Windows Web sites outgrow Linux

Microsoft has seen a 300 percent increase in the last three months of the number of Web sites hosted on its recently launched Windows Server 2003 software--with a considerable amount of the new business representing migrations from Linux, according to a survey published this week.

The figures are a win for Microsoft, which dominates the desktop operating system market but currently rates a distant second to the open-source Apache, often running on Linux, in servers. Open-source software is not controlled by any one organization, and can often be obtained and maintained far more cheaply than proprietary software.

The number of active Web sites hosted on Server 2003 tripled to 88,400 in the three months since launch, according to Netcraft, which monitors server usage. A significant portion of this growth has been at the expense of the Linux operating system, with 5 percent, or 8,000 sites, having migrated from Linux.

"Microsoft will take some considerable encouragement at the number of sites that have switched from Linux," Netcraft said in its report.

But the 88,400 versions of Windows Server 2003 account for only a very small fraction of the total market. There are 4.7 million active sites that use Microsoft's Web server, Netcraft said. Apache, which most often runs on Linux or various versions of Unix, is used at 13.2 million active Web sites.

Forty-two percent of the sites running on Microsoft's new server are new sites, 43 percent are upgrades from other Windows platforms, mainly Windows 2000, and one percent are migrations from operating systems other than Linux or Windows, according to Netcraft.

The company also noted that the number of sites running on the BSD version of Unix have continued to increase--the only operating system besides Linux and Windows that the survey has found to be on the rise, rather than losing market share, in the server space.

The number of hostnames using BSD is nearing four million, while the number of active sites is nearly two million, Netcraft said. Most of these sites are accounted for by companies with shared hosting systems, including Yahoo, which can operate hundreds of thousands of sites as part of a single system. Yahoo accounts for 159,354 of the BSD sites, with 152,054 from NTT/Verio and 129,378 from Infospace, the survey found.

"Never has an operating system used by so many been administered by so few," Netcraft's report said.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    Totally misleading headline! L ...Con Zymaris -- 21/07/03

    Totally misleading headline!

    Let's look at the facts from:

    http://news.netcraft.com/

    Firstly, we note that 42 MILLION websites
    are tracked.

    Secondly, we notice that only 5% of the 88,000
    new Win2k3 sites are actually migrations from
    Linux, which consitutes a migration of only
    0.019% of the whole web's sites.

    Thirdly, from:

    http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/07/02/july_2003_web_server_survey.html

    you will notice that yet again, Windows, taken as an overall figure, lost even more ground to Linux/BSD/Apache this month. The
    Open Source platforms increased by 0.56% (a 20-fold increase over the Win2k migrations
    from Linux!) and that Microsoft platforms
    _fell_ by 0.90%, or a loss of over 15,000
    sites. Microsoft keeps losing ground every
    month, and now only has around 1/4 of the
    web's sites, whereas Open Source has 2/3rds.

    Thanks for your time.

    Spot on, Con. Netcraft also p ...Anonymous -- 21/07/03

    Spot on, Con. Netcraft also point out that the largest Windows 2003 hosting site has migrated all their customers to Windows 2003, accounting for a considerable number of the "Linux defectors".

    You might also notice that Netcraft erred in calling 8,000 5% of 88,000. It is actually 9%. How can you believe such sloppy reporting at all?

    ZDNET, you idiots. Such an unp ...Anonymous -- 21/07/03

    ZDNET, you idiots.

    Such an unprofessional approach to journalism.

    Was this paid for by Microsoft ...Anonymous -- 21/07/03

    Was this paid for by Microsoft??

    Quoting the article:

    "with 5 percent, or 8,000 sites, having migrated from Linux."

    "Forty-two percent of the sites running on Microsoft's new server are new sites, 43 percent are upgrades from other Windows platforms, mainly Windows 2000, and one percent are migrations from operating systems other than Linux or Windows,"

    Lets see.... 5 + 42 + 43 + 1 = 91%.
    What happened to the other 9%????

    A very dodgy report which at best is unreliable.

    The Microsoft School of Journa ...Anonymous -- 25/07/03

    The Microsoft School of Journalism Counts Proud New Graduate Writing for ZDNet!

    That really is an illiterate, innumerate piece of nonsense you've just published (hopefully unwittingly).

    Let's see.

    The product launched three months ago and its market share has tripled, has it? I count an increase from zero, before its launch, to 88,000, as being a far more impressive increase than mere tripling! Notify Microsoft that they're seeing an infinite rate of increase in the take up of their product!

    Other figures given in the article tell us that Open Source has roughly three times as many servers running on the web as has Microsoft. Now, when we're also told that of the sales of the newly launched product less than 10% represented migrations from Linux (when a naive expectation given the three to one Linux/Windows market share ratio pre-existing might have been roughly "well, probably less than 25%!") - we can only gape open mouthed at the talent that has produced this article and headline.

    Awesome.

    In reality, the data given in the article confirm that Open Source and Linux continue to trounce Microsoft in this sector, with the gap widening markedly.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured