Microsoft limits Vista transfers

Windows Vista may have new features for mobile computers, but the operating system itself is becoming considerably less portable.

Under changes to Microsoft's licensing terms, buyers of retail copies of Vista will only be able to transfer their software to a new machine once. If they want to move their software a second time, they will have to buy a new copy of the operating system. In the past, those who bought a retail copy of Windows needed to uninstall it from any machine before moving it to another machine, but there was no limit to how many times this could be done.

"It was something that had been abused from a piracy perspective before," said Shanen Boettcher, a general manager in Microsoft's Windows Vista unit. "We're just being clear it's one move from machine to machine that you are licensed for."

The software company will use its antipiracy programs, including its recently announced Software Protection Platform, to enforce the new changes, Boettcher said.

Separate rules apply for the versions of Windows installed on new PCs, which is how most people get their copy of the software, Boettcher said. In most cases, copies of Windows purchased on a new PC cannot legally be transferred.

The licence changes also apply to virtualisation, in which a computer runs multiple operating systems, or multiple copies of the same operating system, at the same time. Customers can only transfer the copy of Windows once, including a transfer from one physical machine to a virtual machine, or from a virtual machine on one PC to a virtual machine on another PC.

"Virtualisation is a new technology," Boettcher said. "We are going to learn more about the use cases as we move forward."

People who have specific questions can call customer support, he said.

Microsoft is also making some other changes as far as virtualisation goes. Although any Windows version can serve as the primary, or host, operating system, only the Business and Ultimate versions of Vista can run as guest operating systems in virtualisation. In Windows XP, each virtual instance of the OS required a separate licence, but there were no restrictions on which versions could act as guests.

Large businesses that obtain Windows Vista Enterprise edition through a volume-licensing contract can run up to four instances of Vista on the same machine with a single licence. Developers in Microsoft's MSDN program can also use more copies of the operating system for testing purposes, Boettcher said.

The change is significant for technology enthusiasts, as well as for Mac users running software, such as Parallels Workstation, that allows Windows to run at the same time as the Mac OS.

The rule change would not have an impact on Apple Computer's Boot Camp software, which installs Windows in a separate partition and allows users to run the Mac OS and Windows, but not at the same time.

Also as part of the changes, Microsoft extended the warranty for Windows. Buyers of retail copies of Vista will get a one-year warranty, which is typical of most Microsoft software, as opposed to the 90-day warranty that comes with XP.

Boettcher said that Microsoft has heard some concerns regarding virtual machine issues, but doesn't think the licence changes represent a threat to Vista sales. "It hasn't come up as any kind of a blocker for adoption," he said.

Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

    It affects Boot Camp users too Fred Oz -- 17/10/06

    If I buy a full retail version of Windows, I should be able to move it from machine to machine without any limitation. Restricting it to one move is stupid and utterly unfair.

    It is quite likely that someone running Boot Camp will change their Mac more than once and not want to have to buy a new version of Windows just becaue they did.

    less and less attractive Anonymous -- 17/10/06

    I really like RC1 but I was trashed by WGA -- it suddenly changed saying it wasn't validated when it was and no matter what I did I could not validate it again.
    I know it is prerelease s/w but WGA is a nasty piece of work. A real pity that avarice looks like it is going to spoil what should be a great piece of software. I really feel very sorry for some great software engineers at Microsoft having their work trashed by the gnomes in marketing.

    License terms not significantly different, compared to what it was for XP Steve S -- 17/10/06

    Have a look at this article...

    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4548

    Mad Anonymous -- 18/10/06

    If Microsoft was an individual he/she would be locked up in some institution.
    Who are they kidding. The more idiotic paranoid fueled restrictions placed on Vista will encourage someone to crack each one of them and most probably result in increasing the number of illegal copies installed.
    Maybe someone in Redmond should read up on the ill fated alcohol prohabition of the 1920's and ust how well restrictions failed miserably in stamping out crime.

    Enforced Craig -- 18/10/06

    Perhaps so, but they'll be enforced in software. That could be a big problem for some users - small developers for whom an MSDN subscription is impractical or impossible; smaller businesses (not using "enterprise" licensing) trying to manage their Windows clients using sysprep disk images or other automated re-install methods; etc.

    upgrading Anonymous -- 18/10/06

    How many changes can you make to your computer's hardware before Vista will see it as a 'new' computer?
    If you change your motherbord for instance, is that it? No more install for you!

    It's called 'call Microsoft' Craigos -- 19/10/06 (in reply to #320070483)

    Microsoft would consider your motherboard replacement to be an upgrade or a fix - therefore wouldn't be seen as a new computer. If you were to completely upgrade all RAM, processor, motherboard - then I think it's fair on Microsofts part to claim you have a new machine.

    Although I am not happy with the current licensing restrictions they plan on imposing, atleast we don't have to buy a new Apple computer everytime we need to upgrade a component :P It's not like they can exactly transfer their licenses to a new PC.

    Upgrades want to be a bit more cheaper for the OS :@

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Can not-so-smart meters help the NBN?
    It was interesting to witness Conroy's recent enthusiasm to spruik the NBN's role in supporting the Smart Grid, Smart City initiative. What a pity that Conroy hadn't yet seen the damning report from the Victorian auditor-general about that state's smart-meter roll-out.
  • Array Can the Telco Reform Act be win-win?
    In the second of our two programs looking at the Senate Inquiry into the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Bill, we hear from shareholders, bureaucrats and industry groups.
  • Array Has New Zealand's smiling assassin delivered?
    One year into its tenure, how has the new New Zealand Government performed on issues of technology and telecommunications?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured