Possible prior art for Microsoft smiley patent found

A technology used to include images in Usenet postings could cause a recently published Microsoft patent application to be rejected.

The patent application, which covers selecting pixels to create an emoticon image, assigning a character sequence to these pixels and reconstructing the emoticon after transmission, was filed by Microsoft in January 2004 and published by the US Patent Office last week.

However, X-faces, a technology that allows users to include images in Usenet news posts or in the headers of e-mails, appears to cover a similar technology. X-faces was developed around 15 years ago, with the first mailing list posting on the technology dated March 1991.

Patents are granted by the US Patent Office on condition that there is no prior art -- that no-one has evidence for a similar technology that is older than the patent. If X-faces does constitute prior art, it could invalidate the Microsoft patent.

Randolf Richardson from Canadian consultancy Inter-Corporate Computer and Network Services, said: "What Microsoft is patenting has already been in use for more than 15 years; just take a look at the unofficial X-faces NNTP [a USENET protocol] header that is used in newsgroups by users to include a small graphical image with their messages."

Another ZDNet reader said that X-faces "could count as similar". And Robert Billing, a software engineer at UK consultancy Tanglewood Algorithms, also said that Microsoft's patent could be invalid as it resembles X-faces.

A Microsoft spokesperson pointed out that comments on its patent applications can be submitted to the US patent office.

"We support the ability of anyone to submit prior art or input on a patent application with relevant authorities before a patent is issued. The public input mechanism is an important part of patent review process and it is available to anyone to use," said the spokesperson.

Information on how to submit information on potential prior art is available on the US Patent Office Web site.

ZDNet UK's Ingrid Marson reported from London. For more coverage from ZDNet UK, click here.

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    Hmmm, I have to agree I've see ...Anonymous -- 27/07/05

    Hmmm,
    I have to agree I've seen this technology well before 2000 so I'm afraid its a no brainer.

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured