Microsoft's 'openness' may hobble OpenDocument

Microsoft's move to make its Open XML document format an international standard could hobble the uptake of OpenDocument, the OASIS-approved document format that is supported by Sun Microsystems.

Earlier this month, Microsoft said it would be submitting its Open XML document format, which will be the default file format in the next version of its Office suite, to standards body Ecma. The company hopes this will eventually mean Open XML will be approved by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and approved as a global standard.

The move comes after the US State of Massachusetts in September said it would adopt OpenDocument as its default document standard because it wanted to move away from proprietary document formats.

In a research note published on Thursday, Gartner analysts Rita Knox and Michael Silver, said that by pushing Open XML as an open standard, Microsoft may have effectively hobbled the widespread take-up of OpenDocument.

"The OASIS OpenDocument Technical Committee... has increasingly been seen as a serious competitor to the Microsoft specification. Microsoft's moves will likely stall that trend," the research note said.

Knox and Silver point out that the State of Massachusetts is now reconsidering its decision to adopt OpenDocument and ditch Microsoft's proprietary Office format, is an indication of the new trend.

"The Massachusetts state government, for example, had previously made a highly publicised decision to adopt OpenDocument and drop the Microsoft Office formats, but may now be considering a broader range of options in its approach to this issue," the analysts said.

The governor's office of Massachusetts earlier this week issued a statement saying that it was "optimistic" that Microsoft's Office Open XML document formats will meet the standard for an "open format".

"The Commonwealth is very pleased with Microsoft's progress in creating an open document format. If Microsoft follows through as planned, we are optimistic that Office Open XML will meet our new standards for acceptable open formats," the statement said.

However, Gartner recommends that enterprises looking for an open XML-based document format should adopt the OpenDocument format if they can exploit XML immediately because the Ecma specification is unlikely to appear for at least another year.

CNET News.com's Martin LaMonica contributed to this story.

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    single source of control Anonymous -- 02/12/05 (in reply to #120124132)

    From what I have read, the US State of Massachusetts was also looking at who has control of the specs. Just getting the Office Open XML standardized doesn't mean that mean that Microsoft will open up and share control of the specification in the future. Does it?

    I followed the standardization of the OpenDocument format periodically. I read over the meeting notes from the technical committee from time to time. There was no need for me to follow the process closely; but the fact is that I, or anyone else, could have. Anyone with a relevant thought or idea at least stands a chance of having their voice heard. The power of peer-review is very far reaching. I somehow doubt that Microsoft will be that open with their format.

    As I'm sure you all known, the OpenDocument stanardization process included all of big companies; basicly, all the relevant players were involved, except Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted to support an "open" format, then why didn't they join the technical committee from the beginning? And if the OpenDocument format was "technically inferior", then they could have contributed their own specs and started from there.

    Mozilla Vs Internet Explorer Anonymous -- 02/12/05

    Even if this was accepted whats the chances that Microsoft will follow the ISO standards it itself created?

    Lets compare Mozilla Firefox browser to I.E. as just one example;
    Mozilla = Follows Standards...
    I.E. = Does its own little thing...

    Now if you where a company that had to have something reliable, would you chose something that complies with standards or something that does not?

    Microsoft Anonymous -- 03/12/05

    After Microsoft-extended "Java", and Microsoft-extended "Kerberos", I think that it's obvious what they're gonna do:

    (1) They carefully limit their non-sue promise *only to patents*, while Sun's terms cover all necessary IP to implement the standard. If you think these are equivalent, THINK AGAIN until you get it right. They'probably gonna embrace and extend their own standard, "hiding" important elements in undefined BLOBS. I think that documentation for these BLOBS will be defined as a "trade secret", thus unavailable except under Microsoft's chosen terms.

    (2) Their website refers to a separate 'letter' which promises that future versions will be offered under the same terms... while Sun explicitly includes 'any subsequent version thereof ("OpenDocument Implementation") in which development Sun participates'. This took less than a dozen words for Sun to include, and MS was free to copy Sun's example. If you think that Microsoft's lawyers exclusion of subsequent versions from the convenant is an accident, THINK AGAIN until you understand what they're doing. Microsoft lawyers are not dumb, there's a reason for this.

    (3) "Except as provided below.... You are not licensed to sublicense or transfer your rights." If you think that this "royalty-free license" allows you to create and distribute software which reads/writes MS-XML files, I think that you're WRONG. Read the terms: You can only "make" and "use" such software (not distribute, or sell, or offer to sell, without signing additional license agreements with the Beast of Redmond).

    They still claim that their Kerberos is "Open", and that's a standard which THEY didn't invent. If you think that this convicted criminal enterprise is going to fully document their file formats for use by "open" software competitors (such as OpeOffice.org and Koffice), you need to take some time out. GET A CLUE.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured