SCO: Australian companies should dump Linux



Businesses currently using Linux must seriously consider turfing it out, according to Kieran O'Shaughnessy, regional general manager for SCO Australia and New Zealand.

On Wednesday, the company sent letters to 1,500 top international businesses warning that they may be held liable for breach of copyright for using Linux, which allegedly contains copied proprietary Unix source code.

"I think organisations need to reassess their position with regard to Linux," said O'Shaughnessy. "They need to make a call in consultation with their legal advisors as to how they perceive the risks and whether they think it is a practical and viable path to go down, given the question marks SCO is raising over the Linux product."

SCO currently owns the intellectual property rights over the source code for Unix, which was developed by AT&T. AT&T sold those rights to Novell, which sold them to Unix vendor SCO. SCO was taken over by Linux vendor Caldera, which subsequently changed its name back to SCO.

"Users of Linux are getting a benefit from Linux which they are in effect not entitled to because it takes advantage of SCO's property without any authorisation," claimed O'Shaughnessy.

While major Linux vendors such as Red Hat deny SCO's claims, it is end users who may be most at risk, according to Gartner analyst George Weiss. "Red Hat, like most other independent software vendors, uses indemnification clauses in the end-user license agreement to absolve itself from liability or damages based on the content of the software," said Weiss in a report.

O'Shaughnessy agreed, adding: "Because it is an open source project, at the end of the day nobody can really stand up and say 'we know everything that's gone into Linux and we'll indemnify you, Mr Customer, because it's our product and we control what goes into it'. There's so many contributors to Linux that the opportunity for copyrighted material to get into Linux is very real."

It was "a very real possibility" that CEOs or CIOs would order their IT departments to remove Linux from their systems, at least until the copyright issues were sorted out. "It's going to be very disruptive," O'Shaughnessy said.

In March, SCO initiated a lawsuit against IBM for using copyrighted Unix code to improve Linux. The company has not ruled out further legal action. "We have at this time announced no other legal action or intent on legal action," said O'Shaughnessy. "What has been said is that we will pursue and protect our intellectual property and pursue people we believe have violated our intellectual property."

The company has also withdrawn from sale its own Linux distribution, SCO Linux, part of the UnitedLinux family of Linux distributions that also includes SuSE, TurboLinux and Conectiva.

"We can't in good faith also be selling a product that we believe there are serious question marks over in terms of intellectual property or copyright infringement," explained O'Shaughnessy. "We've taken what we view as a major step, and an indication of how seriously we take this whole matter by withdrawing what is a strategic product from our portfolio."

However, he claimed that SCO has by no means given up on Linux.

"We announced a suspension, not a termination. We feel that for the good of Linux, these intellectual property and copyright question marks need to be resolved. Once these can be rectified and resolved once and for all, then there's every chance we would get back into Linux," O'Shaughnessy said. He was unable to provide an estimate of how long that might take, however. "I couldn't even begin to guess. Once you get into the legal world, anything's possible," he said.

Subscribe now to Australian Technology & Business magazine.

Advertisement

Talkback 14 comments

    I now have a strong idea that ...Anonymous -- 16/05/03

    I now have a strong idea that the long time friend of SCO, Microsoft is the master mind of this lawsuit. Microsoft as SCO both have seen loss in the server market to Linux, because Microsoft has wanted to crush Linux so to complete it's "world takeover", it talked SCO into being the fall guy for this "one chance" to kill Linux and the opensourc community that support it.

    The last thing anyone should do now is to "dump" Linux for Unix or Microsoft server software: This is just what they want !!!. Give up on LInux now, SCO if the outcome of this lawsuit is that their code in Linux ( if any and i don't think so ) holds no legal ground, and no action by the court(s) are taken, then Microsoft and SCO together will have the only game in the world for computers forever !!!. Linux will die, having no one to bring it back and no way to do so.

    No, Australian, US and all companies, nor vendors world wide should dump Linux in fear of this, i think, Microsoft master mind & SCO plot to run the world through the largest business in the world, computers and the software that run on them.

    LIux should have a chance, but will have none if all dump at once.

    At this point, all they have i ...Anonymous -- 16/05/03

    At this point, all they have is hot air and accusations. A lawsuit is only a claim, not proof in and of itsself. They've refused to come up with even the most vague evidence when prompted, and I can only assume that means they're relying on some strange strategy to get their claim through, rather than a straight proof of the facts.

    If all that they claim is true, I can't see any reason to refuse to reveal the "evidence." They state fears it'd be "swept under the rug" by the linux community - which is just BS, the "evidence" is all there at kernel.org and scattered around the 'net if they need it. They have a complete copy themselves - they should know, they sell it!

    Don't be scared into jumping until they can prove something. I suspect SCO is a dying company that's turning to litigation and scare tactics to try to drive its business as sales of its obsolete and inferior UNIX variant continue to fall. I'd say they can't make it on technical merit anymore, and they're desparate.

    Have a read of SCO's claim as found on http://www.sco.com/scosource/ if you want a good laugh - its quite sad. Really shows how desparate they are, especially the way they try to mix UNIX in general up with their variants, SCO OpenServer and SCO Unixware (collectively SCO UNIX) to make it sound like they're still relevent in the market.

    Naturally, this is all my opinion - but I promise you that I'm personally acting on it. We have linux servers here, and are in the middle of an LTSP-based thin client deployment. Hot air from SCO won't change that - and a successful lawsuit would probably only force us to upgrade to a new release without the contested code.

    The regional general manager f ...Glenn Murray -- 16/05/03

    The regional general manager for SCO Australia and New Zealand should not worry about his company getting back into Linux. The rumours are that SCO is on the skids anyway and this legalistic attempt to stave off the evil day does it no credit.
    Linux does not need SCO and will be around long after SCO, or whatever name it then goes by, is long gone.
    This last gasp attempt to shore up its failures is of benefit to the open scource community as it will deplete SCO's already sagging coffers.

    Conspiracy theorists take note ...Anonymous -- 16/05/03

    Conspiracy theorists take note!

    Given SCO is in custody of UNIX and a contributor to Linux, what surety do we have that it (or its agents) didn't seed Linux with the offending source for nefarious purposes?

    SCO claims of intellectual pro ...Anonymous -- 16/05/03

    SCO claims of intellectual property violations
    have been analyzed and found to be grossly
    deceptive. Moreover, it has the look and smell of
    a dying company that is clutching to straws.
    One of SCO's claims is that Linux kernel contains
    technology which would not have been achievable
    without using SCO code. This is laughable, as
    SCO's own UNIX-derived products do not contain
    such technology. Moreover, Caldera (the company
    that eventaully became SCO) actively helped in the
    development of the Linux kernel and released
    it under the GPL license, which specifically
    states that any rights to intellectual property
    are forfeited.

    A good analysis of SCO's claims (including
    historical context) is provided at the Open Source
    Initiative site, authored by Eric Raymond, a UNIX
    veteran/hacker who was active well before Linux
    ever existed. You can find the analysis at:

    http://www.opensource.org/sco-vs-ibm.html#id2791065

    SCO would need to take a much ...Anonymous -- 17/05/03

    SCO would need to take a much broader law suit against the industry in general to protect their intellectual property. The C programming language was designed to solve operating system coding problems encountered in the development of Unix. Over the years, much of our university courses on operating system design have incorporated the lessons of the original Unix designers. Messrs Kernighan and Ritchie of Kernighan, Ritchie and Thompson Unix fame wrote a book on "Programming in C" that is still the starting point for most C programmers. Even the Xinu operating system used for teaching operating system principles retains a very unique Unix coding style, although it was developed as Linux was, from scratch. It is for this reason that many people have said over the years that Unix is C. The coding practices of C form the implementation patterns for operating systems. It is little wonder that Linux smells a bit like Unix - the same programming language, the same guidelines for operating system design, the same textbooks and the same example algorithms as solution templates.

    Rather than being remembered for innovation and forward thinking, SCO will be remembered as a mean and petty corporation that bought a piece of IT history and begrudged the rest of the industry for its own failures.

    alternate OS FreeBSD If anyone ...Anonymous -- 17/05/03

    alternate OS FreeBSD
    If anyone reading this was seriously thinking of removing linux from their servers there may be a product worth looking at FreeBSD.
    FreeBSD is another Open Source unix based on BSD 4.3 FreeBSD is compatible with most Linux Programs now due to a set of compatibility libraries that can be optionally installed in the operating system. for further information take a look at http://www.FreeBSD.org/

    I want to stand by Linux, i ha ...Anonymous -- 17/05/03

    I want to stand by Linux, i have many computers now running Linux for personal and business. If i were to change to say FreeBSD, ( great OS ! ), would cost more then i want to spend on SCO 50 yardline tickets to see them play this game.

    Die and be done with it SCO, i will use Linux no matter how much time this lawsuit takes to show it is in fact a joke.

    I wish you linux evangelist bi ...Anonymous -- 20/05/03

    I wish you linux evangelist bigots would leave your rediculous conspiracy theories in the gutter where they belong. What does Microsoft have to do with any of this, apart from your irrational hatred of the company. You're talking about a f#*king operating system here!! Can't you get that through your thick heads! An OPERATING SYSTEM. It is a tool with which you apply a trade, not a God that you worship.

    Linux evangelist we are, bigot ...Anonymous -- 20/05/03

    Linux evangelist we are, bigots ?, no, conspiracy theories are what people think or know what is going on. What about Microsoft's irrational hatred of Linux, it all comes down to they don't want anyone else in the market for anything not just OSs. Microsoft having 90% of the market does not mean it cannot change. Linux having grown into the markets as a whole, have gain in those markets to come and in many cases replace Microsoft. Linux users want what you don't have with Microsoft, freedom from the total-control and cost... thats all.

    If SCO makes linux illegal, th ...Stephen Kuhn -- 04/06/03

    If SCO makes linux illegal, then I'll happily be a criminal. I will never live my life based on what COMPANIES dictate to THE PUBLIC. THAT is dictatorship.

    If SCO weren't hurting for cash to pay it's shareholders, would they have even bothered with this farce? And if they believe that everyone that sells is was doing it illegally, then why aren't they slapping their OWN wrist for selling it and developing it further?

    They're just as guilty of IP theft as anyone else in the software industry - and it's rife with it anyways.

    I find Jason Green's comments ...Anonymous -- 11/06/03

    I find Jason Green's comments quite offensive and unhelpfull in the debate at hand. Having said that the Attitude of a lot of Linux "crusaders" is enough to give linuxitis to any average user...So calm down people and take a deep breath...
    Fact1: Microsoft has got a virtual monopoly and does not look nicely at anyone who might pause a threat, however small...It has gone to some length to not play ball, as shown in various well publicised Court cases, including a conviction of Piracy in a French Court...
    Fact2: if it was not for Microsoft we might still be looking at boring and criptic text screens instead of enjoying a GUI (by this I do not mean MS invented GUI. Like it or not MS spearheaded the IT revolution, has become extremely rich off it, and like all Powerfull leaders, the line between what is fair and what is unfair can get blurry because THEY know what's good for you (and for them) and the echoes of dictatorial(goose)steps are never far away... when you no longer have a choice, you take what you are given, at whatever cost...(freedom of choice, Quality and reliability of Products, Overall running costs and "necessary" upgrades...)
    Fact3: Enter Linux which has the great potential attraction of running on an oil rag,of being independent, free (or at least a great deal cheaper), stable and ever changing due to a myriad of "helpers", quasi Philanthropists, in their quest for a better world away from a World domination of One All Mighty...
    Fact4: Enter SCO, sorry Caldera, or is it SCO, a company in search of its own soul..and some hard cash. They own some Unix stuff (funny Caldera never made a fuss about it before buying SCO..didn't they know??)and Bingo here is the Linux explosion and so many companies doing nicely out of it...a couple of lawyers later, you've got yourself a Law suit; Voila! "elementary, my dear (Dr)Watson.!!"
    Now forgive me, but I smell a rat...Who would benefit from Linux demise? no conspiracy theory here, simply business..
    By the way I am Ms user, having played around with Linux but still tearing my hair with its intricacy.. I've loaded and unloaded Linux 4 times in the last 3 weeks on my XP Pro laptop, still searching for the best way to dual boot.. it's exiting and annoying. Both have their place and their part to play.. please no more fight!! Lawyers are the winners and (end)users are the losers

    I think SCO should just admit ...Anonymous -- 19/06/03

    I think SCO should just admit that they are commercially doomed and that this whole thing is purely a desperate advertising stunt.

    To some extent its worked - I myself after 12 years in the industry had all but forgotten that little 3 letter acronym and their not-terribly-successful products from the 1980s.

    Linux is here to stay folks, its taking over the server market and in the next 2 to 3 years will do the same to the desktop applications market.

    Its code comes from every imaginable source, and it and the BSD OS's are pretty much on top of things as the worlds best OS for PC's, and are rapidly making up ground on other architectures as well.

    Get used to it.

    SCO appear to run Linux " ...Purple World -- 19/06/03

    SCO appear to run Linux

    "The site au.sco.com is running Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.7.1 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.3.2-RC on Linux"

    The above text is from the Netcraft utility, which anybody can use, at:

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?mode_u=off&mode_w=on&site=au.sco.com&submit=Examine

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured