The SCO Group's Australian and New Zealand boss, Kieran O'Shaughnessy, told ZDNet Australia late Friday afternoon he was preparing to fly to London to finalise next week the vendor's strategies for securing license agreements with large commercial users of Linux in Australia.
He said the point at which the license would be available to Australian and New Zealand users was "very, very close". Pressed for firm a date, he confirmed that it would be before the end of the first quarter this year.
A number of Australia's larger organisations, including telecommunications heavyweight Telstra, are deploying Linux throughout their operations, while Air New Zealand is another keen user.
O'Shaughnessy's trip coincides with the running next week in Adelaide of one of Australia's highest-profile Linux events, Linux.conf.au 2004, at which the SCO Group's long-running campaign is likely to be a hot topic.
The local managing director was unable to confirm which of the SCO Group's senior executive team would be at the meeting in London, but said they would be "big hitters".
O'Shaughnessy confirmed the terms and conditions outlined in the licenses would be very similar to those offered to U.S.-based companies, with the pricing adjusted only to accommodate variations in currency values.
SCO's U.S. headquarters announced in July last year its plan to allow companies using Linux avoid litigation over alleged breaches involving its Unix intellectual property by acquiring a license from the vendor.
The program tries to compel users to pay US$699 (AU$903) for a one-processor Linux server, with the amount rising relative to the power of the system, as well as US$199 (AU$257) per Linux desktop.
However, SCO in the U.S. toughened its stance towards the end of the year, warning it intended to sue large-scale Linux users for copyright infringement. The company plans to start filing lawsuits within the next few months, targeting large companies with significant Linux installations. The initial round of lawsuits were expected to be filed against 1,500 companies.
SCO also sent out in mid-December last year around 3,000 letters to companies, Universities and other organisations that licensed Unix, typically from AT&T, widening its attempts to secure revenue.
Asked whether he had any message for delegates to Linux.conf.au 2004, O'Shaughnessy said SCO was determined to protect its intellectual property and ensure that any misappropriation was dealt with.
"We're serious," he said.
He also confirmed he had not heard any further news from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission over a complaint from Linux activist group Open Source Victoria.
Stephen Shankland contributed to this report.
"We're serious", he says.
Baloney.
When a copyright owner finds that someone has illegally copied their IP, the correct procedure is to specify the infringing material and demand that it be removed. SCO has yet to specify a SINGLE LINE of infringing code. They have made vague allegations about certain files, but they have yet to specify exactly what lines of code are infringing and why.
Their only attempt at being specific was the fiasco at SCOForum, which blew up in their face. And now they have the gall to say, "We're serious."