Microsoft walks away from $50bn Yahoo offer

Microsoft officially withdrew its offer to acquire Yahoo on Saturday — but only after it threw an additional US$5 billion on the table.

In a letter to Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang, Microsoft chief Steve Ballmer confirmed that Microsoft was willing to offer US$33 a share, but that Yahoo was holding out for at least US$37 a share, or US$5 billion more than Microsoft was prepared to spend. In the letter, Ballmer also says he is ruling out a direct offer to shareholders.

"This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer," Ballmer said. "Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft."

Ballmer specifically pointed to Yahoo's plan to outsource its paid search to Google. "We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a 'hostile' bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo today," Ballmer said.

Such a move, Ballmer wrote, would undermine Yahoo's strategy and long-term viability, hurt its ability to retain engineers, and pose regulatory and legal problems.

Ballmer said in a statement that Microsoft would pursue its own strategy.

"After careful consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo do not make sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders, employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal," he said. "We have a talented team in place and a compelling plan to grow our business through innovative new services and strategic transactions with other business partners. While Yahoo would have accelerated our strategy, I am confident that we can continue to move forward toward our goals."

In the letter to Yang, Ballmer again made the case that Microsoft's offer was the best option for Yahoo shareholders.

"I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares," Ballmer said. "By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table. But clearly a deal is not to be."

Talkback 3 comments

    haha Anonymous -- 05/05/08

    Sucked in Ballmer

    They should just do a share raid Lord Watchdog -- 05/05/08

    It is a shame. It would have been a superb opportunity for Google to be knocked for six. Google are way too big for their boots.

    Dont downplay google Jerry Yang wannabe -- 08/05/08 (in reply to #320101028)

    Google are only so big because they are good at what they do. Best search engine

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Brad Howarth The key Topik is always money
    One of the big problems of the internet is that is practically impossible to keep up-to-date on preferred topics. You can limit your sources, but this can mean missing a lot of valuable data.
  • Array Do we need the legislative blackmail?
    Virtually everyone in the telecommunications industry has their say in the Senate Standing Committee's public hearing into the pending legislation to split up Telstra, in this week's Twisted Wire podcast.
  • Array Give Tax a break for a Change
    Considering the circumstances the Australian Taxation Office's (ATO) Change Program has been operating in over the last few years, it really hasn't been going too badly.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured