Should you set your sights on Windows XP?

Case Study: New Equipment for the Farmshed


While we hear a great deal about how rural Australia lags behind the cities in access to and adoption of the Internet, this hasn't stopped The Farmshed from wanting to be a one stop shop on the Internet for the agricultural sector.

More to the point, by providing decision support services, market intelligence, and a marketplace for agribusiness inputs, The Farmshed wants to use the Internet to introduce efficiencies into Australian agriculture.

These services include weekly updates, market alerts, and SMS alerts on futures prices and cash prices.

"Think of companies like Steggles or Ingham, which are growing at six percent, whereas the rest of the sector is growing at one percent," says Farmshed senior technical architect Glen Andrews. "We hope to get medium-sized agribusinesses to share that same growth by giving them the same support services and market intelligence the larger companies have."

Andrews supports the PCs of 30 administrative and technical staff, as well as the production staff from the Web site. Initially, these machines were all running Windows NT and starting to be upgraded to Windows 2000 Professional. Then Andrews received advance copies of Windows XP Professional from Microsoft and rolled it out to the admin and technical staff's PCs.

XP cuts out some system administration tasks and simplifies or improves others, says Andrews. The Remote Desktop feature was a key decision factor.

"We've got remote sales staff and staff at home who want to access office functionality and work from home. However, because our sales staff are running around the country in rural areas, we still wanted something that used relatively low bandwidth."

The integration of videoconferencing and remote assistance into Windows Messenger is assisting Andrews' technical support tasks as well.

"For a small business that's often not great help because you're usually in the same room. However, since I have remote staff, I can take control over their machine even if they're in Cloncurry," he says.

Alternative OSes
OS X 10.1
  • The Good: Improved performance; moveable Dock; support for digital cameras; excellent DVD and CD burning; new keyboard shortcuts; built-in Windows networking client.
  • The Bad: Few native applications; Dock is cluttered.
  • The Bottom Line: Thanks to version 10.1, OS X is now ready for the masses. If you already have OS X, upgrade now. OS 9 users should wait for Microsoft Office X to ship. The March Mac OS X release opened lots of possibilities for the Mac platform, but it simply wasn't quite there. Mac OS X 10.1, the long-awaited update, fills the cracks. This version speeds up application launching and fixes OS X's first awkward, unresponsive desktop, and even adds hot new tricks such as dazzling DVD and digital camera integration, compatibility with Windows networks, and new Finder tools. If OS X was a release for early adopters, version 10.1 is must-have upgrade for the same crowd. If you're still humming away with OS 9, however, wait to upgrade until key applications, such as Microsoft Office X, ship in November.
  • Red Hat Linux 7.1
  • The Good: Allows foolproof package upgrades via Red Hat Network system management; includes the 2.4 kernel; adds Apache and printer configuration tools.
  • The Bad: Sound configuration is text-based and can only be performed after installation.
  • The Bottom Line: With new configuration tools and an excellent Web-based system management service, Red Hat 7.1 deserves serious consideration as a Linux solution for your organisation.
  • Andrews finds the IntelliMirror feature a great time saver, allowing him to push out standard images to all the PCs.

    "You can create a scripted install file, and that becomes a no-interaction installation, just bung it in and it works. It saved us a hell of a lot of time, we did 20 machines in a night," he says.

    What's a Raw Socket?

    If Smart Tags caused the most XP media furore, the raging argument over something called full TCP/IP socket support, or raw sockets support, has created the most sheer confusion. Full socket support means that the entire functionality of TCP/IP, the communications protocol used on the Internet, is built into Windows so that individual programs don't need to include support themselves. Prior versions of Windows 95, 98, and Me did not have this built-in functionality, although it's been in NT and 2000 all along.

    Steve Gibson and other security advocates screamed that providing full TCP/IP socket support in Windows XP would provide would-be hackers an easy way to exploit PCs for illicit purposes. Full socket support makes it easier for miscreants to spoof or falsify a PC's IP address, letting Trojan horse programs escape detection when they launch denial of service attacks. Using spoofed IP addresses makes it difficult, if not impossible, for system administrators and ISPs to isolate and stop such attacks.

    Microsoft countered that full socket support is a non-issue and that it enhances XP's own Internet features and makes it easier for others to implement theirs.

    However, one issue lingers: most XP users will by default have top-level, or administrator, rights to modify their Windows system. Administrator-level users can install, add, modify, or delete apps and files; change other users' access to the systems; and use programs that take advantage of full socket support and address spoofing. That means anyone who breaks into your XP PC can run amok on your system and even use it to launch denial of service attacks.

    There are good reasons for including full socket support. For one, it already exists in Windows NT and 2000, as it does in Linux, SunOS, and other operating systems. Full support in the OS means that developers don't have to write code for those functions into each and every application they create (as they do for Windows 95 through Me), and that keeps apps smaller and more stable. Besides, hackers had an easy enough time writing Trojan horses into their malicious code and using them to launch distributed denial of service attacks against Gibson's Web site and othersââ,¬"all from Windows machines without full socket support. Gibson's call to action is to limit the number of users who have admin rights on all systems and to avoid working in admin mode as much as possible; instead, be deliberate about setting up non-administrator user accounts for yourself, your coworkers, and your family to use in order to minimise system corruption and maintain security.

    Advertisement

    Talkback 5 comments

      No Thanks, I will not be using ...Anonymous -- 24/10/01

      No Thanks, I will not be using Windows XP!

      No thanks for WinXP. Using Wi ...J.E. Henry -- 25/10/01

      No thanks for WinXP. Using Windows Upgrade Advisor to test the compatibilities for WinXP that came with Australian Personal Computers magazine and found my few programs won't work and harddrives won't work with WinXP will cost me heaps to fix the issues up before real upgrade to WinXP. I think it's too early to believe whether is stable.

      I have got one big problem wit ...linux kicks Micro$oft -- 28/10/01

      I have got one big problem with XP, its the product activation stuff, that sux. I now run a dual boot b/w Linux (RH 7.1) and the 'doze 98, which i only use for games.

      Why pay $300+ on a piece of software that rips its ideas from everyone else. Join the linux revolution!

      why buy winxp when you can dow ...bill gates -- 30/10/01

      why buy winxp when you can download it for free online?

      I will not be buying this upgr ...Anonymous -- 31/10/01

      I will not be buying this upgrade as I am using win2k on desk and laptop. Will definitely not pay for 2 upgrades. MS should have the same policy as with office and allow use on a desk nd laptop under the same licence.

    Add your opinion

    Latest Videos

    Sponsored content

    Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

    Blogs

    Tags

    Back to top

    Featured