The enterprise software company issued a statement on Tuesday dismissing a claim by SCO CEO Darl McBride that the acquisition contravenes an agreement signed in 1995. That's when SCO--a Lindon, Utah, company then called Caldera--acquired Unix System 5 from Novell.
"Mr. McBride's characterisation of the agreements between Novell and SCO is inaccurate," Novell said in the statement. "There is no noncompete provision in those contracts, and the pending acquisition of SuSE Linux does not violate any agreement between Novell and SCO."
The Provo, Utah-based software maker went on to say that it had not received "formal communication from SCO on this particular issue" and that it would respond if the Linux antagonist formally pursued the matter.
McBride's comments were made during a conference call on Monday in which he discussed SCO's continued retention of Boies Schiller & Flexner, a law firm whose partner David Boies represented the U.S. government in its antitrust case against Microsoft.
"We bought the Unix System 5 rights from Novell back in '95, and there was noncompete language that would prevent Novell from competing against our core offerings," McBride was quoted as saying in a transcript provided by SCO. "Linux is a knockoff of Unix. There can't be a more straightforward reading of the noncompete clause."
By "reading," SCO clarified on Wednesday, McBride meant "violation."
In the conference call, McBride hedged on whether SCO intended to sue Novell over the alleged contract infringement.
"When the Novell-SuSE deal is complete, we will take measures to enforce the noncompete agreement with Novell," McBride said, according to the transcript. "I don't know that it will turn into a lawsuit. That depends upon how they respond, and if they put a competitive product in the marketplace."
I wish I had been stupid enough to use SCO products then I could have had the great pleasure of dumping them.
I am heartily sick of their legalistic posturing.
It is a pity that the media can't stop giving them exposure.