Aust administrator recommends state-based domain names

auDA's New Names Advisory Panel has recommended new second level domain names based on Australia's states and territories.

The idea for geographic domain names has been around for a long time, according to Chris Disspain, CEO of the Australian domain name administrator, auDA. He told ZDNet Australia   the original names panel believed there was a need for a geographic name system, so there is a place for communities to have Web sites.

"There is perceived to be a need for it now, and they've demonstrated community acceptance of the concept, so it was slightly fast-tracked," said Disspain. The proposal being recommended was put forward by the One City One Site working party (OCOS), and is based on the concept of using geographic place names to create community portals.

The proposed second level domain names (2LDs) would be act.au, nsw.au, nt.au, qld.au, sa.au, tas.au, vic.au, and wa.au. Their use would be restricted to community Web site portals that reflect community interests, according to auDA.

The proposed domain name structure would be placename.state/territory.au, eg bathurst.nsw.au, with the site acting as a portal for the community. For example, a library could have library.bathurst.nsw.au, and an op-shop could have opshop.bathurst.nsw.au. Local businesses could also list under the community portal.

"It's a seemingly sensible thing to be doing, and it provides a good structure for geographic-based names," said Larry Bloch, CEO of registrar NetRegistry. He said it would provide another avenue for businesses to register in their local state, and therefore not clash with the names of businesses in other states.

One of the problems with the Australian domain name space is you need to be a registered business to obtain a .com.au domain name, but businesses in different states can have the same name, creating problems when it comes to creating an online entity. Bloch said the only point of difference he has with the proposal is that businesses can't register directly under the second level domain name.

"I'm not a big fan of restrictions," said Bloch. "I would have liked to see it open directly under the applicable state."

Josh Rowe, editor of whatsinaname.com.au, also thinks the proposal is well thought out. "I think it will be fantastic for the community," he said. "To date there hasn't been a second level domain that has said 'we are this community as a whole'. I think it will be a winner."

According to Disspain, another benefit of the proposal is that currently prohibited domain names will become available. For the last five years geographic domain names have been prohibited, and the only ones that exist are those that were registered before the policy came in. Once the geographic 2LD system is in place, these prohibited domain names will become available.

Disspain added that the other proposals to the panel had not been subject to a decision yet, and the community would probably have to wait until the beginning of next year before a decision was made.

auDA has asked the panel to undertake a final public consultation before submitting its final recommendation, with a deadline for comments being Tuesday November 5 2002. The system will take around 12 months after that to implement.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 2 comments

  1. Yeah Just what we need something else to make it even more confusing. Did the person who recommended this want to sell the names as well?? Anonymous -- 15/10/02

    Yeah Just what we need something else to make it even more confusing. Did the person who recommended this want to sell the names as well??

  2. Talking about what is fair on the DNS: Did you know the authorities violate Trademark and Competition Law on the Internet? They give illegal priority of one trademark over others of similar name and over lawful small businesses without a tradema Garry Anderson -- 16/10/02

    Talking about what is fair on the DNS:

    Did you know the authorities violate Trademark and Competition Law on the Internet? They give illegal priority of one trademark over others of similar name and over lawful small businesses without a trademark.

    Virtually every word is trademarked, be it Alpha to Omega or Aardvark to Zulu, most many times over. MOST share the same words or initials with MANY others in a different business and/or country. For example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) shares its initials with five trademarks - in the U.S. alone (please check uspto.gov). This could be any acronym or initialism - including the famous International Trade Centre (ITC) or International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    You can legally use any word, words or initials to start a new business without registering a trademark - providing you are not passing off, of course. Take for example the word 'apple'. It is legally used by thousands of businesses - large and small all over the world. Indeed, it is impossible that they all register themselves as trademarks - they are bound to conflict with many others, being confusingly similar. In my local phone book alone, there are at least five using this word - two garages (seems not connected), a car centre, fruit growers and a decorating firm. Also what about personal sites?

    The authorities hide the simple solution to this conflict - I believe them corrupt. Why? For a start, trademark holders do not own the vast majority of domains - it is obvious that something is needed to replace the registered trademark symbol - a new TLD of .reg would do that. This is for the same reasons, primarily to advise people that the mark is legally registered and protected by law. It is indisputable fact that the answer to domain and trademark problems was self-evident and is easier to use than the telephone. Honest lawyers have ratified the solution.

    To see major findings please visit WIPO.org.uk - not associated with UN WIPO.org. Although I use the initials WIPO, it is obvious (even to the 'crooks' in UN WIPO) that this site not associated with them.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Alex Serpo Will the NSW Govt put Linux in schools?
    The NSW Government's release this week of an expressions of interest tender to give low-cost laptops to every senior public school student in NSW is a big step, but will these systems be Windows or Linux?
  • Array Naked Mac versus protected PC: What wins?
    What's easier to manage — 200 Mac OS X systems without antivirus or 200 Windows systems running a leading antivirus package?
  • Array Dear Telstra: pack up your toys, go home
    Rejecting Telstra's proposal, after all, is the only conclusion Conroy can reach: as someone whose entire philosophy is built around transparency and process, he simply cannot keep Telstra as part of the NBN bidding process anymore.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured