Windows 7 gets mixed reviews

As developers received their copies of Windows 7 on Tuesday in the US, they offered varied reactions to the Microsoft operating system update.

Attendees of PDC 2008 received this
160GB Western Digital portable hard
drive and a pre-beta copy of Windows 7

(Credit: )

Windows 7 arrived in various forms at Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles. Windows vice president Steven Sinofsky showed its key features on stage, the OS appeared on PCs throughout the convention centre, and developers also received copies to take home.

Attendees at PDC 2008 received pre-beta copies of Windows 7 on DVD, as well as a 160GB Western Digital portable hard drive packed with code.

In addition to the Ultimate Edition of Windows 7, the hard drive came with the following additions:

  • .NET Micro Framework development kit 3.0
  • Azure Services Training Kit, a set of hands-on labs, presentations, and samples
  • Live Framework SDK, documentation, samples and tools to build on top of Microsoft's Live Services
  • Software Development Kit for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (pre-beta)
  • Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio 2008 Express Edition
  • Visual Studio 2010 & .NET Framework 4.0 CTP
  • Windows Azure software development kit

During the keynote on Tuesday, all the PCs around the convention centre for attendees to use for checking email were switched to Windows 7. Not everyone appeared to notice the change: one attendee, for example, said he didn't notice that it was Windows 7 until a reporter started taking pictures of the screen.

Some attendees took the opportunity to try out the new Windows 7 operating system in hands-on labs in the main hall of the event. The reviews were mixed.

"It needs some work as far as usability is concerned," said Matthew Firth, chief technology officer of online pet pharmacy PetCareRX, as he tried to move an image across a touchscreen with his hand. "The controls could be more intuitive. I guess there's a learning curve associated with it. If they can get it right, it could be just as revolutionary as the mouse was."

Falling touchscreen prices and the eventual adoption of Windows 7 will mean Firth will have to optimise his company's website for touch, he said.

In the meantime, Firth said he's thinking of getting a touchscreen monitor and Windows 7 for his children to use at home. "They like to paint. It's less messy and my son won't eat the crayons," he said.

Allan Thraen, a software developer for Swedish content management firm EPIServer, said the touch capability was "totally cool" but complained that the operating system overall seemed "still a bit buggy; not totally smooth".

He and others added that the Windows 7 user interface was too similar to Vista.

"It looks like a re-packaged Vista [with] a little bit of eye candy," said Daniel McGloin, a software engineer at Intuit.

Keeping the underlying code similar means fewer incompatibility issues with applications and drivers, but McGloin added: "Is it compelling to the end user? I don't know."

Other users saw Microsoft's decision to keep many things the same as a good decision. "This is what Vista should have been," was a response heard several times on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Talkback 19 comments

    Do ZDNet and CNet actually have any clue? Anonymous -- 30/10/08

    I mean for god sake it is a pre-beta preview of Windows 7 without significant elements of the UI (they have been left out for now) and all of those details such as UI elements left out, work still being done on the performance etc have been specifically called out by Microsoft prior to giving it out.

    What the hell does the CNet writer expect from a PRE-BETA OS for god sake!

    Please get a clue and if you are going to create disingenous headlines like "mixed reviews" back it up with facts. The majority of people I spoke to at PDC and the forums and websites I have been reading have been overwhelmingly positive about Windows 7.

    Get a clue ZDNet and CNet your anti Microsoft bias is showing through loud and clear and it is getting very tiresome.

    no kidding Anonymous -- 31/10/08 (in reply to #320115240)

    Everytime Ubuntu updates ZDNet practically wets themselves and writes about how everything about it is perfect.

    Enjoy being a bunch of biased, linux zealots ZDNet.

    wake up! Anonymous -- 05/11/08 (in reply to #320115266)

    wake up mate! Ubuntu is much better... I switched from XP and Vista to Ubuntu last year....and ever since never looked back...better performance, better service, and free....what else u need?

    lame duck Anonymous -- 30/10/08

    Expect it to be bad, this has been the trend for years and we all know it will be. XP will be the last desktop success for a lame duck company.

    Lame Duck Anonymous -- 31/10/08 (in reply to #320115243)

    Its all good. XP was almost 7 years ago. The platform has moved on but perhaps you have not. 'm not sure about Lame Duck - have you seen the stuff coming out the labs?! See for example Second Light which goes into the world of sci fi

    yeah Anonymous -- 31/10/08 (in reply to #320115258)

    Exactly, with XP after 7 years and all the lesson's life has thrown Microsoft , and with all the resources they have they STILL can't do it right. One needs to ask the question, are they engineering their software in this manner for a reason? A reason to upgrade perhaps, a reason for third party software you MUST have to feel secure, and get people to spend more money on upgrades?
    You are right, I have not moved on at all with Windows or microsoft. Long ago I moved up to another OS. :-)

    let me guess Anonymous -- 31/10/08 (in reply to #320115267)

    You moved onto Linux, right?

    Linux users act like they use the holy grail of Operating systems. Well, enjoy using something that is only useful in a server environment, a clunky, poorly coded GUI (there are two main ones available and neither one are any good) and no design applications worth talking about.

    If you switched to Apple I pity you even more.

    Switch Anonymous -- 31/10/08 (in reply to #320115274)

    It is funny how windows users know they are compromising :-)

    compromise Matt -- 07/11/08 (in reply to #320115282)

    I suppose installing WINE or VMWare to run basically every major PC game in existance isnt compromise? lol.

    Linux IS viable alternative on desktop Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 03/11/08 (in reply to #320115274)

    It is appropriate to compare Linux distros like Ubuntu to Vista and Win7, as that IS the competition. And yes M$ has decisively lost the server market to Linux... but that does not make Linux ONLY a server-suitable operating system.
    For the desktop, Ubuntu installs far more easily than any M$ OS, is far more robust, far less viral, never allowed to get so out-of-date you HAVE to upgrade etc... and it is all FREE.
    The proof that Ubuntu etc is a serious competitor is the fact that M$ is going to such lengths to give away as many versions of Vista as possible, and bringing forward early-releases of Win7... trying to hold back the tide!
    And yes I have worked primarily on M$ operating systems since PCDOS v1.0 in 1981 till I 'upgraded' from WinXP to Ubuntu six months ago.

    Switched to Apple Anonymous -- 07/11/08 (in reply to #320115274)

    Using a new MAC Book with VMWare and Windows XP. Very happy, very fast, very easy, very stable, very compatible.

    Oh Dear Anonymous -- 07/11/08

    Another pathetic shot at Microsoft by ZDNet. Grow up folks. I've gotta laugh at the linux fanboys too. I've been hearing that it will be "The year of Linux on the desktop' since 1998 (ish) ... I'm still waiting... Don't let reality intrude you silly people!

    Desktop Linux Anonymous -- 07/11/08 (in reply to #320115771)

    Its out there but little boys can't play windows games on it. Oh well.
    Its free, honest and security engineered. Windows is not. You make your choice - red pill or blue?

    Bwohahhhhhaahahaha Anonymous -- 13/11/08 (in reply to #320115775)

    Security engineered? You MUST be joking!! Now that IS funny!

    M$ Pimps & Prostitutes John -- 11/11/08

    Why is it that 99% of MS windows operators that bag other OS's have never tried them,
    To give a educated opinion?
    I think ZDNet & CNet give a very un biased review and considering they have been in the past and im not sure now been sponsored by M$ along with alot of other software companies
    and still do a very good job of IT News.

    Windows Still Dominats Neuraxis -- 19/11/08

    Having been using OS's since DOS days I have switch to Linux a few times I have it running on my laptop. Windows has its problems but Linux is still a long way off dominating windows. Sure its GUI is getting better but it�s still not the same. Being a gamer I find Linux a pointless OS for business I can see that it would be viable.

    Vista isn't a bad OS I doubt many if the people who complain about it have even used it. Pre-SP1 is had some issue but since SP1 I have been running the 64bit version and haven't had an issue since in fact I find is much better then XP which I still have to use at work.

    Come on you lot.....seriously................take a pill! Anonymous -- 21/11/08

    Try and be a little constructive would you. Some of us use and like both platforms you know.

    Better than what exactly? Anonymous -- 14/01/09

    I use Xubuntu on an ancient laptop, xppro on on desktop and xp64 pro on my work horse. I have a macbook pro for doing music because you cannot beat a mac for sound software.

    I dont understand why there are OS loyalists at all, each has its purpose and strengths. Macs cost a tonne, but any idiot can use one, linux is free and fast but in order to do anything you should know a little more than your average M$ user. M$ is fine too, as long as you stay clear of the bloated Vista OS's, Windows 7 could only improve on Vista, it wouldn't be possible to make Vista any worse.

    Win7beta: just test it... Anonymous -- 15/01/09

    I test everything I can get downloaded, and use M$ and Linux in multiboot pc's. The only left reason to use M$ is that I can't find an affordable scanner running under some Linux OS.
    Yesterday I tested Win7 (or is it WinXPsp7?) for a full 177 minutes and then I erased it. A simple VLC works as a crippled child under it, while VLC runs on every OS that I know: the sound is continuously interrupted by hickups. Think I'm a dumb person not knowing how to install something? Well, not 7 minutes later, I had AntiX8 running, ánd VLC with a smooth stream of loungy music, as it should be - I think.
    My conclusion: M$ has the right to improve their products, and I will try them. But I have the right to find out that some free software is performing just as well as working horse, or even outperforms this rather expensive "new" OS.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured