Microsoft winds back Office ribbon

Microsoft has modified its new interface for Office 2007 after complaints from beta testers that the 'ribbon' system took up too much space on screen.

Office 2007 has ditched the traditional drop-down menu approach of most Windows applications in favour of the ribbon, which displays functions in new categories such as Home, Insert and Mailing in a strip across the top of the screen.

Microsoft says the new interface makes it easier for users to access the wide range of features in applications such as Word, Excel and Access.

However, in the next technical refresh of the Office 2007 beta, users can set the ribbon to automatically minimise whenever it is not being used, effectively making the ribbon headings look like traditional menus. (Windows has long offered a similar auto-hide option for the taskbar.)

Microsoft Australia technical specialist John Hodgson said the change came about after complaints from some customers. "One of the feedbacks we got is that it takes up too much room," he said during a presentation at Tech.Ed 06 in Sydney.

Despite the change, Microsoft remains committed to using the ribbon interface, although it isn't included in all Office components. Visio, for example, has no ribbon options at all, and Outlook does not use the ribbon in all contexts.

The changes to the Office interface are expected to meet some resistance from users familiar with older versions.

The product "will face some serious foot-dragging at both the individual and corporate levels," Forrester analyst Nate Root wrote in a 2005 paper analysing the new interface.

One other change in the next technical refresh, due for release to beta testers in the near future, actually consumes more screen space by offering large 'text tips' when users mouse over individual ribbon elements.

The current File menu, accessed from a Start-like button in the top left-hand corner, will also have its name changed to the Office menu, Hodgson said.

Hodgson also confirmed that Microsoft is working on tools to help enterprises automatically translate existing documents into new file formats being introduced in Office 2007.

"We've been asked by a lot of customers to provide tools to do mass migrations," he said. "There will be tools that will take a million documents and migrate those to the new formats."

One likely incentive for that migration will be reduced storage costs. Microsoft claims that file sizes for the new Office 2007 XML-based formats are up to 75 percent less than existing Office formats.

Talkback 17 comments

    Give the Ribbon a try Brian -- 25/08/06 (in reply to #120140857)

    I've been playing around with Office 2007 Beta 2 for a contract job. I'm not a Microsoft fan at all, but I like the Ribbon. It's a big departure from using menus, but I think people will find it easier to use. I can understand people wanting to reduce the Ribbon's size because it is big, but for those that have never used it, hold judgement until you actually work with it for a week or two.

    Where's the pic... Ian -- 25/08/06

    Why even bother with a story about a change to a UI if you don't have a picture to show what that change is. It's worth 1000 words.... The rest is just blah, blah, blah...

    Where's the pic... Ian -- 25/08/06

    Why even bother with a story about a change to a UI if you don't have a picture to show what that change is. It's worth 1000 words.... The rest is just blah, blah, blah...

    Other problems with Office 2007 Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    I'm glad they listened to user complaints - too bad this is the only "feature" MS cared about. Why not fix issues that are present in the 2003 as well as 2007 Office

    I would have liked -

    1 Outlook to open 2 outlook profiles at the same time.

    2 A search in outlook e-mail messages to include the dang TO field so I know who it was going to when I search my sent folder - I'm pretty I know who it is FROM - there isn't as much of need for that folder.

    3. Outlook to reliably shut down - tired of switching profiles only to find outlook is still running so it opens the same profile.

    4. Access to NATIVELY support JPGS - have to install Photo Editor from office XP for Office 2003 to work - same problem for Office 2007 - of course what kind of person uses photos in a database - perhaps someone with an inventory?

    5. Excel to have an easier way to get rid of photo links - go ahead and copy and paste results from pricewatch - now delete the rows - funny - buy now is still there - isn't it?

    Jim Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    I'm glad they listened to user complaints - too bad this is the only "feature" MS cared about. Not sure why they didn't fix GAPs in the current Office 2003 and beta of 2007 instead of just working on a "FEATURE" that doesn't add to productivity.

    I would have liked -

    1 Outlook to open 2 outlook profiles at the same time.

    2 A search in outlook e-mail messages to include the dang TO field so I know who it was going to when I search my sent folder - I'm pretty I know who it is FROM - there isn't as much of need for that folder.

    3. Outlook to reliably shut down - tired of switching profiles only to find outlook is still running so it opens the same profile.

    4. Access to NATIVELY support JPGS - have to install Photo Editor from office XP for Office 2003 to work - same problem for Office 2007 - of course what kind of person uses photos in a database - perhaps someone with an inventory?

    5. Excel to have an easier way to get rid of photo links - go ahead and copy and paste results from pricewatch - now delete the rows - funny - buy now is still there - isn't it?

    ribbon deliberately different Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    This ribbon thing is a deliberate attempt to stop office being interchangeable with OpenOffice, despite there being no user-oriented reason to make such a change. MS just wants users to notice and panic when their sys admins choose a more cost-efficient option than MS themselves will provide.

    Ribbon is deliberately different Anonymous -- 26/08/06 (in reply to #120140887)

    Exactly. But that information didn't appear in the press release for some reason.

    Ribbon is deliberately different Anonymous -- 26/08/06 (in reply to #120140887)

    Exactly. But that information didn't appear in the press release for some reason.

    I am constantly baffled by ZD Net Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    Why is it that ZDNet continually posts articles like this without an images? This story NEEDS a graphic of the interface changes in question. Blogs have covered the ribbon extensively with lots of full-resolution screen captures but ZD posts an article without even a link to a picture. Useless.

    to improve or not to improve Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    Personally, I like the ribbons and find it easier to locate the tools I want to use, after all the old style is not perfect and innovation is about trying new ideas to see if it works better this other way. After all, it is easy to go with something you know and like as well as to complain about something that is different. Try to get past the “I do not like different” so you can provide a good evaluation of it first.

    However, I would not buy Work 2007 just to get the new interface, but it does get my attention to want to look at the product where as I would not have otherwise. I think Word could take a page out of the Grammar checker in WordPerfect as well as other improvement in the program.

    Users need a choice of interface Christian Davies -- 26/08/06

    Users need a choice of interface

    The ribbon sucks Anonymous -- 26/08/06

    Why break from the UI the rest of the OS and - more importantly - EVERY other application use?
    This is a terrible idea, and I don't see how developers will be able to provide a consistent UI across apps if M$ can't even do it with all of their Office 2007 apps.

    The Ribbon sucks Anonymous -- 02/12/06

    Unfortunately the ribbon is a very bad idea. It is not ergonomic, it provides a very bad productivity penalty for companies that upgrade users to the new Office, and with 20,000 users, and an Enterprise Agreement, my guess managers will ban Office2007 until Microsoft come to their senses and offer a "classic menu" alternative, or the EA terminates and they to OpenOffice, which gets better by the day. Also the multiplicity of new file-formats is another step in the wrong direction. Like IBM in the 1980's, Microsoft in the 2000's is losing it. Also Outlook 2007 is buggy and slow. Perhaps the only application that appears to offer anything is Excel. The rest sucks, and in fact more than sucks. Don't ask me to start on the Desktop Search capability....Google rules!

    Counter-productive and not ergonomic Anonymous -- 16/02/09 (in reply to #320071927)

    My employer recently installed Office 2008 on my machine for compatibility with many of our clients. There I was staring at the ribbon thing, not being able to find anything. The worst thing about the ribbon is that it is not ergonomic at all. Why? The distance between the top and the bottom items of a traditional menu is about 10cm, so in order for my eyes to scan the whole list they only need to move through a small angle, but with the ribbon, the distance between the first list item and the last is the whole screen across, so now my eyes are swaying left and right to locate things in the friggin' ribbon. Worst of all, traditional menus usually fitted even in small screens, but the ribbon looks different on a wide-screen display and a small laptop. Also, if I am looking for a menu entry called "Table properties", I look for a letter "T". In traditional menus the next initial is directly below the previous one, so it is easy to locate the initials, and therefore what you are looking for. In the friggin' ribbon even locating initials is hard becuase different commands are expressed using words of different lenghts. In addition different buttons in the ribbon are of different sizes. Mental. Finally, why don't they just put a damn search facility like the spotlight in MacOS that allows users to locate the commands even if they don't know where they are in the menus? Good job microsoft, your software developers must have an IQ of 150+, but a CSQ (common-sense quotient) less than their shoe size... absolutely pathetic.

    Excel 2007 Anonymous -- 13/01/08

    Processing larger worksheets takes up to 50 (fifty) times longer than Excel 2003.
    I use some 10 of these sheets in which I invested much development time.
    They seem to have become useless in the 2007 version. Conversion to one of the new format hardly makes any difference. Sheets with a lot of data cannot be handled. Clicking them gives you time to let out your dog and coming back you still have to wait.

    Ribbon messes up keyboard shortcut seriously Anonymous -- 04/03/08

    Fan of keyboard shortcuts like me? Well, you're in for a lot of trouble if you use the new Office package. Everything is not where its supposed to be. Almost none of the shortcut sequences work. What some people have spent hours learning, has been ditched without the possibility of restoring settings, since there are no option to switch to classic menus. I'm deeply appalled.

    Hoping for a service pack to fix this mess Anonymous -- 02/12/08

    The ribbon just rapidly inhales. It is more difficult to use, adds more levels than the old menus, contains unintelligible icons, and it constantly switches back to what MS deems to be the proper default selection. It is just utterly annoying.
    I can only hope that MS adds the option to switch back to the quick and easy menus in a service pack, but I don't have high hopes. MS for one doesn't give a damn about what the majority of customers wants and since the same majority of customers is blind they will continue buying MS's crap.
    I can't decide, which product is the worst Microsoft ever put out: Vista, MSO2k7, or Microsoft Bob?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured