Tattersalls dumps Linux 'complexity' for Microsoft

Gaming giant Tattersalls has decided to dump four Linux operating systems in favour of a Microsoft counterpart across its Maxgaming business.

Maxgaming currently uses four separate platforms for its gaming products and intends on consolidating these into a single Microsoft platform over the next six years, according to a newspaper report.

The project is expected to cost AU$43 million, of which AU$30.7 million will be spent on new hardware for its operations in NSW, Queensland and the Northern Territory, The Australian said.

Chief information officer Stephen Lawrie said a labyrinth of software licenses resulting from recent mergers made it impractical to retain any of its multiple Linux-based platforms. He said the company chose Windows to streamline gaming product development.

"Realistically we needed a platform where we could deploy things consistently across the whole marketplace. The way systems are [currently] we can't take a product which we might have in Queensland and deploy it in Sydney easily," said Lawrie.

Michael Warrilow, analyst at research company Hydrasight, said a major benefit from a gaming development perspective is the larger supply of Microsoft developers compared to Linux.

However, he said the argument for standardising on a single platform can also be applied to Linux, with a number of major retailers already looking at Unix and Linux-based platforms on which to develop proprietary software.

Warrilow said he is aware of at least one major Australian retailer using the Linux-based Retailix platform.

"They are also intending to use this solution across multiple retail brands so the 'one platform' argument that Tattersalls are using can also be applied the other way. That is, a single platform of Linux point-of-sale devices versus single platform of Windows gaming machines," he told ZDNet Australia.

Warrilow added that it would be interesting if Tattersalls decided to deploy technology used in Microsoft's Surface -- a 30 inch table top display that allows users to manipulate data without the use of a mouse or other controls.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    complexity??? Anonymous -- 05/09/07

    We shall see how it goes. Sounds more like to me that they think MS will shine the light for them to get them out of a dark place. I can't help but laugh at that.

    reducing "complexity" by deploying Windows Karl Haversham -- 06/09/07

    They obviously haven't burnt their fingers enough using Windows.

    When confronted with a major technical problem in Unix/Linux you can always find ways around the problem, so the end your IT-department / users still get what you want them to get.

    ... where as in Windows: YOU JUST HIT A WALL.

    I am speaking from experience and have been troubleshooting Windows problems for over a decade.

    No sweat, Tattersalls, count on having fun!

    To Linux or not to Linux? John Milites -- 06/09/07

    Interesting to see that they had four different versions of GNU/Linux ... who was the IT genius who picked that course of action?

    One system with modified deployments of said system for different uses, ie Debian Desktop, Debian Server, Debian-based POS etc etc etc would have been far more optimal.

    Clearly the IT Managers didn't understand how to really use one operating systems across a range of required functionalities, and so they chose to buy various Linux solutions from disparate service providers.

    Given that a Debian Server can run Virtualisation software that can run Windows products if required, I don't see why they would think they need to change back to "that operating system".

    Methinks it may be about time some hardcore Debian Sysadmins got some of the jobs that the MCSE-brigade have been pilfering for years.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured