Microsoft offers charity-friendly licence

Microsoft has created a special software licence for Windows 98 and Windows 2000 that allows charities and schools to use second-hand PCs without breaking the company's end-user licence rules.

As pressure increases on businesses to recycle or refurbish their old PCs, a greater number of used systems are finding their way into the hands of charitable organisations and schools. The catch is that, because the computers were sold with corporate licences, it is effectively illegal for the charities to make use of the computers without falling afoul of Microsoft's licence agreement.

To address this issue, the company has launched the Microsoft Authorized Refurbishers program, which allows selected companies to install updated versions of either Windows 98 or Windows 2000 to used computers for a "nominal charge" to cover "materials and program operations."

Elena Bonfiglioli, Microsoft's corporate social responsibility and community affairs director, said in a statement that the program will extend the life of PCs and help increase access to technology. She said the refurbishers program will "maximise IT access in schools and community centers to support more education for all and minimise the environmental impact of redundant hardware."

Three years ago, Microsoft gave in to pressure after at first demanding that an Australian children's charity buy new licences for donated computers. Eventually, the software giant offered to give the charity 150 packs of Windows 95 and 10 refurbished computers as a "gesture of goodwill."

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    As microsoft have already rece ...Anonymous -- 12/04/04

    As microsoft have already received an inflated payment for the installed system, another rip-off for the charitable institutions/ schools is entirely un-justifiable...

    Sorry Mocrosoft, "...the ...Anonymous -- 13/04/04

    Sorry Mocrosoft, "...the company has launched the Microsoft Authorized Refurbishers program, which allows selected companies to install updated versions of either Windows 98 or Windows 2000 to used computers for a "nominal charge" to cover "materials and program operations."

    This still sounds like Microsoft and there "Approved Partners" are making money out of the donation of 2nd hand PCs to Charitities.

    Microsoft needs to get the point that it has already been paid for the Software Licence and stop "Double Dipping".

    I'd like to know what exactly ...Anonymous -- 13/04/04

    I'd like to know what exactly 'nominal' equates to. If it's a 20 dollar distribution CD that allows unlimited copies, that would be 'nominal'

    Re double-dipping - I've got a feeling most second-hand computers would have their HD's stripped or erased - IOW, no OS, no applications. Interesting point is whether the license goes with the computer or stays with the original company.

    Even in the corporate world we ...Anonymous -- 14/04/04

    Even in the corporate world we've discovered that we can't keep existing OS licences when we upgrade our equipment. Our deals require each new PC to buy a new copy of the same OS that was purchased for the original PC it replaces! I'm now on my third PC and have (effectively) bought Win2k three times, once for each PC. Despite this, if we give away the PC it's OS licence doesn't go with it, it just vapourises.

    However, as a parent of school children that attend a small school, this could be a great benefit to them given that at the moment the only option is the outrageous fee for XP Pro and the H/W required to run it. I too hope that it's only a $20 (or thereabouts) fee or that they let us extend our existing legal copies of Win98 to the PCs that are donated to the school.

    Or you could dump the MS stuff ...Anonymous -- 14/04/04

    Or you could dump the MS stuff altogether and just install Linux. Much easier.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured