ODF guerillas rally for document freedom

Twenty-two organisations across 60 countries are taking part in DocumentFreedomDay (DFD) to raise awareness about what happens when formats are no longer supported by proprietary software.

Inspired by the five-year-old SoftwareFreedomDay, the DFD initiative is being driven by supporters of the OpenDocumentFormat Alliance and other organisations such as the Free Software Foundation Europe, which is currently hosting the DFD's Web site.

Google Australia, which joined the ODF Alliance in 2006, hosted Sydney's DFD effort, where ACT Senator Kate Lundy discussed the issue of document formats for long-term archiving in institutions such as the National Archives of Australia.

Despite the high-profile controversy surrounding Microsoft's attempts gain ISO certification for its Office Open XML standard, Andrew McRae, a Google Australia senior software engineer and also President of the Australian chapter of the Internet Society, told ZDNet.com.au DFD is only intended to raise awareness for ODF.

"We're not trying to focus on any standard," McRae said. McRae, also a member of the Internet Engineering Task Force (ITEF), reckons the goal of open document standards is similar to open Web standards.

"From that perspective we felt that the value of open standards is that it allowed the Internet to really explode with innovation," he said. "In a similar way we felt that open standards for documents is important as well."

"We didn't want it to be about any particular standard or issue and we tried hard to avoid that."

McRae said there is nothing in principle wrong with two standards existing side by side. "In terms of having a second standard — similar to Internet protocol having a second protocol — as long as they work together and are fully supported, then in the Internet we find that does work... There are multiple [document] standards existing today so we need to ensure there is interoperability, a way of being able to move and share documents now and in the future and that software exists to interpret these standards."

But for now, as far as the organisers of DFD are concerned, the Open Document Format is the only truly open format that meets general office needs, while Microsoft's OOXML only comes close.

"But [OOXML] fails the test for an Open Standard in various ways, including an unclear legal status as well as inclusion of and reference to proprietary technologies. It has all signs of a vendor-specific format that only Microsoft will be able to implement completely," the group writes on its site.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Funny Anonymous -- 27/03/08

    Document Freedom! providing you do as you're told and use ODF...

    What's Even Funnier... Anonymous -- 28/03/08 (in reply to #320098738)

    ...is that ODF is FREE to include in any product. Is not patent encumbered and has no legal issues. Plus, it's backed by a large number of corporate backers like IBM and Sun Microsystems. I download full office suites that are free to use, free to download and are free to redistribute. And they are truly cross-platform applications. Not the Microsoft definition which is across different versions of Microsoft Windows (Win95,Win98,WinME,Win2K,WinXP,WinVista). So, if you do as YOU are told you will need to stay on the Microsoft upgrade gravy train and upgrade when you are told too.

    And remember: ODF is a format specification (ie instructions only) not an application.

    What can I say... Anonymous -- 28/03/08 (in reply to #320098749)

    I like to make my own decisions around the technology I use, office suite or file format.

    No disrespect, but I'm probably best placed to decide what is good for me than a stranger on the internet.

    This isn't "document freedom" it is "attack of the idelogical geeks". (being a geek is a good thing btw!)

    Choice... Anonymous -- 28/03/08 (in reply to #320098758)

    Choice is great, and we all have it.
    If you choose to use a proprietary format that means your documents are unreadable in 15 years, that's your decision. However at the moment many organisations (government included) DO NOT give you the choice, they foist that proprietary standard on you (and me).
    People can still choose to use DECnet, just don't expect them to be able to connect to anybody else.
    What DFD is all about is making people aware of the choice, and the *implications* of that choice - perhaps if you (and everybody) were well informed, then your choice would be different (i.e you may be better placed to understand what `good' means to you).

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured