Should Leopard still be in Apple's beta box?

Apple sold two million copies of its latest operating system, Leopard, within one week of its release on 26 October but, since then, numerous flaws have been discovered -- which raises the question: should Apple put Leopard back in a beta cage or is it ready for the wild?


Leopard in the news


1. Leopard stumbles over file transfers A flaw has been identified in the way Apple's operating system Leopard moves files between storage volumes which deletes the source file if the transfer is disrupted.

2. Parallels with Leopard: 'a few issues' Despite some problems, SWsoft, manufacturer of Parallels virtualisation software for Macs and PCs, say that the product is compatible with the new Leopard release of Mac OS X.

3. Apple's Leopard prompts blue screen of death Following its release on Friday, Mac OS X Leopard users have been encountering the dreaded "blue screen" error when trying to install the operating system.

4. Apple flags OS X Leopard security features In advance of Friday's general release of Apple Mac OS X Leopard, Apple has posted details of 11 new security features in the new operating system intended to make Leopard more secure than Tiger.

5. Holes discovered in Mac OS X Leopard security Although Apple is selling its new Mac OS X Leopard operating system on its improved security, researchers at Heise Security have already found fault with its firewall.

6. Mac trojan multiplies but won't kill your dog If users thought the Mac-targeted trojan discovered last week was a one-off, they'll need to think again -- security firm F-Secure has discovered 32 variants of it, but claims about its powers have been wildly overstated, according to experts.

7. Get ready for the summer of Apple Apple is preparing for one of the most pivotal summers in its history.

Video footage of Leopard

1. Four new features in LeopardFour new features in Leopard

2. Mac OS X v10.5 (Leopard) The grace of Leopard's interface enhancements makes productivity more pleasurable with a Mac, as more than 300 functional and fun features top off this update.

3. Buzz Report: Apple, you bore meThis week on Buzz, Molly snoozes through an Apple press conference and questions Microsoft's attitude towards a recent Windows Vista patch.

Talkback 10 comments

    Beta with what you listed Edwin Creely -- 09/11/07

    Get serious. The list of items you gave hardly makes it Beta and will all be fixed at 10.5.1. I have been using 10.5 ever since it has been released and have not encountered any issues. You are always going to encounter some problems on first release. They were there with Tiger. Now Vista! Let's not go there.

    Liam Tung Anonymous -- 09/11/07 (in reply to #320089452)

    Wow what a journo, you write a paragraph and put a bunch of hyperlinks to other stories and think that deserves a byline credit.. What a joke..

    And I really doubt you understand enough about software to say if something should be in beta or not!

    Anonymous Anonymous -- 12/11/07 (in reply to #320089459)

    see the little "squiggle with a dot" at the end of the headline (like this -->>?)

    seems like you don't understand the difference between a question and a statement.

    Seems like... Anonymous -- 12/11/07 (in reply to #320089594)

    ..you don’t understand that people think its a preposterous question, written by someone with no understanding of the software release life cycle

    seems like... Anonymous -- 12/11/07 (in reply to #320089598)

    you think its a preposterous question.

    Vacuous headline and article zax zan -- 11/11/07

    The simple answer is - NO.

    I suggest that you spin in the positive for Apple, they are the future -

    Apple? give me a break Anonymous -- 12/11/07 (in reply to #320089578)

    OS X is based on Linux. Linux is the future and apple is riding the bandwagon.

    Apple is a hardware company -- a bloody good one.

    Bzzzzzt. Wrong. Highly Nonymous -- 15/11/07 (in reply to #320089596)

    OSX is not based on Linux, it is based on NextStep. It has the Mach microkernel and is architected quite differently to Linux. Linux has an "old-school" fat kernel. Pros and Cons of the various approaches aside, theyre quite different fundamentally. Also OSX is Unix compliant, conforming to the SUSv3 and POSIX 1003.1 specifications. Linux is close, but not there.
    Here's a family tree: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Unix_history.en.svg

    Secondly, they're not a hardware company. Asus is a hardware company. In fact, Asus and a bunch of other manufacturers actually build apple hardware. Apple does software and hardware desgin. In fact, all their stuff comes branded with 'designed in California, USA'.

    Thirdly, what band-wagon? Jobsy founded Next after leaving Apple in 1985. Top Gun hadn't even been released yet, let alone the Linux kernel.

    hahahahhahahahah mad macs -- 12/11/07

    You Apple fan boys are hilarious. Why can't you take the glasses off and see APple software is not more reliable than Microsoft?

    Keep pretending, keep believing the hype and wathc as your computer gets filled up with malware

    microsoft is reliable Anonymous -- 12/11/07 (in reply to #320089600)

    reliably insecure

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured