Australian grid computing: Creating science fact

Scratch the surface of just about any science fiction plot and you will find some combination of aliens and massively powerful computers, with which the characters interact to save or destroy the world.

This is probably why the SETI@home project run through Berkley University in the US has inspired nearly 4 million computer owners around their world to offer up some of their processing power to scanning the cosmos for signs of intelligent life.

Four years after its launch, the SETI@home software is running across no less than 127 operating systems in 226 different countries, and has managed to spew out half a billion results.

Even before the Linux-based Beowulf project kicked-off in the mid-nineties, distributed computing was allowing researches to overcome limitations in processor size. COWs (Cluster of Workstations), NOWs (Network of Workstations) and PoPCs (Piles of PCs) have seen computers linked-up and problems broken down, so as to be solved over these distributed -grid" architectures.

However, a Grid, and the Grid are different concepts altogether, according to Argonne National Labs' Grid guru Ian Foster. Whereas distributed or cluster computing pools the processing resources of a series of computers of all shapes and sizes, grid computing takes this concept one step further, allowing for detailed scheduling, high levels of service and distributed control.

"The promise of grid computing is, in the back end, you can start doing much more dynamic resource provisioning than was possible with cluster computing, and then on the front end you can make it possible to acquire resources from different locations, rather than dealing with static operations," Foster explains.

Closer to home, Rajkumar Buyya, assistant professor and lecturer at Melbourne University makes the following distinction.

"Cluster computing is about resources aggregation in a single administrative domain," he explains. "Grid computing in about resource sharing and aggregation across multiple domains."

Having recently completed a doctoral thesis outlining the economic paradigm which might underpin such a system in the commercial environment, Buyya points to the Grid's scheduling capabilities as the most crucial difference between grid and cluster computing.

"As part of the Gridbus project, We are developing the software to support a grid bank, where resources from different organisations can become part of the cooperative environment," Buyya says. "We need to design a system where deadline, budget and service level requirements can be guaranteed."

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

  1. I'd gladly donate excess processing power of 3 PCs except I'm capped on data. I think most Australian's would give excess processing time to the scientific community if they didn't have to worry about their data cap being used up in a day. Sorry, Telstra Kevin Dicker -- 12/08/02

    I'd gladly donate excess processing power of 3 PCs except I'm capped on data. I think most Australian's would give excess processing time to the scientific community if they didn't have to worry about their data cap being used up in a day. Sorry, Telstra and the lack of initiative from the Federal Government is the scientific communities greatest bane to achievment of their greatest hope.

  2. Grangenet is fine if you happen to be in the 4 cities served by it, but another case of eastern seaboard favouritism if you're not. Anonymous -- 12/08/02

    Grangenet is fine if you happen to be in the 4 cities served by it, but another case of eastern seaboard favouritism if you're not.

  3. Re: Eastern Seaboard Favouritism Bear in mind that GrangeNet was funded out of a pool of only around $40million. The Federal Government imposed a cap on any single bid of $15million. GrangeNet had to make a choice of how far one could get with o Anonymous -- 13/08/02

    Re: Eastern Seaboard Favouritism

    Bear in mind that GrangeNet was funded out of a pool of only around $40million. The Federal Government imposed a cap on any single bid of $15million. GrangeNet had to make a choice of how far one could get with only that money, based on the contributions to the consortium.

    If you look at the ANP web site (www.dcita.gov.au under BITS/ANP) you will see that another (identically funded) 10Gb/s network (CeNTIE) was funded for a Melbourne-Perth link. GrangeNet and CeNTIE are in discussions on how to connect. Hmm - DCITA have rearranged stuff on their webserver a lot, might need to search a bit

    mNet (wireless/3G) was also funded under the ANP, and that is just in Adelaide and Whyalla.

    It's Darwin and Hobart - and outside of the capitals - that have been left out at the moment. Hopefully we can solve those connectivity problems down the track (see e.g. NTN, NCF and other efforts).

    Cheers,
    Markus

  4. Count me in. Anonymous -- 14/08/02

    Count me in.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay MyPerfect.com.au has potential
    Victorian Web start-up My Perfect has a strong story and rationale for why it will succeed. But it has to overcome some challenges and design flaws first.
  • Array Storage infrastructure on the tender track
    For a large-scale storage project, it's not uncommon to go out to tender for the best deal — but when was the last time you had to put together a tender for a document management room?
  • Array Apple has killed the video store; will ISPs be next?
    The Olympics are nearly over, and the Australian team deserves kudos for an excellent performance all around. Yet even as the Olympic sun sets on the Bird's Nest for the last time this weekend, millions of spectators around the world will be scanning their dials in the hope of finding something else to fill their viewing hours.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured