Microsoft 'must support OpenDocument'

Industry analysts and open source advocates believe that Microsoft will have no choice but to offer support for OpenDocument when more organisations start following the state of Massachusetts' lead.

Earlier this week, a Microsoft executive said that it was not supporting the open file format due to the absence of interest from customers. At the same time, the company said it was adding support the PDF to Office 12 after receiving "over 120,000 requests a month" from customers.

OpenDocument, which was approved by the standards body OASIS in May, has already been embraced by the commonwealth of Massachusetts and is being considered by governments in other countries and US states, according to IBM.

An OASIS spokeswoman said on Wednesday the public sector is making "great strides" in terms of user demand for OpenDocument.

Microsoft will be forced to offer support for OpenDocument if more organisations decide to use the file format, according to James Governor, an analyst at RedMonk.

"ODF [OpenDocument] is quite new, and it will take a while for demand to build. But I don't believe it will need 120,000 requests a month to change Microsoft's mind; just a few more high profile departures like Massachusetts," said Governor. "If Microsoft starts to lose customers because of a lack of ODF support they will offer a plug-in before you know it."

One of Microsoft Office's competitors, the open source productivity application OpenOffice.org, has already added support for the standard in its upcoming 2.0 release. John McCreesh, a marketing contact for OpenOffice.org, said that Microsoft's claim that there is no interest in OpenDocument is "curious".

"Possibly Microsoft is happy to lose the business of US States one after another, starting with Massachusetts, as they shut out Microsoft for failing to adopt the OpenDocument standard. Sounds like interest from customers to me," said McCreesh.

He claimed that Microsoft delaying support for OpenDocument is likely to drive people to migrate to OpenOffice.org.

Mark Taylor, the executive director of the Open Source Consortium, agreed that Microsoft's refusal to support OpenDocument is unlikely to be good for business, but was sceptical that Microsoft had received as many as 120,000 monthly requests for PDF.

"One has to question whether 120,000 people a month would contact Microsoft about anything," said Taylor. "Microsoft will either have to adopt open standards, or continue its slow slide into irrelevance."

ZDNet UK's Ingrid Marson reported from London. For more coverage from ZDNet UK, click here.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

  1. Open Document a double edged sword for MS Ian Lynch -- 08/10/05

    Poor old MS. If it adopts ODF it loses its monopoly on document files. If it doesn't adopt ODF it risks losing not only a few US States but the whole of the European Union.

    It almost makes one feel sorry for them.

    1. Finally some freedom of choice Neil Hucker -- 19/10/05

      It's about time that the majority of users are able to final make some choices about the word processor or other Office software they use. Don't get me wrong, MS Office is a fine piece of software, but it's dominance has forced people into the purchase and upgrade cycle of a product that they may not really want.

      For example where I work, the boss's software of choice is the Wordperfect suite. The problem is that we need to have an up to date copy of MS Office on hand, to be able to send attachments to clients and government departments (MS Office's filter for the PerfectOffice suite are few and don't work very well), and then to read attachments (WP's MS filter can't quite get the alignment and spacing right) from these groups.

      I've recently been using Open Office and it's a great bit of software (except for the lack of decent help files). The only thing is, it doesn't come with the bells and whistles of MS Office, which most people never use anyway. So why should we pay a premium for compatability of something we don't use? The ODF should make at least word processing more affordable for the average person who doesn't require extravagent features. MS Office will still be there for those that do, or are reluctant to change from their old suite (like my Boss with WP) because they know where everything is.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured