US government dept bans Vista

The United States Department of Transportation (DOT) has banned its users from installing Microsoft's new Windows Vista, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7 software packages, saying there was no business or technical justification for the upgrades.

"Based on our initial analysis (from internal recommendations and analysis performed by Gartner Group), there appears to be no compelling technical or business case for upgrading to these new Microsoft software products," the department's chief information officer Daniel Mintz wrote in a memorandum dated 19 January, 2007.

The CIO added there were specific reasons not to upgrade to the new software. These included the cost of the move (including hardware/software costs and labour), as well as compatibility concerns between Office 2007 and previous versions, primarily revolving around Microsoft Word.

Also, Mintz noted available funding was limited, and IT staff had already committed their time to the pending move of DOT's headquarters to a new building.

Mintz will issue a follow-up memorandum within 180 days from 19 January that would articulate his department's strategic desktop and laptop technology roadmap.

DOT is a large department within the US government responsible for the country's transportation networks, including railway, aviation, road and maritime transport. It has around 55,000 staff.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

  1. Finally Anonymous -- 08/03/07

    This is good news. There is no reason anyone's hard earned tax dollars should be spent on Vista or buy the 'privilege' to be controlled. This goes for business too.

    1. Buy what privileges? Anonymous -- 08/03/07

      The article reports a commitment to refrain from an upgrade to IE7 from the browser they are using, just as much as it reports a commitment to refraining from upgrading Windows. What privilege to be controlled can be bought by downloading freeware?

      Also, what taxpayer's money is spent by businesses that upgrade to either product?

      I would suggest that there would be a justifiable business case for any user of a five year old operating system to commit to an upgrade. Finding the money is an important but seperate issue. Security would be the first and foremost good reason for upgrading - even if businesses shunned pretty things like Aero and upgraded for security reasons alone there would be an improvement.

      What is the alternative? I can't think of one.

    2. Fair enough, but Anonymous -- 08/03/07

      When you can't drive down your street because your car no longer runs on the road, there is a compelling case to upgrade. This is simply not the case and will not be for some time.
      If your council upgraded your road and did not allow you to drive on it with your car, you would not be very happy with that, would you. Hello Microsoft. People simply will not put up with that anymore.
      For business users, there is no reason to spend money on this unless of course you can justify the cost and the disruption to the business by doing so. The 'minor' benefits vista offers in the security department are well and truely covered elsewhere within infrastrucure - and by far a more superior standard. Sticking iwth XP will not hurt at all, or there is a Linux or Mac alternative with a far better record at protecting the user.

  2. Misleading headline Anonymous -- 08/03/07

    Since when did an "indefinite moratorium" become a ban. This is just a sensible piece of thinking from a CIO who obviously wants proper time to evaluate such a move and what impact it would have. Hence the reason why he said he will make a further annoucement in 120 days. He doesnt mention the cost of licensing for Vista and Office as an organisation of that size would probably have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft that would cover new versions. Perhaps what we should be asking is if they do not want to take advantage of new versions why are they paying for upgrade rights.

    1. Wording Charles G. -- 09/03/07

      I don't think the wording of this story makes sense. It makes it sound like staff are responsible for installing applications on their own PCs. I certainly hope that a fleet of over 50000 machines is centrally managed!

      Mind you, it is true - there isn't really a technical reason to perform the upgrade - just more bloat.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Video | Optus CIO Lawrie Turner

In this exclusive video interview, Optus chief information officer Lawrie Turner speaks to ZDNet.com.au about being the IT head for Australia's number two telco.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Telstra's BT coat doesn't fit
    The vision of the future BT portrayed this week at an Australian conference was so far removed from how Telstra's David Quilty has described the British telco that I wonder if they were talking about the same UK.
  • Array Australian security: the lucky country
    Does anyone seriously believe that Australian businesses and government agencies manage security any better than the US or UK?
  • Array Storage infrastructure on the tender track
    For a large-scale storage project, it's not uncommon to go out to tender for the best deal — but when was the last time you had to put together a tender for a document management room?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured