge Excel files.

OpenOffice.org 2.0 supports the OpenDocument Format (ODF), an open-source file format with the ambitious goal of replacing Microsoft Office's formats as the workplace standard. StarOffice 8 supports ODF too; Microsoft Office 2003 does not. Does it matter? Not yet. Although the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has mandated support for ODF, most business and home users neither require the benefits nor want the headache of dealing with another file format.

So what's it going to be, OpenOffice or StarOffice? Businesses requiring professional-calibre support and superior administration tools should opt for StarOffice. But for small-business and home users who don't mind combing bulletin boards for support tips, OpenOffice is a solid, money-saving alternative.

Because it's open source, OpenOffice relies entirely upon peer support, so you're out of luck if you were hoping for a company rep to walk you through a puzzling question via a toll-free call or an online forum. Luckily, OpenOffice has an enthusiastic developer community. The OpenOffice Web site includes community-written tutorials and manuals, including installation and usage guides for individual applications. These tutorials are well written but lack screenshots to illustrate the tasks being explained. Community support, frankly, is hit or miss. We browsed the mailing list archive and saw posts from users seeking help. Most had one or two replies from fellow users, but it was often unclear if they solved the original poster's problem. Such is the nature of free, community-supported software.

(Back to top)

Talkback

ZDNet Australia Live

Before accusing me of fudging the figures, that was the percentage in April, the latest available. It seems that as the advantage of the ...

18 minutes ago by GregoryB1 on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Currently about 50% of connections are at the 100Mb/s rate.
As a consequence, ARPU is significantly higher than the projected figures.

26 minutes ago by GregoryB1 on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Currently about 50% of connections are at the 100Mb/s rate.
As a consequence, ARPU is significantly higher than the projected figures.

26 minutes ago by GregoryB1 on NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?

Wireless currently carries less than 2% of total internet data traffic. Simply to carry the existing traffic, we would need 50 times the ...

41 minutes ago by GregoryB1 on Blowing the digital dividend on wireless NBN

The stupidest part about a wireless solution for the burbs is that it will actually cost more to put an antenna on the roof to get the si...

1 hour ago by GregoryB1 on Blowing the digital dividend on wireless NBN

The problem is not range of the cell in the urban areas where Turnbull wants LTE instead of fibre, it is the number of users. In urban ar...

1 hour ago by GregoryB1 on Blowing the digital dividend on wireless NBN

After the Second World War, the pursuit of pleasure domains the entire world atmosphere, Lancel (Lancel) to adapt rapidly into the demand...

2 hours ago by PokArrackpask on Spam sees Westnet blocked by BigPond

RT @DellEnterprise: Dell Secureworks talks with ZDNet about Android's biggest #security flaws - http://t.co/LSFLQVFq #infosec

2 hours ago by ostejskal on twitter, retweet

NBN users opt for 100Mbps: Customers are picking the top fibre plan that is available on the National Broadband ... http://t.co/sjtFSU3g

3 hours ago by ozspeedtest on twitter, retweet

"Customers are picking the top fibre plan that is available on the National Broadband Network (NBN), more than a... http://t.co/M3P24Htn

3 hours ago by redditau on twitter, retweet

Another thing I found so misleading here is the step on how you assume to make the USB bootable . (The NTLDR needs to be renamed to USBNT...

3 hours ago by WindowsAnalyzer on Boot Windows XP from a USB flash drive

You can also use the help of these links, just incase your stuff failed, I probably got Windows build by using the Pebuilder as per the i...

3 hours ago by WindowsAnalyzer on Boot Windows XP from a USB flash drive

RT @CorrieB: An iPad for every child: Inevitable or impossible? http://t.co/I7uS8l9s Thx to @timbuckteeth for this; http://t.co/jxkqIRIp

5 hours ago by njdixpin on twitter, retweet

RT @MADinMelbourne: roxon "will enable more families to access credit" @MLolderandwiser: Privacy Act amendments http://t.co/Mv4c7PC2 via @zdnetaustralia

6 hours ago by GreenUpOz on twitter, retweet