AU security researchers need legal advice: CERT

The technical head of CERT, Jeff Carpenter, says Australian researchers should familiarise themselves with copyright laws in the context of reverse engineering malicious code to avoid hassles with DMCA-like legislation.

"Legal issues have become more and more complicated... I'm not familiar with the law in Australia, but within the United States, the DMCA and other laws are making things complicated," he told ZDNet Australia during a recent interview.

Carpenter says that conducting analysis on malicious code, such as a worm payload or Trojan binary, may result in legal problems stemming from copyright law.

"If you're going to do work in this area you we recommend you consult legal counsel before you... find yourself in a sticky legal situation," he said.

Reverse engineering is a vital tool when responding to severe incidents. By reverse engineering worms and exploits, researchers can look beyond what's happening at that moment and start formulating a response.

"When you have something like [the recent worm] Slammer attacking... you don't necessarily know if there's something else that hasn't been activated yet," he said.

Whilst the legal issue is a concern, it's not an intractable one. Legal advice on how to go about this type of research can protect researchers. CERT has consulted its lawyers and is able to move forward with reverse engineering exercises.

"We have worked out through our attorneys the appropriate way for us to proceed," he said.

When contacted by ZDNet Australia, security consultant Daniel Lewkovitz conceded it's an interesting thought.

"What a wonderful academic argument," he said, pointing out that "copyright would subsist in code you wrote" even if it was malicious. There is always the possibility that other, copyrighted and legitimate code can find its way into malicious binaries, but Lewkovitz doubts there'll be any problems from the authors of malicious binaries or code.

"I wait with bated breath for someone who releases malicious code to go to court on the basis of someone else infringing on their copyright," he said.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 1 comments

  1. Here we go again! A "LEGAL" system that says some low-life sending me an unsolicited email/virus/trojan is actually protected, and I have to suffer the consequences with no legal rights. Go figure, lawyers have it too easy. Anonymous -- 21/05/03

    Here we go again! A "LEGAL" system that says some low-life sending me an unsolicited email/virus/trojan is actually protected, and I have to suffer the consequences with no legal rights. Go figure, lawyers have it too easy.


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Australian Govt funds IT start-ups
    This week Australia's Federal Government announced it had allocated $3.6 million in funding to 57 local research projects so that they could be commercialised, with many of them being web or IT-related start-ups.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured