SCO lawyers promised settlement payday

Matt Hines, Special to ZDNet

07 November 2003 08:50 AM

Tags: linux, unix, sco, lawyers, hines, payday, matt

Lawyers representing SCO Group in the software maker's ongoing intellectual-property litigation could stand to benefit significantly if the company settles its pending lawsuits or is sold.

In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, SCO reported that it is finalising an agreement that would pay the law firm involved in its intellectual-property suits 20 percent of any money gained via settlements. The company's lawyers would receive the same percentage of any funds received through equity financings or a sale of the company while it has litigation pending. The agreement, first detailed in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday, also stipulates that payments to the law firm would top out at US$1 million and 400,000 shares of SCO's common stock.

Although SCO did not name its law firm in the SEC filing, its lead firm is New York's Boies Schiller & Flexner, with David Boies, best known for his role in the Microsoft federal antitrust case. Neither SCO nor the law firm could be reached for comment on the agreement.

SCO said in May that Boies' firm was paid on a contingency basis--in which attorneys are compensated with a fraction of the money won in a suit--but didn't detail the arrangement.

SCO has become the center of a large-scale controversy after suing IBM for unauthorised use of the Unix source code in Linux-based software. SCO owns some key intellectual-property rights for Unix. The SCO Group's lawsuit against IBM also targets the General Public License--the legal foundation for Linux, numerous other open-source programming projects and even for software that SCO itself still ships. However, IBM has countersued, and Linux seller Red Hat has also sued SCO in an attempt to lay the matter to rest.

Despite the ongoing debate, SCO has been able to generate interest from investors. In mid-October the company announced a US$50 million investment by BayStar. At that time, SCO said it would use the funding primarily to boost its software-development efforts and to help pay legal and licensing program costs.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 1 comments

  1. SCO has become irrelevant. SCO news has become a joke. Let's just move on. Microsoft would have to pay a lot more than US$9 million per quarter in 'licence fees' for software that it never intends to use, for this tired tale to grow any legs and run again Anonymous -- 08/11/03

    SCO has become irrelevant. SCO news has become a joke. Let's just move on. Microsoft would have to pay a lot more than US$9 million per quarter in 'licence fees' for software that it never intends to use, for this tired tale to grow any legs and run again.


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Alex Serpo Will the NSW Govt put Linux in schools?
    The NSW Government's release this week of an expressions of interest tender to give low-cost laptops to every senior public school student in NSW is a big step, but will these systems be Windows or Linux?
  • Array Naked Mac versus protected PC: What wins?
    What's easier to manage — 200 Mac OS X systems without antivirus or 200 Windows systems running a leading antivirus package?
  • Array Dear Telstra: pack up your toys, go home
    Rejecting Telstra's proposal, after all, is the only conclusion Conroy can reach: as someone whose entire philosophy is built around transparency and process, he simply cannot keep Telstra as part of the NBN bidding process anymore.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured