VMware: Microsoft has 'no car'

Microsoft's virtualisation offering was like tyres without a car, according to Paul Harapin, VMware's Asia Pacific vice president, who today said his company's future direction would put it in increasing conflict with Redmond.

"What Microsoft has announced is a hypervisor. They have announced tyres, the wheels of a car. They have no car. There is no engine, there is no seat. Just tyres," Harapin said in an interview today, explaining his metaphor by saying VMware's offering contained not just a hypervisor but a whole lot of surrounding parts of the virtualisation puzzle.

VMware AP vice president Paul Harapin.
(Credit: VMWare)

When asked about Microsoft's ability to compete in the virtualisation space, Harapin continued with the machine metaphors: "It's like a skateboard manufacturer saying we're a transport provider," he opined.

Harapin said that Microsoft was years behind VMware in the virtualisation market. "The basic premise is they have a long way to go. They have come out recently and said that they agree with our strategy ... and that they will deliver some of that functionality some time in 2010," he said.

One area Harapin said would put VMware in increasing competition with Microsoft was the ability of third-party software providers to develop operating system-independent virtual applications.

"The software community is now developing their technology as virtual appliances. So you can go to Symantec, and say, 'I want your email-monitoring server', and they will provide you with a virtual appliance with their own operating system," he said.

There were incentives for developers to do this, said Harapin. "The value proposition for software developers is very strong, because they don't have to develop their product to run on all the different OSes," he said.

However, this provided a challenge to Microsoft.

"That's obviously an issue for Microsoft because they get a lot of their business from the OS. So if the software community starts providing their software as pre-installed packages with a very thin layer of open source OS to run their app ... there are concerns there."

According to Harapin this trend was going to continue. "There are over a thousand products that are being distributed this way. Vendors like the whole IBM software suite, SAP. The nature of the operating system is changing dramatically," he said.

Talkback 5 comments

    Got to agree with that Anonymous -- 15/10/08

    Microsoft are not good at anything, they are just popular because they are the default setting with people who don't know better.

    What color is the sky down there? Anonymous -- 15/10/08

    So let me get this right ... all $1.2 billion of VMware makes a car compared to the $11 billion of Microsoft's server and tools business (to keep things simple I'm excluding the Office, Vista and Dynamics business)? And is Mr. Harapin not familiar with Worley Parsons and Telstra Business Systems of Australia, who've adopted Microsoft's server virtualization and systems management software? Or Australian accounting firm GMK Centric that runs Microsoft's SoftGrid app virtualization software?

    VMware offers no management tools for non-virtualized systems, and no tools to operate apps. So without a complete set of management tools, are they selling a car without an instrument panel?

    Careful you don't drown in that MS cool-aid..... Anonymous -- 17/10/08 (in reply to #320114251)

    The big difference is that VMware has a clear strategy around virtualisation. They, rightly, see it as a central technology to enable real transformation of datacenters and provide a full suite of tools to enable that transformation. VMotion, DRS and HA are available right now, and even more features such as fully fault tolerent virtual machines are just around the corner.
    The MS offering, while providing an admittedly effective hypervisor, does not provide anything other than the ability to perform basic consolidation.
    While this may be fine for SMBs, enterprises have gone far beyond simple consolidation and are now looking for features around disastaster recovery, business continuity/uptime and computing resources on demand.
    While I have no dount that MS will get there eventually (they nearly always do), Hyper-V is not ready for prime time just yet.

    Smell that? Anonymous -- 17/10/08

    That's fear folks, raw fear. These guys are getting desperate.

    VMWare are like a car without a car... wonder woman anyone? Hype-asaurus -- 24/02/09

    What a silly article and I think the VP looks like a guy I bought a car from once :P

    VMware couldnt make a good OS, dont make any business application, and dont help out the environment when you look at the big picture of Data Centers etc - the big guys now have Virtualisation strategies and products so this niche players days are numbered. They dont even make the best Virtualisation products

    Else they would sit back and count there money instead of publicly trying to run competitors into the ground. Seems to me that they have no sustainable competitive advantage and will go the way of every other point solution - acquired or doomed...

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured