US push for biometric in Australian passports

If legislation before Congress in the United States is passed, by 2003, Australians will be required to have a biometric in their passport to enter the US, according to an Australian Customs Service representative.

The move is part of an increased focus, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, on the need to improve identification procedures at airports both in Australia and other countries.

-Before Congress at the moment there is legislation that would require all visa waiver country people that arrive to have a biometric in their passport," Fiona Fraser, director, traveller strategies, Australian Customs Service, said at the Biometrics Institute Conference & Exhibition in Sydney this week.

Australians travelling to the US for pleasure don't generally require a visa at present, Fraser explained, so it's considered a visa-waiver country. -Australians would have to have a biometric in their passport by 2003 to maintain our visa-waiver status," Fraser said.

The Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2001 -- introduced and passed in the US House of Representatives on December 19, 2001, and referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary -- section 302: -Requires a visa waiver country, in order to maintain program participation, to certify by October 26, 2003, that it has a program to issue to its nationals qualifying machine-readable passports that are tamper-proof and contain biometric identifiers."

Asked at the conference when Australians were likely to see a biometric in their passports, Fraser said: -I don't know if that legislation is going to pass." She pointed out that there appears to be two views in the US, the first being -whatever it takes security-wise" and the other being that the economics of some of these issues have to be carefully thought-out.

However, -there are certainly some big trends ahead if that legislation will be passed," she said.

Questioned about the likelihood of a worldwide standard for a passport biometric, Gail Batman, national director, passengers and IT, Australian Customs Service said: -I think it's unlikely that we're ever going to get to a stage where there is only one biometric used for passport control around the world. I think all countries that are looking at this technology need to be planning to use a range of inputs."

According to Batman, the choice a country makes about what biometric might go in its national passport won't be the only one that they can limit themselves to processing at the border. -People are going to be turning up with quite a range and we're certainly looking at it from that perspective as well," she said.

For reliability reasons, the passports office is looking at the possibility of multiple biometrics for Australian passports, Batman said.

In related news, Sydney Airport is currently trialing face recognition technologies -- the automation of face-to-passport checks using biometrics and one-to-many checks to identify people in crowds.

-Prior to September 11 our interest was solely one-to-one verification of identity," Fraser said. However, the airport will consider the use of one-to-many verification to help identify terrorists and wanted people at the border.

Requests to further question Australian Customs Service on the proposed biometric passport were denied.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 9 comments

  1. If Australians are like Canadians, who were supporting Cuban terrorism and are still supporting left-wing mass murder in Africa, then yes, the US has a valid reason to want to secure itself. Bruce Furnival -- 22/03/02

    If Australians are like Canadians, who were supporting Cuban terrorism and are still supporting left-wing mass murder in Africa, then yes, the US has a valid reason to want to secure itself.

  2. I don't believe Australians are like Canadians, in that respect at least Bruce. Anonymous -- 22/03/02

    I don't believe Australians are like Canadians, in that respect at least Bruce.

  3. Anyone against this new technology have already forgotten what happened six months ago. What's the problem, too busy to get a new passport? Imagine the obstacles this will bring upon known terrorists? Don't be stupid. Anonymous -- 25/03/02

    Anyone against this new technology have already forgotten what happened six months ago.
    What's the problem, too busy to get a new passport? Imagine the obstacles this will bring upon known terrorists?
    Don't be stupid.

  4. security paranoia No amount of security is going stop determent people (terrorists). computer systems can and will be hacked and falls identifications will be entered, complete with biometrics. It will be more difficult, but the unsavory elements are Anonymous -- 25/03/02

    security paranoia
    No amount of security is going stop determent people (terrorists). computer systems can and will be hacked and falls identifications will be entered, complete with biometrics. It will be more difficult, but the unsavory elements are getting smarter. It would be more appropiate for the USA to realise why it appears to be the wanted nation of terrorist .

  5. The USA can hardly be serious about security if it still is going to allow visa-waiver countries. They need a visa system for all countries as a minor first step, but biometric security will only stop those terrorists whose biometric details the Anonymous -- 26/03/02

    The USA can hardly be serious about security if it still is going to allow visa-waiver countries.

    They need a visa system for all countries as a minor first step, but biometric security will only stop those terrorists whose biometric details the US has, which is basically very few people.

    It won't stop Abdullah the terrorist migrating to Australia and then travelling to US with a perfectly valid Aussie passport and spreading mayhem.

    50 Terrorists could do a Tim McVeigh/oklahoma type bombing and park a truck bomb next to a building in each of the 50 states no problem so improved border security is just a teensy and insufficient step.

    Perhaps only way to be safe is to determine why the US is being attacked in the first place.
    If US policies cause some Muslims to kill themselves attacking America, the US has to weigh up whether those policies are worth the cost.

    It may well be that some Muslim zealots would continue terrorist attacks even if the US complied with all Muslim wishes - in other words, they just hate us infidels, in which case, God only knows how you stop 'em.

  6. Sad to see the last 'anonymous Australian' comment...looks like you are already biometric/bi-bigoted yourself! The solution is, as Bruce Furnival suggests, for the US to address the problem and not to keep on applying bandaids. Jack R -- 26/03/02

    Sad to see the last 'anonymous Australian' comment...looks like you are already biometric/bi-bigoted yourself! The solution is, as Bruce Furnival suggests, for the US to address the problem and not to keep on applying bandaids.

  7. So now the rest of the world has to incurr unreasonable expense to keep the over-zealous US "security" people happy? No problem - if the US adjusts its foreign policy and therefore starts putting itself and its "ALLIES!" out Anonymous -- 27/03/02

    So now the rest of the world has to incurr unreasonable expense to keep the over-zealous US "security" people happy?

    No problem - if the US adjusts its foreign policy and therefore starts putting itself and its "ALLIES!" out of risk then we will all start jumping up and down to help them.

    Isn't it enough that we have their SAC bases and send our troops to help their "war" on terrorism?

    Maybe the US will help us pay for the bio footprints on passports?

  8. This has the sounds of the ever popular 'Australia Card'. I voted for it years ago, simply because it was and is a good idea. After studying the pros and cons on Biometrics, Our Australia card would've solved alot of problems, in terms of ID. I'm one whom Wayne -- 28/03/02

    This has the sounds of the ever popular 'Australia Card'. I voted for it years ago, simply because it was and is a good idea. After studying the pros and cons on Biometrics, Our Australia card would've solved alot of problems, in terms of ID. I'm one whom is proud to be an Aussie, and would flash my "Australia Card' with a biometrics chip proudly, I've got nothing to hide, what about the rest of you? Are you hiding something? If not, go for it, just make sure the present and future Govenments don't screw it up for us overseas. Plus we don't want to become like the Americans with the attitude 'Lock myself up inside my country' syndrome. Tho I have a variety of views on biometrics, in this age, I believe we need it. And only avialable to 'Australians'.

  9. The USA has a right to determine what restrictions it wishes to impose on those wishing to enter. Other's have a choice to enter or not. If not, don't have a biometric placed in the passport. I suggest it should be left as a matter of choice for the indiv Anonymous -- 02/05/02

    The USA has a right to determine what restrictions it wishes to impose on those wishing to enter. Other's have a choice to enter or not. If not, don't have a biometric placed in the passport. I suggest it should be left as a matter of choice for the individual. A determined terrorist (whatever his denomination/ ethnic roots) will always find a way to create havoc and mayhem. A balance has to be made of public cost and convenience over absolute security. Extrapolated to the extreme is no movement in or out of the country. But you still have internal terrorists!! and a country full of prisoners.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay MyPerfect.com.au has potential
    Victorian Web start-up My Perfect has a strong story and rationale for why it will succeed. But it has to overcome some challenges and design flaws first.
  • Array Storage infrastructure on the tender track
    For a large-scale storage project, it's not uncommon to go out to tender for the best deal — but when was the last time you had to put together a tender for a document management room?
  • Array Apple has killed the video store; will ISPs be next?
    The Olympics are nearly over, and the Australian team deserves kudos for an excellent performance all around. Yet even as the Olympic sun sets on the Bird's Nest for the last time this weekend, millions of spectators around the world will be scanning their dials in the hope of finding something else to fill their viewing hours.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured