Pirate Party storms Australia

The Pirate Party, which champions issues such as intellectual property rights, free speech and data privacy, is on its way to becoming an official party in Australia.

The party is gathering followers with the hope of achieving the 500 exclusive members needed to achieve official registered party status in the eyes of the Australian Electoral Commission. It is also holding elections next week on Wednesday night at 8pm to appoint a president, deputy president, general secretary, deputy general secretary, treasurer and deputy treasuer. Applications were to be sent in to applications@pirateparty.org.au.

The Pirate Party in Sweden, called Piratpartiet, secured one of 18 Swedish seats in the EU Parliament, according to the party's website. Over the weekend, its counterpart in Germany won 2 per cent of the vote in national elections. In the regional elections for the area of Schleswig-Holstein, the party also achieved 1.8 per cent of the votes.

According to ITNews, the party currently has 300 members here in Australia. When it receives its full number, the party said on its Australian site that it hoped to exert political pressure to help change intellectual property legislation. The party has limited the issues it wants to take a stand on to only intellectual property rights and related privacy issues.

The party said it doesn't endorse illegal copying of copyright material, but disagrees with the degree of control the intellectual property laws currently allow. It seeks a better balance between sharing information and recognition for authors, looking for reform.

"[The law] now acts to constrain, rather than foster innovation, and leads to the criminalisation of an entire generation who are sharing knowledge, culture and information freely and for no monetary gain, and a movement by proponents of copyright towards the erosion of civil liberties," the Australian site said.

Issues which were being discussed on the party's forums on its Australian site included the possible three-strike policy, which would shut down the internet connection of anyone who downloads pirated material after warnings; the proposed Australian internet filter; as well as proposed changes to Australian telecommunications legislation, which have the potential to affect the legality of communications interception.

Advertisement

Talkback 12 comments

    Pirate Bay logo Terry -- 29/09/09

    The front page of ZDNet shows The Pirate Bay logo in relation to The Pirate Party, a little bit of research shows even though they are on parallel lines as to what they do they are separate entities. Maybe it would be a good idea to put the right logo (the one for The Pirate Party) there instead perhaps?

    Have done Renai LeMay -- 29/09/09 (in reply to #320347796)

    Done! :)

    I was planning to do this anyway, the Pirate Bay logo was there as a stopgap measure as it was already in our system :)

    Photoshop editing takes time!

    Cheers,

    Renai LeMay
    News Editor
    ZDNet.com.au

    More Info Anonymous -- 29/09/09

    Anyone who wants more info on the Pirate Party Australia should visit http://www.pirateparty.org.au/

    Digital socialism? Anonymous -- 29/09/09

    This reeks of socialism. If you don't like commercial software, use open source and leave those of us who work in IT for a living alone.

    Re:Digital socialism? Yagan Kiely -- 29/09/09 (in reply to #320348457)

    Carl Lundström is considered to be leaning far right-wing and he is involved in TPB. IP Reform, Privacy and Free Speech are not mutually exlusive to right-wing, left-wing, socialism or capitalism.

    PPAU's approach to IP will not effect commercial software in any commercial way. Many software and OS companies neglect older out-dated software for better and well-maintained versions anyway.

    Re: Re: Digital socialism? Anonymous -- 29/09/09 (in reply to #320348501)

    I think not to put software developers off your cause, a clearly readable policy about what you are against would help argue your case.

    Why don't you also campaign against software patents? They are the single worst scourge that stifles innovation in software, much worse than any alleged effect that copyright may have.

    Re: Software Patents Yagan Kiely -- 29/09/09 (in reply to #320348747)

    We certainly are against software patents (and pharmaceutical patents) which is why we are striving for intellectual property reform, not just copyright reform (in addition to our policies regarding civil liberties).

    Re: Software Patents Anonymous -- 30/09/09 (in reply to #320348768)

    Thank you for your clarification, Yagan. I will keep your party in mind.

    Hmm Anonymous -- 30/09/09 (in reply to #320348768)

    That makes a lot of sense. Removing patents on medical research which provide the economic incentive to develop pharmaceuticals is a great idea - wish I had thought of it.

    FTA & PATENTS=DRUG CARTEL PROFITS Keith Styles -- 30/09/09 (in reply to #320349919)

    We need to look at the Indian model. Patents do serve a good purpose, for the company which spends the research dollars, BUT not the way we allow the Yanky drug cartel to dictate to us..via the FTA for 20 years and then let them extend it for ever with ME TO copies that vary the composition very little!!!.
    This type of nonsense happens when we let politicians pi*s in each others pockets.

    STORMS! Keith Styles -- 30/09/09

    I doubt the opening banner is factual, but at last we have a chance, if this party recruits enough members, to sort the absolute nonsense imposed by pinhead polititions. The likes of the FTA, AFACT's, repressive ISP filters, FOI (which isn't) right wing politicians who ALL push their own narrow agenda, has to be rigorously opposed.
    If we all sit back and do nothing, we'll certainly finish up with an Orwell's 1984 society, if we aren't already well on the way!

    Copyright reform. Simon Shaw -- 06/11/09

    I believe copyright reform is badly needed.

    What purpose does continuing copyright for decades after the death of the creator serve other than to line big corporations pockets with cash?

    This was done solely to allow Disney etc to continue raking the cash in years and years after the death of the creator.

    If they had their way copyright would never expire.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Welcome to National Censorship Day
    Conroy's blind adherence to his net filtering plan will abandon net neutrality ideals and push ISPs down a slippery slope of unprecedented responsibility for a callously politicised Australian internet.
  • Array That sinking Tcard feeling
    There's something terribly unsettling about realising that the NSW Government is considering hiring a company to build a new electronic ticketing system which has already put it through the legal wringer for the system's predecessor.
  • Array The challenge of government 2.0
    The Government 2.0 Taskforce released its draft report last week, and its recommendations for Open Government almost reads like a manifesto. Stilgherrian's guest on Patch Monday this week is the chair of the Taskforce, Nicholas Gruen.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured