NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

Sick NSW Health IT prescribed $700m

NSW special commissioner Peter Garling has prescribed an aggressive $704 million investment strategy to cure NSW Health's sick information technology systems, in a landmark review published late yesterday.

Whilst much of the work undertaken in NSW public hospitals is "high tech", its record-keeping system is a relic of the pre-computer age.

Peter Garling

"What currently exists is a largely paper-based system with significant variation from clinician to clinician, ward to ward and hospital to hospital," Garling said in his comprehensive three-volume report on NSW's health system released yesterday.

"Whilst much of the work undertaken in NSW public hospitals is "high tech", its record-keeping system is a relic of the pre-computer age," he said. NSW Health's IT operations are in general led by departmental chief information officer Mike Rillstone, although each area health service also has its own CIO.

The commissioner has recommended a "one-off injection" of $704 million to remedy a system that had been bogged down not just by paper, inconsistent documentation and illegible handwriting, but also substandard hardware, incompatible software and inadequate broadband connectivity.

"In my view, insufficient funds are allocated to information technology to get it up to the standard needed in an acceptable timeframe," Garling said.

"Far more aggressive targets are necessary and must be set than those currently in place," he said.

The proposed four-year investment strategy, on top of the $315.5 million already planned, which he hopes will be rolled out by 2016, includes amongst other things an additional $144 million for a statewide rollout of an e-health record system; $155 million to boost network connectivity; $85 million on an automated rostering system; and $112 million on a medication management system.

Garling highlighted the cost of poor technology to patients' health. Following the analysis of one patient's brain injury, it was found that staff failed to monitor the patient's sodium levels. Garling said this was likely avoidable if the hospital had consistent documentation practices.

"The entry of the sodium results in the notes was not immediately obvious," Garling noted.

Dr McGlynn, who was interviewed by Garling for the inquiry, had said that the most commonly reported incidents at his hospital were prescription mistakes, because staff often failed to relate the patient's weight and age to the dosage.

Far more aggressive targets are necessary and must be set than those currently in place

Peter Garling

NSW Health's configuration of the CERNER electronic medical record system, currently being implemented, also came under fire. NSW Health said it could not afford to include a "to do" list within the system and said that automated warnings to flag a patient's changed status during treatment wasn't necessary.

"In my view, medical alerts can play an important role in ensuring that optimal patient care is delivered," Garling said, however added that they should not be overused.

The National E-Health Transition Authority's (NEHTA) submission to the inquiry for clinicians highlighted that paper-based clinical reporting systems were not suited to current acute health care procedures, which often required a patient to move between several specialist facilities for treatment. NEHTA is the nation's peak e-health body.

Echoing a view by some clinicians, Garling brushed aside privacy concerns associated with implementing a state-wide electronic record system and has recommended one that can be "readily accessed by all health professionals". He noted that banks had overcome privacy obstacles similar to those faced in health care.

"Many privacy concerns are raised in the health sector which prove, on closer examination, to be based on unnecessary fears. Unwarranted privacy concerns may become an obstacle to much-needed reform," he said.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    Health IT woes Anonymous -- 28/11/08

    We've see it all before, heard it too. Accenture tried it...so did many others. But until we have a BB network of in excess of 100mbps, its not going to happen. Heck they can't even implement one in one hospital! $700m!! not a chance. That sort of money buys lots of nurses and doctors at better pay rates on more reasonable shifts. Which is the real issue.

    Bonuses Anonymous -- 29/11/08

    After working in the Public HealthCare Sector I note one major difference from any of my private sector jobs...

    Public service does not encourage the delivery of timely or operationally effective solutions by linking successful outcomes to bonuses or remuneration. Embedded in some areas in the public sector (health being one of the worst) is the resistance to change as there is no reward for finishing the job, more money and more time is always available. Perhaps doing what the private sector does in applying real penalties and desirable bonuses as opposed to ongoing fees to contractors. consultants and employees will get a different result. Performance based remuneration/ encouragement is somewhat of a foreign concept in some departments.

    Break the back of that, hire more clinical support staff than IT/Admin staff and put some of the money into buying simple consumables for clinicians and patients rather than nice chairs for the admin staff in capital cities would also be another nice way of providing a real impact on the Health sector.

    The business is supposed to be about treating people not providing an alternative to getting a real job or being on the dole.

    tail wagging the dog Anonymous -- 30/11/08

    Unfortunately, the HealthIT systems that I've been exposed to so far all share some characteristics:
    - they take the clinician away from the patient
    - they are time-consuming to access/use [compounded by inadequate access to PCs]
    - they don't have the flexibility of hand-written free-text to cater for individual idiosyncrasies
    - they benefit the organisation/bureaucracy more than they benefit the patient or clinicians
    - they are not integrated with one another
    - while their capacity to store & organise information terrific, for the most part they are yet to deliver tangible benefits to patients or clinicians

    Perhaps we need to be careful about what we wish for. People generally, especially those with complex health care needs, don't necessarily want to be pushed through a production line with one-size-fits-all approaches to care and documentation. As it stands, a blank page allows the clinician to be client-focused in their documentation more effectively than any of the applications I've seen. When it's your turn to be the patient, do you want your care to be reduced to a set of drop-down menus, check boxes & codes?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured