US Department of Defense bans YouTube and MySpace

The US Department of Defense issued a memo last week that states it intended to begin blocking network access -- including that of soldiers serving overseas -- to several popular "Internet entertainment sites" from yesterday.

The 12 sites to be blocked, according to a story in the Associated Press, include several large social networking and media sharing sites like MySpace, YouTube, MTV, Pandora, and Photobucket.

Earlier this month, the US Army cracked down on soldiers' personal blogs, citing security concerns. Operational security, according to the memo from the DoD that was cited in Monday's AP article, is also a reason behind the new ban on MySpace, YouTube, and other social media sites. But that's not all -- "recreational traffic," the memo said, is a drain on bandwidth.

DoD network operations, the memo said, "(have) noted a significant increase in use of DoD network resources tied up by individuals visiting certain recreational Internet sites".

However, according to the AP article, some critics of the policy said that social media sites were an importantant way of keeping in touch with families and friends as well as a news source.

"This is as much an information war as it is bombs and bullets," Wired defense blogger Noah Shachtman is quoted as saying. "And they are muzzling their best voices."

Advertisement

Talkback 11 comments

    this sucksAnonymous -- 15/05/07

    the department of defense can suck dick for all I care. I''l find a way around it because there's no way im going to live without youtube.

    This sucksAnonymous -- 15/05/07 (in reply to #320079387)

    Anonymous, that wouldf be right !
    You come across to me as a number one 'Drongo' why don't you seek some help, you are a twisted ****wit.

    BIG BROTHERAnonymous -- 15/05/07

    Man I knew this would happen.
    People power is on it's way. I can't wait till the Chinese people break through also.
    More knowledge is scary for the War Proffitiers.

    They'll stop itAnonymous -- 15/05/07

    I figure they'll just stuff socks in all the internet tubes leaving the region where the GI's are stationed.

    Not Big BrotherAnonymous -- 15/05/07

    Funny, when your corporate admin blocks something, it's not called 'censorship'- it's called policy.

    Same applies to the DoD. When you sign the enlistment forms and complete your training, you agree to sacrifice certain rights as a citizen. Nobody focres an individual into the armed forces, which makes the enlistment forms just like any other contract: read carefully before you sign.

    Personally, were I deployed in combat zone, I would 100% bandwidth supporting the the operation, not my fetish for Star Wars Kid or Jessica Alba n*pple shots.
    -Tarkin000

    AgreeAnonymous -- 15/05/07 (in reply to #320079399)

    You hit it dead on. I really am getting tired of every blasting everything the government does; crying "oppression" and "conspiracy".
    Everyone also cries how wasteful the government is (especially the DoD) - this time they are trying to make some practical decision based on business sense - let%u2019s cut costs and stop our competitor from getting info.

    Our TroopsJames C. Rugur -- 15/05/07

    The troops should have the rights to access the internet writting home and to their girlsfriends or boyfriends even if it means using youtube or other places. Our goverment lies to our troops and lies to us. I still am not getting any answers as to How did Iraq get into this war without proof of weapons of mass disdruction? or Why are we fighting them since 911 that had nothing to do with Iraq? and where is Ben Linn?

    crapAnonymous -- 15/05/07

    this is non-sense... US defense is wierd! prolly those are the poeple who doesn't have friends in myspace and no one visits their youtube profile! hahahaha! mofos!

    brainwashing requires isolationdonut comeback -- 15/05/07

    any possibility of the truth is a threat to pushing war on ignorant masses of volunteers. remember, every one of them volunteered to give up thier lives and rights for a tank of gas, er, political lies, er, greed of criminals in power, er, whatever. keep those earplugs in too. hahahahha

    Blocked sitesAnonymous -- 15/05/07

    We do the same thing at work, and we plan to block more. People do not understand that without the technology our forces are very crippled. If one of them picks up a virus or something similar, something classified as a Zero Day threat, it could cause serious problems. I agree that they should be free to use the internet to keep in touch with family and friends, but they should not be posting information concerning troop movements or gun battles.

    If we can do it as corporate policy, or in an effort to be compliant with different standards (HIPPA, PCI, etc...) to protect credit card info or health records, then how much more should we do it to protect our troop movements, tactical info, etc...?

    ****in DODAnonymous -- 18/06/07

    Yippy, just what I need to contact my wife, only shitty yahoo mail and us.army.mil, thanks DOD!

    I cant wait until they block yahoo because its a security issue as well, then I wont have no contact at all with my family while im overseas. Its hard enough to get R&R leave as it is, just to see my wife for **** weeks, and then the rest of my miserable 5 out of 15 months I stay here waiting in a 25 person line just to talk to my wife on the shitty OPSEC phones overseas.
    These **** politicians dont know anything at all but banning this and that and taking away freedom us soldiers have, again thank you DOD, I hope you all die painfully and slowly.

    Sorry, but being online now is very rare, Im just glad they didnt ban this site as "Tasteless" or "Speaking your mind" since Im sure in a manner of months theyll do anyway, but Im just glad I can still check my yahoo mail when I can.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Datacentre disaster lessons
    As a system administrator, the health and status of your datacentre is at the forefront of your mind. But how often do you think about the needs beyond server status and bandwidth?
  • Array E-health too unsexy for COAG
    There will always be something more politically sexy than e-health for state governments, meaning the National E-Health Transition Authority's business case for a national electronic medical record might just sit on the shelf gathering dust forever.
  • Array TelstraUnClear
    Telstra's New Zealand arm TelstraClear is one strange company ...
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured